Thank you.The OP is from Issue No.24 (1997) of The Audio Critic written by its editor and publisher Peter Aczel. The article is titled "The Good Guys in the White Hats and Bad Guys in the Black Hats: a Guide for the Perplexed." PDF attached.
Safe to say Aczel was an objectivist audio writer. He had his followers.
Satire? hardly. If you ever met Peter he meant everything he wrote. Nowadays with social media and such he'd be sued for defamation and slander. Most of the people in his '97 roast are now deceased, including Peter. Back in the day, it seemed like every dealer, reviewer and distributor had a Peter Aczel story.Thank you.
Was the article intended as satire? Or was the author serious?
So Peter Aczel was just an audiophile Boomer ass#%le?Satire? hardly. If you ever met Peter he meant everything he wrote. Nowadays with social media and such he'd be sued for defamation and slander. Most of the people in his '97 roast are now deceased, including Peter. Back in the day, it seemed like every dealer, reviewer and distributor had a Peter Aczel story.
The OP is from Issue No.24 (1997) of The Audio Critic written by its editor and publisher Peter Aczel. The article is titled "The Good Guys in the White Hats and Bad Guys in the Black Hats: a Guide for the Perplexed." PDF attached.
Safe to say Aczel was an objectivist audio writer. He had his followers.
Funny enough, Aczel was a subjectivist for many years. But like a reformed cigarette smoker, he saw the light and became a diehard objectivist along with his chief writer David Ranada. Kind of after the Fourier speaker review debacle.The OP is from Issue No.24 (1997) of The Audio Critic written by its editor and publisher Peter Aczel. The article is titled "The Good Guys in the White Hats and Bad Guys in the Black Hats: a Guide for the Perplexed." PDF attached.
Safe to say Aczel was an objectivist audio writer. He had his followers.
Well I guess I get a kick out of going back and reading about and knowing audio history. There are a lot of characters in this industry.1997? Ancient history kind of moot isn't it. Who cares one look at it, even back then and I would have dismissed it out of hand as someone's ranting.
Rob![]()
He would have let David Ranada do the dirty work.It would have been interesting to read Peter Aczel's rant after the MQA debacle in which many reviewers got egg on their face by embracing MQA.
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |