did not know of SET amps was totally unfamiliar with the terminology.
Some people just have a good natural instinct at what things to avoid in life
did not know of SET amps was totally unfamiliar with the terminology.
The 375 is the pro version of the 2440. It had a titanium diaphragm, not beryllium. Beryllium diaphragms can be purchased from Radian, but that would actually make the 375 worse, not better, because the beryllium membrane is not optimized for 500Hz. The K2 and K3 have significant increases. In that case, it's better to go with the aluminum diaphragm from JBL if the titanium one is no longer available. However, the 375 is a very good driver. Extremely underestimatedI have heard a very good 4 way JBL dual FLH in f Germany, based on 4550, and Leif uses JBL woofers under his TAD.
JBL drivers are usually the lowest priced of the 3 (Altec mid and TAD highest, if you get JBL 375 with beryllium it gets same price as some Altecs). JBL tweeters are very popular.
Yet, outside Leif who used a 300b 7 watt on his 2220a Alnico woofers, never saw anyone use those low watts. I never heard the 9500.
The trick is to use a more flexible surround, like Kapton.the beryllium membrane is not optimized for 500Hz.
Yes am aware and the 2440 (pro) comes at a much lower price than the 375 (consumer) And people do add the Be from Truextent, as do they do for Radian Titanium drivers. I would recheck your titanium/alum thingsThe 375 is the pro version of the 2440. It had a titanium diaphragm, not beryllium. Beryllium diaphragms can be purchased from Radian, but that would actually make the 375 worse, not better, because the beryllium membrane is not optimized for 500Hz. The K2 and K3 have significant increases. In that case, it's better to go with the aluminum diaphragm from JBL if the titanium one is no longer available. However, the 375 is a very good driver. Extremely underestimated
Yes, of course, you can modify the "suspension" and use softer materials, but that creates other problems again. The JBL developers weren't amateurs, after all.The trick is to use a more flexible surround, like Kapton.
I'd be curious what those problems are. Do you think they will ever introduce a field coil version?Yes, of course, you can modify the "suspension" and use softer materials, but that creates other problems again. The JBL developers weren't amateurs, after all.
Attached a professional modified 375. PWT measurement.Yes am aware and the 2440 comes at a much lower price than the 375. And people do add the Be from Truextent, as do they do for Radian Titanium drivers.
My bad. Thank you for clarifying. A "senior" moment. Best.I am still struggling to understand what PeterA's "insight" actually is... I thought you could shed some light.
I was not referring to you!
If the rebuild is done perfectly, and that's definitely no easy task, then it's possible. But as I said, for that, you need to center it to within a tenth of a millimeter, the newly installed material must be precisely matched to the weight of the diaphragm in many tests, and the adhesive bonding must be absolutely perfect. If all that is correct, it will work. However, the frequency response of the 375 will still change. It will be usable at slightly lower frequencies, but it won't perform as well at the top end. I don't see the point in doing that.I'd be curious what those problems are. Do you think they will ever introduce a field coil version?
No, and last but not least, I don't like field coil drivers.I'd be curious what those problems are. Do you think they will ever introduce a field coil version?
No, and last but not least, I don't like field coil drivers.![]()
Attached a professional modified 375. PWT measurement.
Ked have you heard any of the Hornsolution speakers ? I have always like the way their designs look.I am not disputing measurements. People add Be to the 375 (and to Radian), and sell it at a premium
The 375 is the pro version of the 2440. It had a titanium diaphragm, not beryllium. Beryllium diaphragms can be purchased from Radian, but that would actually make the 375 worse, not better, because the beryllium membrane is not optimized for 500Hz. The K2 and K3 have significant increases. In that case, it's better to go with the aluminum diaphragm from JBL if the titanium one is no longer available. However, the 375 is a very good driver. Extremely underestimated
This apparently has been done in a 500Hz horn application with bandwidth past 15KHz. But I'm not talking about the 375. I know the drivers of my horns are JBL but I don't know which model.If the rebuild is done perfectly, and that's definitely no easy task, then it's possible. But as I said, for that, you need to center it to within a tenth of a millimeter, the newly installed material must be precisely matched to the weight of the diaphragm in many tests, and the adhesive bonding must be absolutely perfect. If all that is correct, it will work. However, the frequency response of the 375 will still change. It will be usable at slightly lower frequencies, but it won't perform as well at the top end. I don't see the point in doing that.
The advantage of a field coil is the magnetic field does not sag when current is applied to the voice coil, if the power supply is properly regulated.No, and last but not least, I don't like field coil drivers.![]()
Ked have you heard any of the Hornsolution speakers ? I have always like the way their designs look.![]()
HelloThe trick is to use a more flexible surround, like Kapton.
Right!Yes people think that because WE was great, just by adding a field coil to a driver they will generate the same magic
Do you have a link ? I could not get you older Zero Distortion links to work the other day.Yes I have I would like to hear one with passive crossover. I also posted videos from a related system
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |