Hi Marc,Hi Miguel, the Brimar rectifier is very punchy so that would be a good choice. Not many know about the e80cc tube type, possibly as it was only made by two european manufacturers, however the regular Tungsram with yellow or red label would also work very well and is pretty cheap.
FYI only. Comparison of Tungsram E80CC, Amperex E80CC, and Amperex 7316PQ - Jon L - Tubes Asylum
FYI only. Comparison of Tungsram E80CC, Amperex E80CC, and Amperex 7316PQ - Jon L - Tubes Asylumwww.audioasylum.com
My Lampi BALTIC 3 came with the following tubes :
— RECTI : 5C3S
— OUTPUT : NO BRAND Chinese 12AU7s X 2
— INPUT : Chinese Psvane 6SN7GT Blue Balls X 2
View attachment 100900
Following your kind suggestions for my first complete set of rolling tubes for my Baltic 3 ( E11 ) with big hopes that would outperform the ones that came with Factory :
— RECTI : Brimar — 5Z4G 5Z4GY CV1863 KB/FE STC NOS BOXED VALVE TUBE 1972
— OUTPUT : Tungsram e80cc PAIR X 2
— INPUT : 1956 Soviet Military NOS MELZ 6H8C Metalbase tubes PAIR X 2
View attachment 100899
I founded that, yes first arriving, the Brimar Recti did impacted the sound in a good way, maintaining the marvelous B3 liquidity attribute and bringing a more balanced sound all around.
Then the Melz 1578 pair inputs : more detail and better focused, liquidity maintained ...
And last, the Tungsram e80cc ( Reds ), which hit another notch of focus, resolution and gain overall, but here is the interesting outcome, although the sound is more cohesive and neutral, i found that from the beginning when adding the e80cc there was this lack of liquidity that the Chinese had on table or perhaps they are not good or even not broken in enough, ? …BUT most importantly also more dryer, so liquidity diminished quite a bit — ( i thought that maybe the e80cc might have been damaged ?? ) --so today I started rolling the tubes and the only thing i took off initially was the Brimar and put the factory 5C3S instead back and although less focused the swap ended up in more liquid and satisfied listening, again.
Now im listening to my B3 with the factory CHINESE 12AU7s and the BRIMAR back in place...Liquidity is on the charts but also these Chinese are less focused and clear but apparently more ope, big and liquid than the e80cc narrow, higher gain, more resolution, focused and dryer presentation. This seems to conclude that Brimar + e80cc at least her in my system is equal less liquidity.
For me: Resolution, focus & higher gain are great but would really need the more open and liquid sound...
Questions :
--Any other choice variable of these e80cc or any other with this lacking characteristics : more open and liquid sound ?
--From New : how much time should these e80cc need to fully deliver their best ?
Another alternative to the lacking qualities of these e80cc ( if they should have it ) is that maybe these are damaged ? nevertheless i read somewhere about the dryness these Tungsram bring to the equation.
In the other hand and just for complementing info: my server is not even close to the TAIKO EXTREME but definitely is no slouch:
- Intel processor 8 core + Asus Rog Maximus XIII with TAIKO ATX powered by a Paul Hynes DR7T ( among some )
Thanks again
Miguel
Last edited: