Dear Ellie,
As a long-time follower of WBF I am glad you finally posted here!
Thank you very much for posting here, and for telling me of your long experience with the Mastersound PF100. I appreciate this report!
I spoke with Fernando Zorilla, the dealer in New Jersey (I think) who has listed the modified PF100s on Audiogon for a customer of his.
The modifications to those amps on Audiogon were made by an audio electronics technician in New York City -- by a guy named "Blackie" I think. He replaced the capacitors and he re-did all of the internal point-to-point wiring and he replaced the tube sockets, among other mods.
Blackie used custom-made deeper box cabinets for the amps to contain the various high-quality capacitors with which he replaced the stock capacitors in the PF100. The modifications looked very professional from what I could see in the photos on Audiogon.
Four 845 tubes in parallel produce more SET output power but SET purists prefer a single power tube to a quartet of paralleled tubes. So I am wondering if you have ever compared a stock PF100 or a modded PF100 to a high-power single tube SET such as the NAT Audio Magma New (170 wpc) or a Wavac 833 (150 wpc, but with high measured distortion above 10 watts or so).
The sensitivity of the Pendragon is 89dB, so it is quite a bit less sensitive than 93dB. The output of the PF100 is claimed to be 117 watts, I think. I have been thinking that about 150 watts should be the (relatively arbitrary) minimum output I should consider for the Pendragon ribbon panels.
Have you compared directly in your system the Absolute SET or the Absolare Push-Pull 85 to the PF100.
Is there any reason to think the sound quality of he PF100 would be better than the sound quality of a single-tube SET such as any of the Wavac 833 models?
Have you ever heard of the Amplifon 140 SET amplifier from Poland (I believe). This amp also uses the 833 tube (I think),
MasterSound I think is coming out soon with an updated version of the PF100 which will, I believe, use a better transformer and better capacitors.
Beyond the mods Blackie made to the amps listed on Audiogon what other modifications can possibly be made to the PF100?
What are the mods and details made to other PF100s of which you are aware,
Have you ever heard (or even heard of) the Alieno Ltd. 250 OTL an Italian amplifier which uses a big solid-state power supply and, in a separate chassis, one small input tube and one KT-150 and one 300B per channel to generate 250 wpc (somehow)?
Have you ever compared directly to the PF100 any output-transformer less (OTL) amplifier. (No matter how high is the quality of an output transformer I tend to be of the view that the best output transformer is no output transformer).
Are there other technicians who make significant parts upgrades and others modifications to the PF100 you are aware of, or is it only Blackie who does this work on PF100s?
Thank you, again, for your very informative and detailed post!
Best wishes,
Ron
Ron,
our 845 tubes in parallel produce more SET output power but SET purists prefer a single power tube to a quartet of paralleled tubes. So I am wondering if you have ever compared a stock PF100 or a modded PF100 to a high-power single tube SET such as the NAT Audio Magma New (170 wpc) or a Wavac 833 (150 wpc, but with high measured distortion above 10 watts or so).
I ve heard systems with the Wavac 833 and with big NAT, albeit not with my speakers, and not under the ideal conditions, and while those are good amps, in my opinion their sound is more in line with Line Magnetic 845 based amps level, so I would still take the Mastersound PFF100, over both, plus I am certain of successful PFF design, the quality of its transformers, and the brand's reliability record ...(not unimportant when exploring SET sound me thinks). So, the stock PFF 100 in my opinion would be superior to any of the above amps, the modded amp by Joshua would be on another, much higher level altogether with better transparency, resolution, truth of timbre, proper instrument separation and the actual illusion of the musical event, to use all the "required" audiophile cliches. ....If you have an itch to explore every possible SET amp, (and I understand that) then look into the British Icon Audio's MB81 SE monoblocks as well ... They are also more sanely priced as well, albeit I think they are made in China, but not 100% sure about that part....100 watts per channel and using a very same rugged Russian military (no jokes please
) GU type of tube as Wavac, Nat, et al. The Icon Audio also markets MB81 Push Pull Mono Blocks with 2 those GU tubes per channel for 250 watts of GU power.... How they sound I have NO idea thou, but worth keeping in mind.
As far as 150 watts of Wavac vs 110 watts of 845, I don't think the difference in db would be that significant....
As far as the modified versions of the PFF 100 selling on the audiogon, initially it looked like done by my dealer, who has done several mods like that , not sure about what is the exact topology in this case thou... , althou it does indeed looks a professionally done
copy of my dealer's work indeed.. My dealer is Joshua Cintron of scienceofsightandsound.com.. He is probably the best person in the whole world to talk to about modifying the PFF 100s to their fullest potential, (or any amp in general, as he has constructed for me a reference level solid state amp for summer listening, that is quite extraordinary, as I ve compared and preferred it to my then current references in the ss design: the Goldmund 3 (updated), Symphonic Line RG4&7s, Classe DR3-VHC, and Cello 50 monoblocks, just to give you a point of reference), as he has done the modded PFF100s with massive Delrin chassis add-on with a unique cascading cap power filters of his own design and other mods, for several audiophiles in NY and around the US. He also uses his own , much better internal wiring throughout than the stock PFF. Joshua also employs quite an unusual and novel engineering expertise and materials from military and NASA applications (although it makes the mods quite pricey for my own wallet, but compared to the daylight robbery type of pricing prevalent these days for hi fi, I d say its quite reasonable if you looking for the BEST, no pun intended
) and I ve heard his mods on the Tube Research Labs amps that made them reliable (a feat onto itself as anyone who has owned TRL can attest, with stamp of approval from Paul Weitzel himself) and even better sounding.... He will probably give you great tips on whats the best possible speaker cables for the amp/Pendragon system (he used to be a dealer for Gryphon I think, back in the 90s if memory serves me right), and he is extremely knowledgeable in all aspects of the ultimate system & room acoustics building in your category (as I can attest personally). I may not agree with him on everything audio, and video related, but its usually a matter of listener's & watcher's perspective….
Paul of the USA tube audio is also very knowledgeable about the "stock" amps of many brands, as they have carried many brands and although they are now actively promoting their own Ayon line of amps (which in IMHO still not as good as the Masterdound), Paul is very, very accommodating and patient....
MasterSound I think is coming out soon with an updated version of the PF100 which will, I believe, use a better transformer and better capacitors.
If you decide to go the ultimate with the PFF 100s , Joshua's modded amps will still be much better sounding amps than any by the factory. I guess the Mastersound will implement the version that they ve used with their anniversary model last year and used carbon sides instead of the wood planks and lots more chrome, and an "updated" version of wire in the transformers.... From people that have listened to that anniversary version I heard there was very little difference if any at all, compared to the "regular" one....
Have you compared directly in your system the Absolute SET or the Absolare Push-Pull 85 to the PF100?
Not in my own system, ... I only heard the aforementioned amps during the various shows, but I can tell when I hear something extraordinary, even during the show conditions, and while pleasant there was nothing of the kind .. Same with Viva... Once again : a pretty design does not make an amplifier great .... Lots of gear sounds lovely and spacey, and "3d" with perfectly recorded audiophile crap, but when the going gets rough with the "real" music, then how does the component perform?! The Mastersound amp in my system makes even compressed web stream of some of mine favorite radio stations (France musique la contemporaine at 192kbs, St Petersburg Marinsky's direct feed at 256 kps, and Amsterdams Royal Concertgebouw at 256 kps, and WQXRs Carnegi Hall live feeds) as thou I am present where the microphones are. They also make Sonic Youth sound like you are with them in the studio (before only the best EL 34 based amps have given me me such an illusion). Now that to me is the ultimate test: feed Sonic Youth or the Sex Pistols or Glenn Branca, et al, to other SET amps (with non horns naturally), crank the volume and see what you get!!!!! (n I still recall what happened when the highly touted British Olympian horn tried to play hip hop, and utterly crapped out!!!!!) The only SET amps that could be competitive with the Mastersounds IMHO are the JAdis NEC 845 and those are only 40 watts per channel. Also, I think the PFFs 117 watt is a bit optimistic, despite their designer telling me that to be the case, I ve yet to see them measured, as the Italians are not the Swiss yet.....
Have you ever heard of the Amplifon 140 SET amplifier from Poland (I believe). This amp also uses the 833 tube (I think)
No, I have not. Not to take anything away from them, and they very well could be of superb quality indeed, but there is a mushrooms-after- the-rain like wave of 833 tube designs of questionable reliability and pedigree coming out of the Eastern Europe these days. There is also a Russian version using those tubes as well don’t recall its name, , as well as the one made with pride in my own neighboring Brooklyn, by (also a Russian emigre naturally, hehe) an ex Sound by Singer tech Alex Chorin, AlexusAudio.com I think.... They have exhibited during NY shows few times, and sound was very, very refined…
Have you ever heard (or even heard of) the Alieno Ltd. 250 OTL an Italian amplifier which uses a big solid-state power supply and, in a separate chassis, one small input tube and one KT-150 and one 300B per channel to generate 250 wpc (somehow)?
No I have not , although to be frank, I seldom take seriously designs using tubes other than KT-66, EL-34, and 845/211..... Not that
that particular amp cant be great sounding with your speakers of course,
Have you ever compared directly to the PF100 any output-transformer less (OTL) amplifier. (No matter how high is the quality of an output transformer I tend to be of the view that the best output transformer is no output transformer).
The best OTL amps that I ve heard were the Sans Pareil amps in the 90s, and the designs by Harvey Rosenberg (his amps and premps actually made original musical event
better by somehow adding those distortions and/or harmonics that constructed the musical event with such an ambient presence that I doubt was even there to begin with! But it sounded wicked awesome!). I am sure you know that OTL amps are so speaker/impedance specific that its very difficult to compare those two... I guess each can sound glorious with its matched speakers, but the PFF 100s can be considered as do it all amp, while OTL will highly unlikely to reveal the full potential of your Pendragons. However the PFF 100 , Tube Research Labs Gt-200&400&800 and the sadly long out of production Swiss Ensemble Corifeo amp have been the only amps I ve heard, that have managed to portray similar dimensional presence of the Futterman design into non horn speaker designs . NYAL preamp designs are still the ultimate in that regards thou... If you seek the OTL holy grail, seek the Jadis Eurythmie of the 2000s ( the most coherent horn designs I ve ever heard, and Sans Pareil amps). Of the modern OTLs I ve heard have been the italian Graaf and the Einstein ( prefer the PFF 100 to both of those by a wide margin).
Before I decided to settle on my Mastersound, I considered and auditioned these extensively: Red Rose Model Ref 1 monoblocks, Air Tight ATM-3 monoblocks, Nestorovic NA-1 monoblocks, and Tube Research Labs GT-100&200 just to give you my point of reference.... PFF 100 were out of my price range at that point of time...
I think this is all, sorry could not be more specific regarding some amps of your interest vs pff100. Let me know if have further comments and questions. Hope this helps…..
Regards,
Ellie