This is all due to wind and solar generated power. You can’t expect stable power (voltage and frequency) unless hydro electric or nuclear generated power. There is just too much variation in the solar panels and in the wind turbines. Nowadays most energy producers have recognized this problem and are putting up BIG battery packs at each solar and wind turbine sites to even out the peaks and dips in voltage, before letting it out on the power grid. Frequency however is much harder to get right and stable, specially when you have all this switching back and forward between AC and DC and back to AC. Now the power companies see even greater problems with harmonics in the super high frequency range, way out of our natural hearing range, but due in fact affects the lower frequencies as well. All this is due to DC switching devices, not seen before when power was mostly produced by nuclear, hydro, coal or other forms of very stable energy sources. Many times you hear people say, ””it was better back then””, but when it comes to power production, it WAS actually better back then.
/ Jk
It almost looks like a political post.
We might as well throw refugees and electric vehicles in there.
I can certainly see how a cloud or a lull in the wind reduces energy.
But a lot of big industry has moved out of the US.
However every other driveway has a Tesla, or other EV, pulling down energy from the grid.
And how much has the grid changed in the last 10, 20, 30 or 40 years? If there are more people, then there should be more load.
Also ACs were relatively absent a half century ago, whereas now almost every house has an AC running.
And handfuls of switching power supplies in each house.
It seems like there are a lot of variables and there should be some factual studies to point to in order to explain whether the fluctuations are more, and then if so, then why they have increased.
But my impression is that the infrastructure has not kept up with the required load/need??
And I do not recall rolling brownouts in decades past.
I certainly like the idea of solar and wind, but nuclear is pretty hard to beat.
And it is odd that 90% of the hard core environmentalists do not like the idea of nuclear.
There are none of those CO2 things coming out of a smoke stack, so I would have expected that the climate change crowd would abide those as an alternative to fossil fuels at least in the near term… however that group is generally anti beef (for the methane), anti this and anti that.
We certainly need some real solutions rather than a list of things that we are against.
In the mean time, everyone that does not have a battery stabilised electrical grid just seems to run a device in the house to provide some stable power.