Did you hear any on stats, Andrew?
I had my Silvaweld OTLs on my Acoustat 1+1 and it sounded heavenly...but hotter than hell!
Did you hear any on stats, Andrew?
Although not fully class A - no true tube OTL of significant power can be class A when using your speakers - the MA-2 is biased at 1.2A - much more than common class A/B tube or SS amplifier. It is what was called a very enriched class A/B amplifier, most of time working in class A.
Why going for an expensive and hard to get tube (the 6C33) when you can use the well sounding, cheap, reliable and safe 6AS7?
I see that the Tenor 75 OTL used 6C33C tubes!
I think I rest my case (Joule Electra and Tenor) that for some reason the 6C33C OTL amps sound less lean than the 6SN7 OTL amps.
6C33Cs are cheap and plentiful in fact.
You mean 6AS7 I think Ron. 6SN7 is a small signal tube (input and driver). Atmasphere uses the 6AS7. Einstein and Graaf also used 6C33C and are not lush sounding...
I talked with Ralph today, and he was very patient and informative and very helpful. Ralph thinks that the sound of the Novacron and the sound of the M-60 are very similar. If anything, he said, the M-60 might be slightly sweeter on the top end.
He fully rejected my theory of any consistent sonic difference between 6C33C output tubes and 6AS7 output tubes.
I suggested to him that, since virtually everybody loves the crystalline transparency of OTL, there are only three possible reasons why not every tube-preferring audiophile in the world uses his amplifiers: 1) cost, 2) speaker incompatibility or 3) preference for the rounded, more bloomy sound of output transformer-coupled tube amplifiers, over the neutrality of Ralph's OTL amplifiers.
Ralph pretty much agreed with this and added that he simply has no interest in the warmer colouration imparted by output transformers.
I agree with that. But I was focusing on the midrange transparency of OTL versus the midrange richness of transformer output tube amps.
This is incomplete imo as OTLs have other idiosyncrasies. See the common recommendation of Speltz autoformers in order to increase speaker impedance (which can't be 100% transparent of course). OTLs are often lacking in bass too. So is this complete neutrality? Not so sure.
Ralph's amps are third harmonic (as he will tell you) which is more "neutrality" to some. To those who prefer second harmonic it sounds lean. I don't think it's the OPT. Plenty of really good iron out there too.
I think needing to increase speaker impedance would be covered by 2) speaker incompatibility.
I was not aware OTLs are often lacking in bass. I certainly did not have that feeling with Danny's Einsteins driving Alexxes.
The third harmonic point is an excellent one and, in fact, Ralph said this himself. But no OPT tube amplifier I have ever heard approaches the clarity of the OTL I have heard. Why do you think it is not the OPT? Maybe it is the OPT supplemented by the second harmonic distortion of the SET?
If not the OPT to what do you attribute that incredible crystalline transparency of the OTL?
I think needing to increase speaker impedance would be covered by 2) speaker incompatibility.
I was not aware OTLs are often lacking in bass. I certainly did not have that feeling with Danny's Einsteins driving Alexxes.
The third harmonic point is an excellent one and, in fact, Ralph said this himself. But no OPT tube amplifier I have ever heard approaches the clarity of the OTL I have heard. Why do you think it is not the OPT? Maybe it is the OPT supplemented by the second harmonic distortion of the SET?
If not the OPT to what do you attribute that incredible crystalline transparency of the OTL?
This is incomplete imo as OTLs have other idiosyncrasies. See the common recommendation of Speltz autoformers in order to increase speaker impedance (which can't be 100% transparent of course). OTLs are often lacking in bass too. So is this complete neutrality? Not so sure.
Ralph's amps are third harmonic (as he will tell you) which is more "neutrality" to some. To those who prefer second harmonic it sounds lean. I don't think it's the OPT. Plenty of really good iron out there too.
I talked with Ralph today, and he was very patient and informative and very helpful. Ralph thinks that the sound of the Novacron and the sound of the M-60 are very similar. If anything, he said, the M-60 might be slightly sweeter on the top end.
He fully rejected my theory of any consistent sonic difference between 6C33C output tubes and 6AS7 output tubes.
I suggested to him that, since virtually everybody loves the crystalline transparency of OTL, there are only three possible reasons why not every tube-preferring audiophile in the world uses his amplifiers: 1) cost, 2) speaker incompatibility or 3) preference for the rounded, more bloomy sound of output transformer-coupled tube amplifiers, over the neutrality of Ralph's OTL amplifiers.
Ralph pretty much agreed with this and added that he simply has no interest in the warmer colouration imparted by output transformers.
(...) I was not aware OTLs are often lacking in bass. I certainly did not have that feeling with Danny's Einsteins driving Alexxes.
The third harmonic point is an excellent one and, in fact, Ralph said this himself. But no OPT tube amplifier I have ever heard approaches the clarity of the OTL I have heard. Why do you think it is not the OPT? Maybe it is the OPT supplemented by the second harmonic distortion of the SET?
If not the OPT to what do you attribute that incredible crystalline transparency of the OTL?