Good stuff. Thanks to you, I have the Acme 274B incoming. I'm also thinking about giving the Acme 300B a shot since I've heard good things about it from the Line Magnetic forums.
Good stuff. Thanks to you, I have the Acme 274B incoming. I'm also thinking about giving the Acme 300B a shot since I've heard good things about it from the Line Magnetic forums.
Unfortunately, the Tak has been sold so it will only me a comparison from memory. I've never used Tak 300bs, but I have Elrog 300bs in my amp, which weren't exceptional in the GG 2 DAC. If the Acme 300Bs are similar to their 805s, I have a feeling they will do well in the DAC.
As of today we have an additional data point regarding Tac and ACME 274b...very close actually where Tac is clear winner but ACME in the territory cost for bang is above. If you wan to squeeze last 5% of the performance you'll use Tac for rest ACME is just phenomenal. Tried in TRP today not Pacific but for Pacific I have one nice thing to try out
To be honest that would be the only proper way as we did so many of those that i’m lost...and now they appear in several diff threads so it makes it even worse to follow
To be honest that would be the only proper way as we did so many of those that i’m lost...and now they appear in several diff threads so it makes it even worse to follow
As of today we have an additional data point regarding Tac and ACME 274b...very close actually where Tac is clear winner but ACME in the territory cost for bang is above. If you wan to squeeze last 5% of the performance you'll use Tac for rest ACME is just phenomenal. Tried in TRP today not Pacific but for Pacific I have one nice thing to try out View attachment 58309
As of today we have an additional data point regarding Tac and ACME 274b...very close actually where Tac is clear winner but ACME in the territory cost for bang is above. If you wan to squeeze last 5% of the performance you'll use Tac for rest ACME is just phenomenal. Tried in TRP today not Pacific but for Pacific I have one nice thing to try out View attachment 58309
Could you pls explain what you meant by 10%? I guess its entirely new tube with better quality overall. Very relaxed and smooth and more forgiving than rest. I had a feeling whichever output one i plug in it just performs and with RK i did not have same feeling..and RK is more punchy and nervous somehow vs ACME
Could you pls explain what you meant by 10%? I guess its entirely new tube with better quality overall. Very relaxed and smooth and more forgiving than rest. I had a feeling whichever output one i plug in it just performs and with RK i did not have same feeling..and RK is more punchy and nervous somehow vs ACME
Could you pls explain what you meant by 10%? I guess its entirely new tube with better quality overall. Very relaxed and smooth and more forgiving than rest. I had a feeling whichever output one i plug in it just performs and with RK i did not have same feeling..and RK is more punchy and nervous somehow vs ACME
Thank you, then it’s something for me, in my system the sound with RK 5u4g has sometimes too much of attack , depending on the recording and my mood
I already ordered Acme 274 B, the regular price is 295 usd plus shipment but there is also the possibility to buy best of 10 % selection for 345 usd which I finally choose.