my urge to think about better vinyl gear can never be quieted. i'm hard wired that way. so i still dream sometimes, but then lay down till that feeling passes. or listen to my lovely vinyl. or go out and sit in my motorhome.

Mike … Would not your “never to be quieted” quest for the suggested ultimate vinyl transcription not lead you to visit the reportedly evolved “Sound Of Nothing” turntable … You once having previously moved rather close to securing its predecessor the AS 2000 ?
 
(...) OTOH if you have 12,000 compelling reasons to love vinyl like i do, then the music talks very loudly on where the focus is.

Well people listening to Qobuz will tell you they have 100 million compelling reasons to love digital, including 185,000 albums in Hi-Res audio

(...) Quite often LPs can sound better than the digital release for the simple reason the master tape degraded between the release of the two. (...)

The main reason I will keep vinyl playback in my system - the other being nostalgia and some respect and love for rituals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Atmasphere
Mike … Would not your “never to be quieted” quest for the suggested ultimate vinyl transcription not lead you to visit the reportedly evolved “Sound Of Nothing” turntable … You once having previously moved rather close to securing its predecessor the AS 2000 ?
nope. i chose the motorhome + related commitments to more vinyl quest pain. and in any case not sure there is a next step, or if so whether that would be it.....for me.

there is myth and legend and process. that one belongs in that discussion. a few others too. including maybe my T1. might be a dozen to ponder. i can still do that. ponder....that is.
 
Last edited:
Well people listening to Qobuz will tell you they have 100 million compelling reasons to love digital, including 185,000 albums in Hi-Res audio
which i have and really enjoy too. so i know where that fits in compared to my vinyl. and my personal view is that it does not quite reach my 12,000 pressing level. i know that is not your view.
The main reason I will keep vinyl playback in my system - the other being nostalgia and some respect and love for rituals.
says the man seriously considering a further huge commitment to digital. hope you pull the trigger. i did.
 
nope. i chose the motorhome + related commitments to more vinyl quest pain. and in any case not sure there is a next step, or if so whether that would be it.....for me.

there is myth and legend and process. that one belongs in that discussion. a few others too. including maybe my T1. might be a dozen to ponder. i can still do that. ponder....that is.

Yup … Makes sense to me .
 
mine, yes.

like to? i will always 'like to'. yet.......

Peter, i'd say i am at my vinyl performance destination. when i listen to it i am consistently taken by it. the superb musical connection is fresh and new to me. i realize there are likely some mini steps out there to be had if i were still on the hunt. would i hear a difference between what i have and those next steps? maybe, probably. but maybe not. they would be very expensive and not compatible with my retirement lifestyle. would they be worth worrying about? unlikely. but vinyl development is probably not done. nor do i want it to be.

i moved from the Saskia to the Esoteric T1 so i could have three arms and it could be my last tt. i do view it as my end game. also love the CS Port too for it's own sake.

until i processed (cleaned and curated) my acquired 3000 pressing classical collection last summer i did feel i wanted to acquire more great sounding classical pressings. but now that itch has been fully scratched and i'm not looking for more pressings. i am more than fulfilled. so i feel i'm also at my vinyl media destination.

my urge to think about better vinyl gear can never be quieted. i'm hard wired that way. so i still dream sometimes, but then lay down till that feeling passes. or listen to my lovely vinyl. or go out and sit in my motorhome.

I am glad to read it Mike. You have scratched more itches than most of us have. There is always the "what if?". Enjoy the peace of knowing you have explored much and can now relax, listen, and enjoy what you have collected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike Lavigne
I should point out something you are not taking into account.

1) Guitar amps are not built to be hifi. There is often intention to build the amp to make distortion rather than to avoid it.
2) When any tube is driven, for example a power tube, the input capacitance increases with the drive. If the driver circuit isn't adequate to the task you will see crossover distortion in a push pull design. That is a design criteria; IOW a design flaw if the amp is meant to be hifi.

The video does not use much in the way of examples; your remonstration thus based on a logical fallacy.

We went round and round on this very topic on this thread yet you persist. I put you on ignore for this sort of thing; since there are two problems, the first famously outlined by an American author named Samuel Clemens. The second problem is when you are presented with technical information, you simply ignore it. I am hoping this is not done out of malice but the alternative, by Hanlon's Razor, isn't great either. You can chose ignorance or you can chose to learn. Its up to you.

Read this article. It disagrees with you about feedback improving zero crossing distortion. It also demonstrates why it is a bigger problem at low levels.

"The only point is to demonstrate that negative feedback can Never eliminate crossover distortion, because if both driver/ output devices are turned off, the circuit has no (useful) gain."



"Most audio power amplifiers suffer from a defect known as "crossover distortion". This distortion is particularly troublesome at low output levels. At low power levels, the crossover distortion can rise to a high percentage of the output level and become the dominant source of distortion."

"Crossover distortion is particularly insidious in that it is not usually harmonic. The timing of the 0-current crossover events is a function of all of the frequencies being reproduced by the amplifier. This interaction causes intermodulation distortion (IMD) which is much more audible than harmonic distortion (THD). The distortion tones produced by IMD do not occur where our ears expect to hear distortion. IMD can cause two musical instruments to interact in a way that produces distortion tones that are never naturally produced by either instrument. For this reason, IMD sounds unnatural and unmusical to our ears."

"Crossover distortion can create fast transients that are too short to be corrected by a feedback network. The feedback network can actually extend the period of time over which the error occurs. Most class-AB amplifiers will show crossover distortion artifacts that have been stretched in time by ringing in the feedback network."


So, I don't agree with your assessment that crossover distortion is like other distortions that can be dealt with using negative feedback and it is independent of level, so it impacts low level signals predominantly.

screenshot_2025-03-11_121543.png

This what I am talking about. Notice the top trace is the sine wave output and the bottom trace is the residual with the waveform notched out. You didn't do this, nor can you with an analog scope!

It's inherent in how transistors are non-linear in turn on and shutoff. Here are many examples of even so-called Class AB that have zero-crossing distortion. If you don't put enough bias then it is guaranteed to be there.



The Class AB mode for this amp has zero crossing distortion and the Class A mode does not.







Again, AB has zero crossing distortion and Class A doesn't.


As you can see, many modern amps suffer this problem even ones called Class AB. Probably only the Naim would claim to be Class B.

The amps that are Class AB and showing zero crossing distortion are ones where the bias has been set too low and they are not completely eliminating the zero crossing distortion as the transistors are now in a quite non-linear region of their transfer function. You can call this poor design if you want but it shows clearly what happens when the bias is set too low...exactly what you get in Class B. However, it is likely there is always residual crossover distortion unless you bias at full Class A.

Doug Self lists the 8 types of distortion mechanisms when he is discussing his "blameless amplifier"

TABLE 1.
SOURCE ORDER SLOPE ORIGIN
1 Input stage (balanced) 3rd-order 18dB/oct Inherent
Input stage (unbalanced) 2nd-order 12dB/oct Inherent
2 Voltage Amplifier Stage 2nd-order 6dB/oct Inherent
3a Output stage LSN (4 Ohm) 3rd-order 6dB/oct Inherent
3b Output stage crossover Complex 6dB/oct Inherent
3c Output stage switchoff Complex Variable Inherent
4 Non-linear VAS loading Complex Flat Inherent
5 Decouple return in ground Even Flat Topological
6 Rail induction Even 6dB/oct Topological
7 Wrong feedback point Even Flat Topological
8 Capacitor non-linearity Odd 12dB/oct Inherent

The distortions we have been discussing are distortions 3a, 3b and 3c, which he lists as "inherent", meaning they are fundamental to transistor function.

He then states: "In a field like Audio where consensus of any sort is rare, it is widely acknowledged that crossover distortion is the worst problem afflicting Class-B power amplifiers. The pernicious nature of crossover distortion is that it occurs over a small part of the transfer characteristic, and so generates high-order harmonics. Worse still, this range is around the zero-crossing, so it is present at all levels, the THD percentage potentially increasing as output level falls, threatening very poor linearity at low powers."

Furthermore: "To further get the measure of the problem, Fig 23 shows how HF distortion is greatly reduced by increasing the load resistance, providing further confirmation that almost all the 8 Ohm distortion originates as crossover in the output stage."

So, a typical loudspeaker load makes the situation worse and particularly at high frequencies. The lower the impedance, the worse it gets for a Class B amp.


Finally: "This leaves Distortion 3, in its three components, as the only distortion that is in any sense unavoidable, as Class-B stages free from crossover artifacts are so far beyond us."


THat sums it up. He found a way to mostly eliminate all the distortions on his list EXCEPT distortion 3, which are inherent traits of transistors when running Class B.

Doug Self, himself, has declared that avoiding zero crossing distortion in Class B transistor amps is IMPOSSIBLE with current semiconductor technology.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Holmz

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing