YESShall I get decent turntable instead of upgrading my digital source?
But that's my interest bias too
YESShall I get decent turntable instead of upgrading my digital source?
any more feedback you can give on the effect of the clock? was it a one button on-off sort of thing, or did they need to plug and un-plug cables?Esoteric turntable is something speciall with magnetic gravitation,separate power supply and option of external clock to control servo motor.
They also played Led Zeppelin with and without external clock.
It sounds much more clear and dynamic with external clock engaged,
Turntable cost 80k$ and external clock cost another 25k$ but they are worth the money.
With remote, he can turn it on and off.any more feedback you can give on the effect of the clock? was it a one button on-off sort of thing, or did they need to plug and un-plug cables?
I quit vinyl 30 years ago.YES
But that's my interest bias too
thank you. very interesting.With remote, he can turn it on and off.
Very handy.
The difference is quite noticable.
I willthank you. very interesting.
if you think of any other impressions about the clock please post them.
I have owned the Devialet Phantoms for over 5 years now. I got it for my spouse who uses it everyday. I have to admit they sound quite good. I have a pair of large Quad 2905 electrostatics next to them, which look a bit silly next to the Phantoms. Of course, Quads have a special sound, particularly the 5” tall 2905s. But the Quads are ugly as sin, and a pain to drive. If they go bust, they’re expensive as hell to fix. It starts to add up eventually.View attachment 105540
I had never listened to Devialet spherical speakers in person before Seoul Audio show.
Small spherical speakers filled the pretty large space.
Although it is not for pure audiophile like me, it will get favor from young people.
(...) Esoteric turntable is something speciall with magnetic gravitation,separate power supply and option of external clock to control servo motor.
They also played Led Zeppelin with and without external clock.
It sounds much more clear and dynamic with external clock engaged,
Turntable cost 80k$ and external clock cost another 25k$ but they are worth the money.
External clocks are much high quality than internal one.If a turntable controller sounds much better with an external clock we can be tempted to think there is a problem with the internal clock ... What is the reason they present for such difference?
this review gets into the weeds about what is special about this particular clock. i'll be interested in how your much greater technically informed viewpoint than mine sees this.If a turntable controller sounds much better with an external clock we can be tempted to think there is a problem with the internal clock ... What is the reason they present for such difference?
this review gets into the weeds about what is special about this particular clock. i'll be interested in how your much greater technically informed viewpoint than mine sees this.
then watch this video.
a question, just for sh*ts and giggles;Well, clocks for digital DAC's are a well known, well explained and accepted subject, both technically and subjectively . But we do not see any connection between the 10 MHz clock stability and turntable motor drive stability. All I see is a nebulous try to associate their well known DAC performance to their turntable performance.
We are addressing am electromechanical inertial system, not a DAC supplying an analog signal to the amplification
a question, just for sh*ts and giggles;
lets just say you first heard the T1 turntable and were impressed with it's speed stability and flow. it was awesome sounding. and you've owned the EMT 927, so you know your turntable flow.
then someone brings in this clock and clearly it's takes things to another level. easy to A/B and no denying it.
do you then assume that the basic speed controller is flawed and this clock is fixing it? or is it just an over-the-top enhancement? at what point do we give the clock it's due, verses knocking the power supply design?