I think he means more 40-70 watts PSET and not a circlotron design like the VA200
SET amp owners thread
- Thread starter bonzo75
- Start date
I would have said the same about my crossfire III until about 10 months ago when I got the Genus.
Thanks!
The feet are Herbie's iso-ball, the firm cup with "supersonic hardball" balls, which are some sort of extremely hard rubber ball. They're as good as any footer I've used, but I haven't tried some platforms others have really liked. Footers and isolation is interesting, I've had good luck with isolating speakers using IsoAcoustics stands and using harder footers for components.
Although the needs of selection will always depend on the circuit , most of the time the gain (or transconductance) is critical in small signal tubes. Even in circuits with some negative feedback, that apparently compensate for differences in gain, the sound signature depends on the gain of the tubes. Many times I have seen large differences in distorttion spectra between left and right channels in tube preamplifiers due to tube mismatch. Stereophile measurements sometimes also show it. But yes, noisy tubes are unusable.
From experience a tube, same type, same manufacturer, can measure similarly but sound different.I was not addressing push- pull amplifiers , but tubes in parallel - this is a SET thread!
When you replace the tube the other tube, even of the same brand , the tube is not exactly the same but still sounds the same. Saying "similarly" is this case is like explaining that an helicopter can fly comparing it with a fixed wing aircraft.
Do not assume all tubes sound alike even when they measure closely and swapping tubes left to right may bring better sound quality.
Just treat each tube as unique.
Blue58
Just testing my Xmas present, iPad Pro 11”
Wow, thanks. If I may ask, are you tweaking by yourself or with the help of Ze'ev? Reason I ask is someone like me may struggle. Are you planning to experiments with the other midrange drivers as well like the Voxatix or sticking to the Horn?
Thanks Bill,
I wanted a very clean look without lots of screws. Only wish I could achieve the level of finish as on the Thomas Mayer amps.
Guys, I bought them BECAUSE I thought they do have potentialI told him the same thing back when he bought them
Hi! This is a good remark, but it depends on what you measure. A simple emission or transconductance test does not tell much about the overall condition of the tube but only tests one op point. A better comparison is the measurement of the entire set of plate curves. When the set of curves are identical still a sound difference might be there if the tubes have different grid current (different quality of vacuum). If the amplifier circuit is sensitive to that the tubes can still sound different, however a well designed driver in an amp can easily handle different amounts of grid current so that they do not impact sound quality. This is the reason I prefer rather strong driver tubes, preferable a second power tube.
Your remark is vary valuable for those who compare different brands of tubes and conclude a general sound character of a brand form that comparison.
Thomas
I dunno Barry - I think they look right up there externally. Any shots of the internals?
Ze’ev who is one of the owners of PAP came to visit our factory a few months back. Unfortunately, I was out of town at the time but Richard and Mino gave him a tour and then they all spent some time in the reference room listening to the Quintet. At this time we were using the Constellation kit to power them. We had already started some mod experiments so we demonstrated them to him. The first, obviously, was using our VTX, hollow tube, wiring to cable the speakers. We used 12 gauge to the woofers and a 16VTX-FEP to the Horn1. Then, we demonstrated the mod to the crossover PCB. We had modified one PCB and left the other stock. This is the Leonidas crossover BTW. We played a mono signal and switched from one speaker to the other. The difference in clarity and transparency was OBVIOUS to everyone. Ze’ev was a bit startled by the result and was certain that we had made some other change so Mino had him examine the speakers and the crossovers. Easy to do since the PAP open baffle design leaves everything exposed.
Ze’ev apparently is or has already developed different baffles for the speaker. I think he said something about using wood normally used in a piano. Of course I would love to give those a try. But we are doing something a bit different as we have our own ideas that we want to play around with. We are making a single, monolithic baffle for all the drivers from layered bamboo stock. And with it a support frame and platform made from the same material. We intend to make a hole in the support platform for the crossover and suspend it (float it) with some of the polymer isolation straps we use for the DF-SS cable support product.
Last edited:
Agreed, I was trying to make a general point. Section to section transconductance is ideally matched but if it is say, within 10% section to section I worry more about the noise.
Finding section to section matched tubes is very difficult with NOS as we don't have the populations to choose from. We then have to worry about the construction variants of the same tube and our obsession with that. Life goes on.
Cheers.
Similar threads
