I've heard that plastic sucks too. I guess that means contact lenses are out.I think you raise a very interesting question.
I have always believed that nothing good comes from having glass in the listening room. Maybe this includes eyeglasses?
I've heard that plastic sucks too. I guess that means contact lenses are out.I think you raise a very interesting question.
I have always believed that nothing good comes from having glass in the listening room. Maybe this includes eyeglasses?
Over on Audiogon a couple of years ago some folks swore that not having their cell phone in the same room made a significant difference in SQ.
I think you raise a very interesting question.
I have always believed that nothing good comes from having glass in the listening room. Maybe this includes eyeglasses?
Make your glasses fit loose it’s simple@Pokey77, thanks for the reply. I had an old pair of John Lennon glasses (small round lenses and very thin wiry arms) that I tried. Same effect, but to a lesser degree. Now the effect was only pronounced in the front - a hardening of vocals and drums in particular. The sides seemed less/unaffected. Again, I spent much of yesterday listening to music and found myself with the specs off for the majority of the listening.
But you could be right - certainly when I place the glasses on there's the immediate distraction of something clinging to my face that might be modifying my experience, but for now I remain convinced about what I'm hearing and will continue this experiment a while longer.
The consensus so far amongst those who have tested (thanks!) is that there is no difference. But intriguingly, there are hints that others have the same recommendation - remove the specs.
I wonder whether my speakers are involved - I'm using Martin Logan electrostatics and a subwoofer in between them. The sub, in particular, will be putting a lot of pressure into the room, which the frames might be picking up and vibrating into the skull. And/or perhaps the lack of information from side wall reflections from the electrostatics is at play here, with the direct information from them being modified by the specs in a more audible way.
I would prefer it to be my imagination, as I cannot see much without my glasses, making it a bit of a hassle to have them off!
So, there was a company that actually made a product to do just what you are asking back in the 80s. They used leather to extend or bend the ear forward, I forget exactly what they were doing. But one side was smooth to increase the effect and the other was rough to lessen it. Sometimes when I think a track does not have enough treble information, I'll just bend my ears forward and listen to the effect, sometimes I like it and sometimes I don't. Anyway, great thought Rex.I have wondered why no one makes a mold to put behind your ears to modify their angle. Just bending your ears has a lot larger affect than glasses. It significantly pronounces the highs.
I find when I am critically listening I always tilt my head a little down. I close my eyes. I shift my body forward so my head is positioned in front of the rest of me and the chair.So am I to assume all the rest of implausible and non scientific theories are ok just saying and I’m still waiting for anyone to try holding ur head or wearing a hat
lol
Wearing glasses is akin to someone standing in front of your system, obstructing the sound. Maybe two or three people.
I think you raise a very interesting question.
I have always believed that nothing good comes from having glass in the listening room. Maybe this includes eyeglasses?
I have always believed that nothing good comes from having glass in the listening room.
decades ago they would drink in earthen pots, maybe audiophiles should use those, take out all light bulbs, and no laptop or mobile in the room.
Marty, thanks for your interest and attention.As an ophthalmologist, I can say with certainty that in nearly 40 years of practice, I have never heard of such a complaint. But to be fair, I don't think I've had any critical audiophiles as patients. Thus, your observation caught my attention.
There are 2 things that I'd ask:
With my finger resting gently on the side/top of the ear (near the antihelix from an image on Google?), when I push the specs into place them I can certainly feel pressure from the arms pushing the ear/finger outwards ever so slightly.1) Is the thickness of the arms of your glasses that fit between your hear and your ear different? A very slight difference in thickness may move the pinna of the ear ever so slightly, and may possibly account for the differences you hear between the old and new glass.
This was my thought too when looking for causes. From my seating position I do feel that the frames impinge on the "light of sight" from speaker to ear. But I also tried a pair of John Lennon glasses, which wouldn't have the same effect, yet felt they also changed the sound, but by a lesser degree. So, I now wonder whether 1) above might be playing into it more, as my ear is clearly moved outwards by the arm of the specs, which might account for the majority of the hearing changes?2) When I look at your avatar, it appears that the edge of your glass frames may actually be in the direct path of sound as it enters the outside of the ear canal from the front, particularly on your left side. I wonder, do your new glasses have perhaps more of an overlap to the entry of the ear canal from the front? (Keep in mind very people actually hold their head perfectly centered so depending on the accuracy of the picture versus reality when you listen, this effect might occur on either side).
Don't know whether to be flattered or offendedthis is hereby nominated as the most stupid and meaningless thread ever worldwide