That's a single sweep correction. I don't trust multi seat music listening since I don't understand how the time domain can be optimized from multiple seats. I'm very happy with the music in my room!
I agree Acourate is more flexible and I plan to crack it open again. AL is great because I can get really sweet filters very fast. I can try out various setups and create zones in Jriver in just a few minutes. I don't need to worry about cfg files. I am a happy owner of both.
I bet your system sounds great. Have you tried rolling off the bass below 20hz? I have been having some interesting email exchanges with Mitch Barnett about rumble filters.
I agree Acourate is more flexible and I plan to crack it open again. AL is great because I can get really sweet filters very fast. I can try out various setups and create zones in Jriver in just a few minutes. I don't need to worry about cfg files. I am a happy owner of both.
I bet your system sounds great. Have you tried rolling off the bass below 20hz? I have been having some interesting email exchanges with Mitch Barnett about rumble filters.
do you do a single seat measurement in audiolense or multiseat?
I use acourate & have been playing with trying to correct the phase response of a passive speaker recently. The thing I like about acourate is the seemingly bottomless pit of things to experiment with (albeit if you know how to experiment with it). FWIW my current response is as follows, my room is untreated (except for normal furnishing) hence the somewhat wriggly mid range.
View attachment 19128