Supplements Tied to Higher Prostate Cancer Risk

Steve Williams

Site Founder, Site Owner, Administrator
By Danielle Krol, M.D. ABC News

A new study might have men thinking twice about taking supplements.
The study, published today in the Journal of National Cancer Institute, links the micronutrients selenium and vitamin E to an increased risk of prostate cancer - a disease the supplements were once thought to prevent.

The finding is the latest to come out of the SELECT Trial, an ongoing study of more than 35,000 American men aged 55 and older. The trial started on the hunch that certain supplements might reduce the risk of prostate cancer. But initial results in 2008 suggested that selenium and vitamin E, taken alone or together, did not prevent prostate cancer. In fact vitamin E supplements appeared to raise the risk of the disease by 17 percent.
At the time, participants were instructed to stop taking these supplements but to keep checking in with the researchers. Now, more than five years later, it appears supplementing with high doses of selenium nearly doubled the risk of high-grade prostate cancer in some men. High doses of vitamin E more than doubled the risk of high-grade prostate cancer among other men in the study.

"High dose micronutrients were believed to reduce cancer risk, and our trial was started to prove that," said study author Alan Kristal, a professor of epidemiology at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. "These micronutrients turn out to be toxic.

"What I would like people to understand is that we now know of no added benefits of taking these supplements in high amounts," Kristal added.
Dr. Durado Brooks, director of prostate and colorectal cancers at the American Cancer Society, said the new findings lend further weight to existing concerns about high-dose supplements.

"These findings confirm the impact of vitamin E and the increased number of men developing prostate cancer," said Brooks, who was not involved with the study. "This study further supports the notion that selenium and vitamin E are not protective against prostate cancer - but harmful."
Brooks added that the doses of selenium and vitamin E used in this study far exceed the dose found in most multivitamins - a fact that may offer comfort to men taking a daily pill that happens to contain selenium and vitamin E.

Prostate cancer is the second most-common cancer in men worldwide, and more than 2.6 million American men live with the disease, according to National Cancer Institute estimates. The NCI also predicts that there will be an estimated 233,000 new cases of prostate cancer diagnosed this year, as well as nearly 30,000 deaths.

Doctor's Take
Nearly half of U.S. adults take vitamins and other dietary supplements - a level that's been holding steady for much of the past decade. During the past few years, study after study has raised doubts about what, if any, good vitamins actually do. And given more recent evidence - including this study - it's becoming clear that they could even pose some real risks.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) concluded in 2003 that there is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the use of supplements in the prevention of cancer. Meanwhile, the researchers behind this new study, based on their findings, suggest that men over age 55 should avoid vitamin E, selenium or the antioxidant combinations of the two that exceed recommended dietary intake of 55 micrograms for selenium and 15 milligrams for vitamin E.

Ultimately, consumers will decide for themselves. The important thing to remember is that nutritional supplements - useful or not - are no substitute for regular medical care, a good diet and other important health habits.
 

MylesBAstor

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2010
11,238
81
1,725
New York City
By Danielle Krol, M.D. ABC News

A new study might have men thinking twice about taking supplements.
The study, published today in the Journal of National Cancer Institute, links the micronutrients selenium and vitamin E to an increased risk of prostate cancer - a disease the supplements were once thought to prevent.

The finding is the latest to come out of the SELECT Trial, an ongoing study of more than 35,000 American men aged 55 and older. The trial started on the hunch that certain supplements might reduce the risk of prostate cancer. But initial results in 2008 suggested that selenium and vitamin E, taken alone or together, did not prevent prostate cancer. In fact vitamin E supplements appeared to raise the risk of the disease by 17 percent.
At the time, participants were instructed to stop taking these supplements but to keep checking in with the researchers. Now, more than five years later, it appears supplementing with high doses of selenium nearly doubled the risk of high-grade prostate cancer in some men. High doses of vitamin E more than doubled the risk of high-grade prostate cancer among other men in the study.

"High dose micronutrients were believed to reduce cancer risk, and our trial was started to prove that," said study author Alan Kristal, a professor of epidemiology at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. "These micronutrients turn out to be toxic.

"What I would like people to understand is that we now know of no added benefits of taking these supplements in high amounts," Kristal added.
Dr. Durado Brooks, director of prostate and colorectal cancers at the American Cancer Society, said the new findings lend further weight to existing concerns about high-dose supplements.

"These findings confirm the impact of vitamin E and the increased number of men developing prostate cancer," said Brooks, who was not involved with the study. "This study further supports the notion that selenium and vitamin E are not protective against prostate cancer - but harmful."
Brooks added that the doses of selenium and vitamin E used in this study far exceed the dose found in most multivitamins - a fact that may offer comfort to men taking a daily pill that happens to contain selenium and vitamin E.

Prostate cancer is the second most-common cancer in men worldwide, and more than 2.6 million American men live with the disease, according to National Cancer Institute estimates. The NCI also predicts that there will be an estimated 233,000 new cases of prostate cancer diagnosed this year, as well as nearly 30,000 deaths.

Doctor's Take
Nearly half of U.S. adults take vitamins and other dietary supplements - a level that's been holding steady for much of the past decade. During the past few years, study after study has raised doubts about what, if any, good vitamins actually do. And given more recent evidence - including this study - it's becoming clear that they could even pose some real risks.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) concluded in 2003 that there is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the use of supplements in the prevention of cancer. Meanwhile, the researchers behind this new study, based on their findings, suggest that men over age 55 should avoid vitamin E, selenium or the antioxidant combinations of the two that exceed recommended dietary intake of 55 micrograms for selenium and 15 milligrams for vitamin E.

Ultimately, consumers will decide for themselves. The important thing to remember is that nutritional supplements - useful or not - are no substitute for regular medical care, a good diet and other important health habits.

It's an awful study and one wonders how it got published.

You can bet if the supplements were made by big pharma, they would have received an unabashed endorsement. How many people have died from supplements vs big pharma drugs?
 

MylesBAstor

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2010
11,238
81
1,725
New York City
1. FDA has already verified that Se prevents several cancers and at that prostate by 85%.

2. Wrong version of Vit. E. They used synthetic alpha-tocopherol that in studies was shown to not only to have no effect, but actually may promote cancer. Other studies have shown that need a mix of alpha and gamma tocopherols and the lack of cancer protection by alpha tocopherol. Other studies have shown protection of the vascular endothelium by the gamma form that is part of the process of CHD. You know the isomeric form is critical in all drug and nutrient function. Just ask people who took cis vs trans platinum :)

3. Same goes for Se. Two forms, one protects, the other doesn't. Guess which form they chose?

4. Isn't it interesting they didn't suggest a mechanism by which these nutrients are acting to cause cancer?

5. Don't you find it interesting that the researcher saying that men should immediately stop??? Not to mention, there's quite a few published papers contradicting their findings. Ooops...

So the layman is going to read this and think what?
 

Phelonious Ponk

New Member
Jun 30, 2010
8,677
23
0
It's unfortunate that American medicine has allowed big pharma, as Myles put it, and corporate medicine, to turn health care into disease treatment. In doing so they've left a gap that has been filled by as many con artists as the well-meaning. And even the well-meaning seldom have the funding or the discipline to have any firm science behind their beliefs. Meanwhile, I'm sure huge sums of research money are being poured into erectile dysfunction and a cure for male pattern baldness.

Tim
 

MylesBAstor

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2010
11,238
81
1,725
New York City
It's unfortunate that American medicine has allowed big pharma, as Myles put it, and corporate medicine, to turn health care into disease treatment. In doing so they've left a gap that has been filled by as many con artists as the well-meaning. And even the well-meaning seldom have the funding or the discipline to have any firm science behind their beliefs. Meanwhile, I'm sure huge sums of research money are being poured into erectile dysfunction and a cure for male pattern baldness.

Tim

Don't forget the person who puts exercise in a pill gets a billion, trillion, zillion dollars. :)
 

BlueFox

Member Sponsor
Nov 8, 2013
1,709
407
405
It would be nice to know what the threshold dosage level is they are using as the trigger point.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing