---"..., a recording of the playback should be able to fool you ...."
Right there, the closer to that goal the better off we are. :b
Right there, the closer to that goal the better off we are. :b
For me it started very close to the beginning of digital, 1986. A little story with that: I actually purchased the previous generation TOL Yamaha player, the CD2000 I think it was, and it was performing quite nicely to my ears at the time. But, companies were having "issues" with getting the laser reading mechanisms to behave themselves then, and this Yamaha suffered this hiccup. So, back to the dealer it went, but the new model was out, and he graciously just did a straight swap with one of those, which is the one I have to this day and where my real audio journey began. A fortuitous event, because the later one was considerably better constructed, and had just the right characteristics as a platform to give me the "big" sound when all cylinders were firing. Someone just mentioned bad Led Zep CDs, but it was the first album that floored me way back then with the massive, overwhelming soundstage that was produced on this player -- there was no turning back now ...From http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showt...-what-says-you&p=115568&viewfull=1#post115568 ...
If i read Northstar right, he is saying that for HIM digital started to sound DECENT not PERFECT has you say in 1992, not that it hit the market in 1992, please read post #154 again i think it's pretty obvious what he ment.
Not really, Bob, that's the point! What I enjoy with music is the intensity, the texture of the sound washing over me, that's what I'm looking for. Normal hifi reproduction is just a caricature: it gets some things right, other aspects are totally wrong. And the main thing that is typically wrong is that the sound is tied to the speakers, it never gets much bigger than they are. Those Steinways speakers I heard a few days ago were monsters, and expensive, but the sound was absurdly lopsided, had nothing to do with what live music sounds like.---But then, when you go to a good Classical concert hall,
and that a good performing band (opera) is taking place; your home seems like peanuts! :b
Bob, you expressed it beautifully, that's what I'm after: and I do get it when the system's firing -- and all that's missing are the visuals. The massaging, enveloping, caressing do happen, but, and, again, the big but, this can only happen when the level of audible distortion drops below a certain level. People are so used to the standard of normal low level hifi distortion that they somehow feel that you can never get rid of it; but you can, you have to firstly believe it's possible, and secondly, persevere with the fine tuning, tweaking, etc, until it's eradicated. Unfortunately, it's a bit of an all or nothing thing: to use a car analogy, drive the Ferrari at 150mph, firstly with a single wheel out of balance, secondly wiith that defect corrected by adding a miserable little piece of metal to the wheel rim. One experience will be a nightmare, the other will be magic.Frank, in a good concert hall the music is massaging you all over the body (from the tip of your toes to the tip of the hairs on your head; if you have some), plus enveloping and caressing you all over your senses and organs. ...And with real LIVE power, plus the visual/emotional vibes from the stage performers.
At home, you don't have that full enchilada (better have a hi res Audio/Video Blu-ray with a HD front projector for the very Best simili experience).
You follow, you dig? :b
I realised 25 years ago that the typical, separate preamp only adds weaknesses to the system. The 2 extra sets of RCA connectors alone will do enough damage to cancel any gains: yes, it may sound better in some ways, but one is further away from getting truly undistorted sound. Of course, if you have multiple sources then there is a problem, but the way I would "solve" that is to create, or use, a very high quality "integrated amplifier".From http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showt...-source-system&p=115782&viewfull=1#post115782 ...
Do any audiophiles besides digit lovers who are wedded to a single digital source not use preamps in their systems? A preamp is the heart of any stereo system that employs mulitple sources.
I will take it seriously, Tom, sorry about that, because commenting on it bears repeating over and over again. That disappearance into a black hole of digital high frequencies is a form of distortion, everyone knows vinyl distortion characteristics through decades of hearing such, but the digital variation is more subtle, less obviously something you can point the finger at. The first time I heard this happening on another system I nearly fell off my chair -- where the hell's the sound gone, I thought!From http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showthread.php?6893-The-Analog-DAC&p=115803&viewfull=1#post115803 ...
I still have a sneaky suspicion about the higher frequencies in redbook as far as the higher and thus smaller harmonics as disappearing too fast into the silence but thats jjust me.. Don't take that post too seriously mates.
It can't help but degrade, unless it manages to compensate in key areas for deficiencies elsewhere. Rather than a car analogy, I'll use a trucking one, might appeal to people more! Load up a flatbed truck with goods to be transported in a sloppy, poor integrity way, and the driving to the destination will typically be a quite a disturbing one, every bump on the road and going around a corner will be an adventure, in a negative sense! Add another parcel of goods, and it just might do the trick, it manages to jam the badly organised other parcels together in such a way that they don't move around quite as much, so it is a "solution" of sorts ...From http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showt...-source-system&p=116024&viewfull=1#post116024 ...
I think SQ is what we are talking about. If I put together a larger single source system (that's a given for me), how do I choose a source, with gain and volume control, that is a good match for my amps, or is there something else to it, some other factors? If not; if impedance matching and enough voltage to drive the amp is it (other than the quality of the components - noise, distortion, etc.), then how can an additional boxful of components in the signal chain (called a preamp), regardless of the quality of those components, do anything but degrade SQ?
My suspicion on what was happening, is that interference was being transferred from the CD player to the power amp. Or vice versa. Through the connectors between the two: yes, this shouldn't happen, especially for expensive gear, but the cost of a component gives very little guide as to how impervious equipment is to these sort of interactions. There are lots, and lots of "shouldn'ts" in audio ...From http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showt...-source-system&p=116034&viewfull=1#post116034 ...
... but in all my testing, paradoxically, a good preamp always added transparency.
When I was setting up the demo with the "Dragons" I initially set up the fabulous Burmester 089 CD player with volume control directly driving the power amps (mine - with 75k ohm input impedance - but with 7m XLR balanced cables) and the sound, while good, was not great. When I added the 077 preamp, transparency went up a notch, and macro- and micro- dynamics was better.
You'd better not let Tim see this ... never hear the last of it ... :bFrom http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showt...-Something-But&p=116046&viewfull=1#post116046 ...
The performances, conducted under a large tent in a space that seats approximately 500 people, had sound support in the form of multiple, relatively small, professional-grade active speakers, no bigger than a conventional 'bookshelf' type, mounted high on the lighting scaffolding ...
...
The sound was just incredible for what it was- the piano sounded like real pianos do- warm, deep, slightly percussive and wide ranging, the massed vocals were clear and open. This, from something off what appeared to be a sound reinforcement board of the type you'd see in professional auditoria. Not an SET amp or fancy cable in sight! I was trying to figure out why it sounded so good, for 'non-high end' stuff
Note the "killer" element of the darTZeel, an "optical" volume control mechanism, no nasty potentiometer, or mechanical switches in that key area. I suspect if Mike tried any preamp now, no matter how expensive, that used conventional volume control mechansims, that he would find the drop in quality because of this factor unacceptable ...From http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showt...-source-system&p=116135&viewfull=1#post116135 ...
over those 5 years i tried many high performance expensive preamps until i tried the darTZeel NHB-18NS preamp which clearly surpassed the Placette passive.
Actually, it's the other way round ...!! Most amplifiers sound less powerful than they should, considering the rated power of the units. Tim is one of the, seemingly rare, audio engineers who does "get" what's important for making an amplifier work properly: a true, I repeat true, 20 watt amp, driving conventionally sensitive speakers should be able to create a very impressive, highly convincing sound picture. If that doesn't happen then there is something "wrong" -- it's as simple as that ...From http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showt...d-to-post-this&p=116247&viewfull=1#post116247 ...
I never understood why, but all the Tim de Paravicini amplifiers I remember seemed to sound more powerful than they should, considering the rated power and weight!
Very easily: consider if the input has very high frequency, inaudible noise riding on top of it, and the inbetween component does an excellent job of pretending to be a piece of wire, apart from the circuit through the choice of parts acting as an excellent filter, discarding that unwanted and nominally inaudible extra signal element. The following power amp, say, doesn't like ultrasonic nonsense, which upsets its working, so now the end result is markedly superior reproduced sound. Better sound from greater complexity -- sometimes the fates are on your side ...From http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showt...-source-system&p=116221&viewfull=1#post116221 ...
Can the signal from the source have less distortion, less noise, less coloration after it passes through a component (regardless of its quality), than it did before it passed through the component?
Everything like this is very easy to understand, so long as one drops the fantasy of audio components being "scientific" black boxes: the layman's version of this concept is that something exists in space totally independent of everything that's around it; no matter what happens in its vicinity, the behaviour of the item remains sacrosanct, untouched by the external goings on. To take an "extreme" example, someone plugs in a heavy duty arc welder into the socket next to the A/D unit's plug and starts fooling around on the other side of a soundproof wall: the measurement people might, foolishly, assert that this will make absolutely no difference to the audible results .From http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showt...-source-system&p=116619&viewfull=1#post116619 ...
On a whim, we suggested using one of the audiophile power cords we had. The shock on his face was palpable. You could see it in his eyes that he thought his recordings would be improved if he had that power cord. His comment was that it seemed that the musicians had more energy. He said that it was the biggest improvement any cable had ever given him.
We took the cable off and went back to the cable he started with, and it went back to as before. Putting the cable back in, we got the same improvement. Needless to say, he left for home with the power cable in his bag.
Why did that happen? A power cable?? I don't know either. But it made a difference - and this was to the recording engineer who was there during the musical performance.