Yep, i hear ya, and i understand why a lot of players like small amps overloading into a mic'd PA or studio mike.I don't know the Mercury, but if it does what hifi would do, which is limit the generation of harmonic distortion relative to input volume, it would limit the dynamic interaction and "feel" of the amplifier. Not a good thing in a guitar amp. There are times when - you know this if you're a guitarist - when we may want a bit more headroom. I've spent most of my life playing Deluxe Reverbs, and in some rooms they don't stay "clean" (a relative term in this context if their ever was one) quite loud enough. I've used tube choices, speakers and extension cabinets to adjust that a bit. I suppose you could get affect that with a transformer as well, but damn...that would be the hard way. But an amp that doesn't "give" when you play hard or turn up the guitar's volume - an amp that is "hifi" is not desireable in the electric guitar world. If it was, solid state would rule. So I can't imagine that the goals of a replacement transformer in a Vibrolux have anything to do with what you want transformers to do in a hifi amp.
Most electric guitar players think the ultimate is an old amp that's on the verge of death, not one with a high-end transformer replacement .
Personally, I've moved on. I've still got an old Deluxe, but I don't gig with it anymore. I use a digital modeling amp. The thing "gives" just like a tube amp and has a ton of models in it. Does it do BF Deluxe exactly like my BF Deluxe? It's really close. And it weighs maybe 30 lbs and gives me a BF Deluxe, BF Twin and Vox AC-30 TB right there, in the foot pedal.
Tim
Didn't mean to derail the thread to talk about guitar amps, just thought it might be an easy example of aftermarket transformers, since it was the first one that came to mind, albeit not in the hi-fi realm. At some point when i get time, i'll look at what Mercury claims to be the sonic advantage of using their transformers. Back to our program?
Thanks Tim.