Save it...Zzzzzzzzzzz
Save it...Zzzzzzzzzzz
But Andre surely you have to admit that the ACA has impacted both patients who want to keep their plans and doctors as well as doctors who are now being impacted financially because their patients are being forced to seek other medical care.
I remember vividly when Obama said what he did so how can it be Zzzzzzzzzz at your end
Of course there are issues...I don't see what relation to my post about Chase and it's financial crimes.
In my view bankers are not worse then politicians ,at least they dont hide their greed .
do you really think politicians have " clean hands " in this whole matter andre ??
off topic...
Well you asked why none has gone to jail . there is my answer
fair enough. another answer is that in the world of the ultra rich and powerful personal responsibility is non existent.
reminds me of a new term i learned today "affluenza"
its an actual defense used in crime cases: http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/12/12...not-liable-for-deadly-drunk-driving-accident/
"Couch suffers from “affluenza,” according to his lawyers, a term which means that his wealthy parents pretty much let him get away with everything.
The defense saved him from a 20-year sentence; State District Judge Jean Boyd bought it at his sentencing on Tuesday and gave Couch probation instead."
God bless America. And it's lawyers.
The DRUNK kid Killed 4 pedestrians.
The judge must be rubbing a lot of "affluenza" between his greedy fingers. Meaning the judge who basically gave the drunk kid a total Pass on the crime.
zz.
Yes, and if he was from the other side of the tracks he would be in the slammer. At least he went before a judge.
Those who perpetrated the financial crimes of 2007 have yet to even stand before a judge, aside from "Fab" Fabio
of Goldman Sachs.
Yes, they usually throw someone in the gladiator ring for the public - e.g. Martha Stewart.
zz.
Their only responsibility is to ensure that welfare for the rich, both financially and legally, remains in play.fair enough. another answer is that in the world of the ultra rich and powerful personal responsibility is non existent.
The poor don't have any investments, savings or retirements, and their homes have no equity. You could (convincingly) argue the middle class got shafted in the sub-prime crisis through the bailouts, but not "the poor".