I thought she was MY wife???!!!My wife is the most beautiful woman, the best in the world.![]()
I thought she was MY wife???!!!My wife is the most beautiful woman, the best in the world.![]()
. but i respect it's not a preference for some, particularly where vinyl or tubes are the main choices. people who own and like their dCS should be happy i think.
Mike thanks for your statement here. The statement and your examples helped me reconsider how I state things concerning high-end audio. At this level, I’m thinking it’s more individual preference as opposed to better, best and bad, etc. Thanks.different people hear things differently.
i think i would need to either A/B the new dCS Apex with another dac in a mature system, or have it in my own system, to actually go so far as to see it negatively. unlikely it would be my favorite, but i still respect it as higher level digital. degrees of good i guess is i'm saying. not bad.
PK has it in his system and it's been the 'control reference' for 4 or 5 dac alternatives, i've spoken to him, and he was positive about it.
i heard it in a few systems at Axpona and it sounded promising. but my perspective could be described as incomplete.
just don't care to read all the negative where i don't see it, or hear it. but i respect it's not a preference for some, particularly where vinyl or tubes are the main choices. people who own and like their dCS should be happy i think.
I heard the Apex in munich plus lots of other DCS set ups at dealers and private set ups over a 15- 20 years timespan.
Of course one can say a show means nothing , its all fine with me
I have never understood why people spoke so highly of all those multi stack high $$$ digital sources .
Mediocre differences if any at all.
My biggest financial mistakes/ disappointments in high end audio have been with digital .
Meaning buying according to reviewers/ mags opinions.
Wadax is a different beast though.
Clarity / solidity a tapelike natural flow .
Afaik you cant even compare the others .
Its like comparing a bentley to a volkswagen golf.
Thanks andromedaaudio. I dont consider it a fight for the win whatsoever. I consider it a listening and demonstration and experience gathering mission. Not only do people hear differently, rooms are different and so are associated rigs. For instance if DAC A is soft sounding, the rig will be tuned to bring detail for balance. If DAC B is transparent and put in the same rig, DAC B will sound forward when its not truly a forward sounding DAC. These are givens and everyone knows this (I hope) .... so its not a fight for the win.. Not sure why everyone wants to put things that way..Its a noble act , but i think after 10 years discussion ( and apart from a special Golden ears group ) on WBF we have respectfully concluded everybody hears differently .
So you may win that particular " shoot out " , but in no means win the battle / declare victory
I wish people can do that in the real world and my house can be tuned to become big like Elon Musk's house.Thanks andromedaaudio. I dont consider it a fight for the win whatsoever. I consider it a listening and demonstration and experience gathering mission. Not only do people hear differently, rooms are different and so are associated rigs. For instance if DAC A is soft sounding, the rig will be tuned to bring detail for balance. If DAC B is transparent and put in the same rig, DAC B will sound forward when its not truly a forward sounding DAC. These are givens and everyone knows this (I hope) .... so its not a fight for the win.. Not sure why everyone wants to put things that way..
become big like .....
Mike thanks for your statement here. The statement and your examples helped me reconsider how I state things concerning high-end audio. At this level, I’m thinking it’s more individual preference as opposed to better, best and bad, etc. Thanks.
Audire, this is What’s Best Forum. People are very comfortable declaring what they think is best. Often, but not always, there are reasons for the claims.
in time, after things settle, the market can often determine what survives and later becomes coveted.
i think i would need to either A/B the new dCS Apex (...)
That is (only) one way to look at it. The other way is that DCS is a very well known (solid state digital) brand that has been producing dacs, (sacd)transports and clocks for many years, including very expensive ones such as their current top of the line Vivaldi stack. It is only quite logical that expensive (solid state digital) gear is compared to each other and as a consequence the Wadax reference components are compared to for example the DCS Vivaldi and the MSB select. In other words, it is saying very little to nothing about the quality as such of the various (digital solid state) components that are being compared to each other.The fact that almost any thread on other brands of expensive DACs turns in a dCS Vivaldi thread is the real proof its significance and sound quality. Raveen Bawa, dCS sales director visited our distributor this week - it seems sales are booming after the Apex, although the global chip shortage is slowing deliveries and upgrades.
I see what you did here.Accurate description. To summarize, unnatural sound.
And Mola MolaI much rather put the CH precision DAC in the mix as solid state competition
100% agree. No resemblance of actual music - just artificial noise.
I like your new avatar. England is green! It would also be cool to see the wood of your speakers in color.
Is that small box in the middle a F-C power supply?
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |