I miss my MC601's paired with a Conrad Johnson ET5 (at the time). I just did not appreciate what I had. Very musical and easy to listen to for hours on end.
I miss my MC601's paired with a Conrad Johnson ET5 (at the time). I just did not appreciate what I had. Very musical and easy to listen to for hours on end.
when conrad johnson tried to make a SS amp the first time, they failed. anyone remember the motif? the preamps were noisy and even had an underlying 'tube rush' or hiss and the amps possessed the worst kind of 'mosfet mist' like a veil over the music, the antithesis of transparent.
with modern gear, me thinks electrocompaniet, rowland, ayre and gamut would make the tube-like list. some class d amps ive heard come close.
when conrad johnson tried to make a SS amp the first time, they failed. anyone remember the motif? the preamps were noisy and even had an underlying 'tube rush' or hiss and the amps possessed the worst kind of 'mosfet mist' like a veil over the music, the antithesis of transparent.
with modern gear, me thinks electrocompaniet, rowland, ayre and gamut would make the tube-like list. some class d amps ive heard come close.
I have the Naksa 70 & can fully agree with this statement from the site "The NAKSA 70 creates a presentation comparable to a quality tube amplifier, whilst delivering stunning resolution and a pure, sweet, musical sound."
technical brian showed at the newport show last month. i never heard of them before and it was a good sounding room, at the time i thought the TAD CR-1s had much to do with it.
technical brian showed at the newport show last month. i never heard of them before and it was a good sounding room, at the time i thought the TAD CR-1s had much to do with it.
technical brian showed at the newport show last month. i never heard of them before and it was a good sounding room, at the time i thought the TAD CR-1s had much to do with it.
For those of you curious about my experiences with Pass, the amps we something XAand cost $16K or so. They drove the newer $50K Focals ( I get confused about their model names, as they all sound similar to me). The front end was the top of the line one-box esoteric. Overall, the system sounded hi-fi to me - meaning it was executing on the audiophile vocabulary but lacking to put me in a state of flow and connection to the music.
But we all have different tastes, and thus many brands to choose from. I am happy for those of you who are enjoying your amps.
I am not a fan of Magico, but the best I have heard Magico sound was with Balabo (and VTL), as it put some meat on the anorexic bones.
As for Soulution, in the latest Stereophile, Fremer said that Soulution sounded too thin and too speedy - compared to the big Dartzeel amps he just reviewed.
Personally, I think the ancillary equipment, including the source, cabling, and room acoustics have so much to do with how a certain amp "sounds". In other words, you could listen to an amp in one room and it will sound "mid-fi" and in another room it may sound warm, inviting, and connect you to the music. I wish you luck in your search.
I hate the fact that the words “Hi Fi” have taken on a pejorative meaning. Those words should be a compliment because if something is truly high-fidelity, it should be accurate to the source.
Don made an interesting comment about dropping the damping factor. I noticed that tubes have a rep for being sluggish but I have found that it is load dependent. A decently done 8 or even 3 watt tube amp into 105dB fairly flat impedance loudspeakers will disabuse any believer in this characterization of tube amps in general. Being "stressed" also affects the harmonic distortion levels as Don pointed out.
So to me, when I think of tube like timbre and tone, I am not thinking of the improperly loaded characteristics of tube amps but rather their low level resolving capabilities particularly the type of zero crossover distortion artifacts (the edginess found in less than stellar SS implementation or PP tubes for that matter). I find tubes more benign in this regard. The commonality for me then of the SS amps I tried with the tube amps I like isn't a warm and fuzzy nature. What they seem to also have in common are very fast switching transistors (look at the bandwidth figures). While these alone are no guarantee of good articulation and by that I mean articulation that sounds natural, I'm just stating an observation.
That said, yes tube amps can be PITAs and like I said, that's why I switched.