Good idea. I think a request to the mods might be in order for them to move the entire thread complete with comments. They can do that.
But that's the point, The cables are supposed to do "nothing."
Since the article is about multiple products and not just cables.... I don't think you can have a conversation just limited to cables in this regard.
I totally believe in conditioned power and happy to see the result (if it's independently verifiable) and scary that makers of of multi-million dollar diagnostics with expensive service contracts left that kind of noise floor performance on the cutting room floor given the pricing disparity.
Or that lower noise floor may not matter diagnostically?
The power conditioners and/or filters are obviously doing something to lower the noisefloor, but there's nothing in the linked article that proves that the cables are doing anything beyond connecting the various components together. So I have no idea why the OP would title this thread "Power Cables".
I agree that something that could have life saving implications needs to be rigorously tested. Right or wrong I assume that is either being done or has already been done. Perhaps thier engineers don't believe in cables either.:b
I am always delighted when evidence emerges that an audiophile device is not "snake oil."
You will have to define which of the multiple power delivery/conditionin devices you are talking about.
Would the power conditioners with properly rated IEC power cables give the same performance?
In Cleveland I did work for a contractor for NASA. They had Zeisse (?) micrometer measuring systems that were floating on 1800 lb blocks of granite (literally floated on air). I installed 12Kva of battery bank, pure sine-wave APC power in case the electricity went out so the granite didn't come crashing down. Took up half the wall.
Used 10AWG DC (battery cables). So I totally get and respect conditioned power.
Interesting story. I like them as such.
Properly rated IEC cables? What do you mean? Standard IEC cables are trash by engineering standards.
I think you missed the part were I was asking it as a question.
You'll get a better measurement with the Shunyata power cord. But the difference will be less audibly by having a power conditioner, than if you were just comparing the two cords.
As examples, not actual figures... (may be close to real figures)
IEC standard we'll give it a value of -5db
Shunyata we'll give it a value of -15db
Shunyata power conditioner we'll give it a value of -40db
The math you already did in your head. As you can see the big factor is the power conditioner. But you may be been able to hear swapping cables somewhat easily without it. The effect is cumulative in measurement, but becomes a little harder to detect the lower the noise floor goes.
No, we do know. There's nothing in either powercord that's able to cause interaction problems with the power conditioner. There is no question here aside from actual figure on attenuation, which vary by frequency. Your question is answered. There is no mystery here. If you have questions as to why you can't come to the same conclusions, just ask.
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |