Videos of Acoustically-Coupled Audio Recordings

If we are going to powder-puff our commentary then what’s the point. I rather hear the truth than pretend that everything is okay. I know that there is no one else like me here and I’m okay with that, actually I’m glad and proud of it. Music and the sound of your stereo are a very personal thing and if you are happy so be it. Why be something that you’re not? You shouldn’t strive too hard to please others. Demonstrate confidence and conviction because in the world only the strong survive and thrive.

Case in point, Brad told me my violin reproduction lacked wood, and you know what? Brad was right! A button push and two know turned and guess what Brad and everyone else had their wood. I personally didn’t miss the wood and I remain fine listening without it, but if it wasn’t for the exposure and the commentary I might not have experimented with adding wood emphasis to the sound. That’s kind of the whole point of the forum, it’s to learn from others……and to teach those who need it and are willing to listen.
Sure, carry on, just don't expect any other members to post.
 
Sure, carry on, just don't expect any other members to post.

Speaking of learning from others and experimenting, when I developed the Remastering Process’ “Wood Edition” settings for the Perlman violin track, I also used the same settings to re-record the Shostakovich movement. Perhaps to audiophiles everything sounds better with that wood frequency emphasis. Will re-record Karma Police with the “Wood Edition” settings and hear how that sounds. I did listen to some of my music with the “Wood Edition” settings and it was too much for me as the sound on my music became more congested and it lost some of the ethereal feel.I will experiment with developing a setting that provides the wood for jazz, classical and pop recordings while maintaining the airy dimensionality and instrument separation that I currently enjoy. Will play around during my listening session and see what I come up with. The beauty of the mastering equipment that I use it that everything is stepped and recallable. It is fun to play around and experiment but lately with the Remastering process and my developed playlists in Roon it is just nice to hit shuffle on a playlist and let the server surprise you with an unexpected track instead of actively playing DJ.
 
Last edited:
Are you serious?
This, for example, sounds better than any youtube version AND any Qobuz version:

Are you serious?

This video of the music direct sounds so much better than that vinyl video:


It certainly does in the sense that instruments are much fuller, have more body and substance, as well as presence. The vinyl video sounds thin. Just compare the solo sax and, around 4 minutes, the trumpet solos. It's not even close.

Sure, there is more "ambience" on the vinyl, but that's because the ambience of the recording is not just recorded as such, but also as contribution from the reproduction in the room where the system plays (and the room ambience itself may also contribute excessively, if it is a too lively room).

So in which way do you think that the vinyl (digitized) video is better than any digital version?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hopkins
I will re-recorded with the “Wood Edition” settings when I get a chance. I’m starting to get the picture that many of you like the sound that sounds like an old man’s system with a prominent midrange and dry presentation. I have never liked that old fashion sound that many obviously do. I listen to Deep House music, Hardcore Punk, Speedcore, Industrial Music, Big Beat and Break Beat techno music, ThrashCore, New Wave, Drum n Bass, Dub, Lo-Fi, Grindcore, Dubstep, Leftfield, Hard House, Trip Hop, Jungle, Hardstyle, Darkwave, Grunge, Gabber, Speed Metal, Freestyle, Lounge, Crust, Goa-Trance, Deep Techno, Power Violence, Dark Electro, Crossover Thrash and other musical genres and styles. I don’t sit around and listen to Ella Fitzgerald and Louis Armstrong, 50’s jazz and classical music all day. My system must perform well under extreme conditions, and not only in the comfort of the slow acoustic sounds for the geriatric unit.
FYI, there’s a deep catalog of adventurous classical and jazz music.
 
[
An interesting discussion over on Audiogon about this video and system, and also about system videos in general. I guess it is not just here.


If this is what you are referring to, what is so interesting in the discussion?

 
How far is your phone/microphone from the speakers ? It seems quite far - have you tried moving it closer?

I like it when people place the mic right where they are sitting to get the perspective from the listening seat. Sure one can move it around and perhaps improve the sound. In that case, perhaps experimenting with seat location might be worth trying too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tima
[

If this is what you are referring to, what is so interesting in the discussion?


Here is a link to the thread: https://forum.audiogon.com/discussi...mail&utm_campaign=website&utm_source=sendgrid

I find it interesting that they are having the same discussion there as we have here. Some find the system videos useful while others do not. And those who enjoy them simply tell those who do not to ignore them. But they cannot ignore them. And they cannot ignore the discussion.

I also thought the early comment about getting "heat" was pretty funny, as well as the prioritizing of grounding and the power delivery to the quality of the sound of the system.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hopkins
Pay very close attention at the playback of the two videos. Your video sounds like you are listening to the recording being played back over the radio, while my video sounds like you are listening to them performing the song live. My video sounds more “real” and the precision, resolution, inner detail, and the separation of the individual instruments and vocals is undeniable on my video while your video sounds like you are listening to a recording. Which video do you find more exciting & enjoyable to listen to? For me, that’s obvious.
To me the YT is the best of the 3. The WAAR remaster's booming bass is overwhelming.
 
Last edited:
Here is a link to the thread: https://forum.audiogon.com/discussi...mail&utm_campaign=website&utm_source=sendgrid

I find it interesting that they are having the same discussion there as we have here. Some find the system videos useful while others do not. And those who enjoy them simply tell those who do not to ignore them. But they cannot ignore them. And they cannot ignore the discussion.

I also thought the early comment about getting "heat" was pretty funny, as well as the prioritizing of grounding and the power delivery to the quality of the sound of the system.

Do they have good videos on the Gon
 
Are you serious?

This video of the music direct sounds so much better than that vinyl video:


It certainly does in the sense that instruments are much fuller, have more body and substance, as well as presence. The vinyl video sounds thin. Just compare the solo sax and, around 4 minutes, the trumpet solos. It's not even close.

Sure, there is more "ambience" on the vinyl, but that's because the ambience of the recording is not just recorded as such, but also as contribution from the reproduction in the room where the system plays (and the room ambience itself may also contribute excessively, if it is a too lively room).

So in which way do you think that the vinyl (digitized) video is better than any digital version?
I have to disagree. I think the Rexp 45 vinyl is much, much better than the YT version. Also much better than the mono version on the Cessaro system. Full of life. The others sound muddled by comparison. I don't hear a negative room influence here (and unwanted room reverberation is my biggest issue with many system vids).
 
I have to disagree. I think the Rexp 45 vinyl is much, much better than the YT version. Also much better than the mono version on the Cessaro system. Full of life. The others sound muddled by comparison. I don't hear a negative room influence here (and unwanted room reverberation is my biggest issue with many system vids).

not at all. The Rex version is so etched and artificial. It is a badly set up YG
 
In your opinion, to your ears.
One person’s “etched” can be another’s clarity. My headphones are a bit on the warm side. Perhaps through earbuds it might tip toward the etched side.
 
In your opinion, to your ears.
One person’s “etched” can be another’s clarity. My headphones are a bit on the warm side. Perhaps through earbuds it might tip toward the etched side.

I have to agree with Bonzo on this one, "etched and artificial". I also don't hear how it is more "full of life" than the version that I posted. Yes, "artificial life" maybe.

But if your headphones are a bit on the warm side, that might explain things to some extent. Then the YouTube direct recording might sound a bit dull, too.
 
Pay very close attention at the playback of the two videos. Your video sounds like you are listening to the recording being played back over the radio, while my video sounds like you are listening to them performing the song live. My video sounds more “real” and the precision, resolution, inner detail, and the separation of the individual instruments and vocals is undeniable on my video while your video sounds like you are listening to a recording.
1st, I highly admire your effort, skill, and achievement in a sound process. In your own way of analysis of audio sound, your video sounds more complete than almost any other systems.

2nd, don't take my words too hard in 3rd. People who comment on your works are very valuable your friends. I think people like you can make the perfect reproduction audio and change the audio/sound industry. I root (and will to support if I have ability) for you. So, let merry-go-round upgrade path audiophiles (and their wives) have and enjoy the perfect sound in this life time.

3rd, there are many to talk about hi-end audio and your sound but I'll try to make short.
----- a) You can improve more on delicate sounds. In below video, sounds of musical instrument are basic and given. We (hi-end audio people) pass those. I try to delineate the moisture (and soft flesh) of lips and the texture of skin condition of fingers (and pressure of) hitting drums of artists. *Something like feeling the moisture of tongue and softness of lips of a singer.

------ b) You can improve the texture (timber?) of sound. The same music notes can be played by tearing papers (or a Stradivarius), hitting rocks (or great drums), me (or Pavarotti), etc. I don't like to listen below video. I won't talk about it's sound. You figure out.

------ c) You can improve the naturalness of sound. To find naturalness of your video, say repeat "hello" while your video is playing. If your voice and your video sound are blending well and hear your voice and music together normally, you have a great natural sound audio system. Say "hello" and listen with below videos playing. *The original music must match with your voice (means your ears are in natural mode).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Carlos269
Do they have good videos on the Gon

I do not know Kedar. This thread caught my eye because it is about a system video and the guy says his system sounds natural. There is a link to the video, and I think it sounds pretty good. I like his priority on proper grounding and power delivery too.
 
Last edited:

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing