gary!!!!!!!
It's always interesting to see who won, but I don't have it in me to follow the events leading up to the awards, nor can my interest span the time needed to watch any of the awards programs.
I'm happy to see the list of winners online or in the newspaper.
Who am I kidding, I don't get a newspaper anymore. I'll see the winners online.
TVH I would prefer to see Dunkirk win rather than Three Billboards
Steve, those are my two next movies - we are on MoviePass so thankfully it doesn't really cost us much to see movies anymore.
And you were right - why was an Aussie cast as the chief's wife? I think the director/writer doesn't have a clue about rural America and resorted to 20 year old Tarentino-type humor on race/sexual orientation/dwarfism/dimwits to keep a meandering script going. And the ending was like "say what?."
I agree McDormand and Rockwell were very good and probably deserve the hardware.
The end was perfect. This movie was like a great fable from an earlier time. The "oracle" of the story is Woody Harrelson's character. If you remember the phenomenal dialog that he and McDormand's character had on the swings, he stated that these types of cases were difficult to solve and it might take years.
This is a small town with small town thinking. Accept for the "oracle," an intelligent and sophisticated person that traveled to world and would of course have a wife from another country.
Extremely well thought out and imagined movie....no wonder he makes so few.
Jeff, no offense but I don't need the film explained to me as I find you are searching for depth that wasn't there. I simply found it the most overrated film of the year. Full of shock value with no real point. Yes, indeed it tried to be a Coen film in the first half hour then went off the rails. Faux brilliance.
and if you believe this is a microcosm of rural america's thinking and intelligence, I suggest you explore more. ironically the writer/director is Irish, didn't shoot the film in Missouri, and Ebbing of course isn't a real town.
Sorry I offended you. The brilliance and the depth are there, but don't take my word for it. A 88 Metacritic rating and a lovely review Kenneth Turan from the LA Times:
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-three-billboards-review-20171109-story.html
Jeff, no offense but I don't need the film explained to me as I find you are searching for depth that wasn't there. I simply found it the most overrated film of the year. Full of shock value with no real point. Yes, indeed it tried to be a Coen film in the first half hour then went off the rails. Faux brilliance.
and if you believe this is a microcosm of rural america's thinking and intelligence, I suggest you explore more. ironically the writer/director is Irish, didn't shoot the film in Missouri, and Ebbing of course isn't a real town.
Yeah Paddington 2 was better than even the first one, I think.
Dunkirk sucked.
From this list I will try to watch the international films.