Hi guys,
Over the last couple of days I've been listening to a new DAC I had custom built using the AKM AK4490eq DAC chip. It's a state of the art design using ultra low phase noise clocks (-114Dbc @ 10hz) and 100% discrete circuity. Not a single IC in the signal path besides the DAC chip, and the output stage runs in pure class A. So far the only interface I have connected to it is a very well implemented Xmos based USB interface. All I can say is this is one hell of a chip when supported by SOTA circuitry! It put's my Mirus to shame, even when it's playing tracks from the SD card transport. The sound is so pure it's astonishing. The PCM is the best I've heard, especially when upsampled to 24/384 with HQplayer. This chip also has a DSD direct bypass mode. This mode bypasses all the internal processing for the purest DSD possible from an IC chip. THE PCM is so good upsampled to 24/384 with HQ player that it's hard to beat. But upsampling to DSD 256 with HQplayer, allows complete bypassing of all the chips internal processing. Is it better? I think it would be a matter of personal taste and the computer used to do the processing. Way more CPU processing power is required to convert on the fly to DSD 256. Where as my broadwell I3 NUC can upsample to 24/384 with only 5% CPU load. So I suppose that is a major factor.
I can't wait to hear this DAC with a SOTA Ravenna interface!!!
Over the last couple of days I've been listening to a new DAC I had custom built using the AKM AK4490eq DAC chip. It's a state of the art design using ultra low phase noise clocks (-114Dbc @ 10hz) and 100% discrete circuity. Not a single IC in the signal path besides the DAC chip, and the output stage runs in pure class A. So far the only interface I have connected to it is a very well implemented Xmos based USB interface. All I can say is this is one hell of a chip when supported by SOTA circuitry! It put's my Mirus to shame, even when it's playing tracks from the SD card transport. The sound is so pure it's astonishing. The PCM is the best I've heard, especially when upsampled to 24/384 with HQplayer. This chip also has a DSD direct bypass mode. This mode bypasses all the internal processing for the purest DSD possible from an IC chip. THE PCM is so good upsampled to 24/384 with HQ player that it's hard to beat. But upsampling to DSD 256 with HQplayer, allows complete bypassing of all the chips internal processing. Is it better? I think it would be a matter of personal taste and the computer used to do the processing. Way more CPU processing power is required to convert on the fly to DSD 256. Where as my broadwell I3 NUC can upsample to 24/384 with only 5% CPU load. So I suppose that is a major factor.
I can't wait to hear this DAC with a SOTA Ravenna interface!!!
Last edited: