no, I would not describe it as such. I'd say it's quality build but also that the B & M focus is on the performance, and not on esoteric build. the Aqua are attractive and worthy of a spot on my rack. the outer casework is powder coated rolled aluminum, not milled and anodized. the face plate is milled aluminum. they are not heavyweights. I've seen better industrial design and build quality......with lower performance......at higher price points.
no rough edges or anything shabby for sure.
I found the stock soft rubber (sorbothane?) footers do cause smearing and it's an easy fix, but so do footers on 90% of all gear. the Herzan made a big difference as has been mentioned. the Transport works silky smooth.
I've seen inside, and that looks impressive to the degree I can tell. and everything is modular so it is upgradable......which for digital is more significant than milled casework. as is the 4 board discrete RTR dac boards at this price point. with digital a less robust case can actually be beneficial as it allows the bad vibes to escape easier. who knows about design choices that get made and the why?
it's not bling! bling!
my system has always been a mixture of over-the-top ultimate build quality gear such as the dart pre and 458 mono's, the Rockport Sirius III, Linn CD-12, or the Studer A-820's, but also I used the Placette RVC passive as my preamp for years, my King-Cello tape repro could not be more basic looking, and the original EMM Labs Dac 2, and transport looked like the cat dragged them in. I love pretty things, but mostly I like stuff that works great in my system.
no doubt I have 'gear crush' on a few different digital products based on how they look. would I pay another $5k or $10k for a sexier looking Aqua? I'm glad I didn't need to.