But can it get even better with a R2R?!!
With the right tapes, absolutely!
Analog people choosing not to get into tape are matters of policy and allocation of resources and cost/benefit analysis, not a matter of ultimate sound quality.
But can it get even better with a R2R?!!
Thanks Ron.
What about the life of a tape? In terms of how many times it can be played before the SQ is significantly different vs when new
Thanks Ron.
What about the life of a tape? In terms of how many times it can be played before the SQ is significantly different vs when new?
not heard of any.[edited]
Are there any Ballfingers in N. America?
I heard from Ballfinger. They will ship to Canada, so I assume they will ship to the USA. 16 week lead-time.not heard of any.
my SWAG is that maybe they did not spend the time/money to make the Ballfinger decks multi-voltage. maybe to do with the motor drive? they might see what scale they build to and whether that supports expanding the design to accommodate that. i'm no engineer so really cannot speculate what it takes for multi-voltage, but sufficient torque and flexibility of the drive system could be a factor. it's a bit more involved than spinning a platter.
what other RTR decks have you considered? there are low risk, high performance, relatively easy to service, USA choices.I heard from Ballfinger. They will ship to Canada, so I assume they will ship to the USA. 16 week lead-time.
Still not sure I want to drop $16k USD without hearing it first, and I worry about parts availability. I don't think it's as easy as visiting an "electronics guy" when something fails. Modern processors and boards being what they are, it will not be as easy to fix these as the older machines.
On a side note: I actually think that Nagra's experience with R2R is what makes their Turntable drive so interesting. Spinning a platter has more in common with spinning a reel than I initially thought.
16 k usd .I heard from Ballfinger. They will ship to Canada, so I assume they will ship to the USA. 16 week lead-time.
Still not sure I want to drop $16k USD without hearing it first, and I worry about parts availability. I don't think it's as easy as visiting an "electronics guy" when something fails. Modern processors and boards being what they are, it will not be as easy to fix these as the older machines.
On a side note: I actually think that Nagra's experience with R2R is what makes their Turntable drive so interesting. Spinning a platter has more in common with spinning a reel than I initially thought.
there´s a recent French totally new machine from ground up tooNone really, I need a thin form factor as this would have to be wall mounted. I don't think anyone is making new decks other than Ballfinger or the Greek company, or are there others?
I'm not sure I want to take the plunge either... tape content is very low compared to vinyl, and unless the tape is a very close copy to a master tape, I think my Nagra Reference TT with Nagra cartridge and incoming HD Phono will sound better. Certainly Nagra has said as much, and they have a ton of tape experience, obviously.
I also think that Nagra will launch a new R2R deck for their 75th Anniversary in a few years. Just a guess on my part, but I wouldn't be surprised.
with your Nagra turntable, doubtful these new smaller form factor tape decks will have much to offer you performance wise. i could be very wrong. but the only way to find out is to hear one in a proper system context compared to a known tt.None really, I need a thin form factor as this would have to be wall mounted. I don't think anyone is making new decks other than Ballfinger or the Greek company, or are there others?
tape provenance is one issue, the original recording quality is maybe more an issue. tape content availability has much to do with your musical tastes. if you want iconic recordings many times those are not the best sounding, even at low generation. and the best ones will cost you. but there are plenty of recently recorded high quality tapes that are well done. but the performances are not consistent. so it's a mixed bag. but it does take a good deck with high quality heads and output electronics to get blown away by tape. especially when you have high level vinyl. but when you hear great tape playback, nothing can compare.I'm not sure I want to take the plunge either... tape content is very low compared to vinyl, and unless the tape is a very close copy to a master tape,
seeing that Nagra hit the turntable marketplace at $150k+ USD retail level, hold on to your hat for their expectation for a new Nagra tape deck. likely over $200k.I think my Nagra Reference TT with Nagra cartridge and incoming HD Phono will sound better. Certainly Nagra has said as much, and they have a ton of tape experience, obviously.
I also think that Nagra will launch a new R2R deck for their 75th Anniversary in a few years. Just a guess on my part, but I wouldn't be surprised.
Indeed, I would not be shocked if a new Nagra "Reference line" R2R came in at $200k retail. If you add the cost of the Reference TT+Cartridge+HD Phono, it's just under $300k.with your Nagra turntable, doubtful these new smaller form factor tape decks will have much to offer you performance wise. i could be wrong. but the only way to find out is to hear one in a proper system context compared to a known tt.
seeing that Nagra hit the turntable marketplace at $150k+ USD retail level, hold on to your hat for their expectation for a new Nagra tape deck. likely over $200k.
the Ampex ATR-102 decks from ATR Service Inc will have parts availability and ease of serviceability beyond any of these new decks. you can buy a better than new ATR and choose degrees of performance; from dead stock to extreme hot rodding. and it's all USA stuff.None really, I need a thin form factor as this would have to be wall mounted. I don't think anyone is making new decks other than Ballfinger or the Greek company, or are there others?
From Analogue Productions comes another classic title in our Ultra Tape reel-to-reel album reissue series. Each is a 15 ips, ¼-inch analog tape copy (IEC equalization) sourced from a copy of the original analog master tape. Transferred real-time, using an ATR-modified Ampex Tape Machine with flux magnetic heads
You have to bear in mind that copying a tape is a much more straightforward process than cutting lacquer. There is no mechanical process involved. As long as the machines are properly aligned and of good sound quality (as most machines used in professional studios tend to be), the loss is much less than when cutting vinyl. And there is no need to apply any compression which might be necessary for cutting LP. In the end, you need to listen for yourself to decide. The best LPs are cut from analogue sources anyway, which means tapes. Any hiss on the tape will be transferred to the vinyl. There are sources that will make copies of production masters that were used to cut lacquers. That means the tape copy will be the same generation as the lacquer if you want to look at it that way.Thanks guys, checking out the ATR site now.
Also, when Analog Productions says they transferred the tape they are selling “from a copy of the original master tape”, does that mean the tape they are selling is the 2nd copy from the master?