I wasn't referring to modern VINYL recordings (which I agree are almost all digital) or any particular format necessarily, just the art/science of modern recordings in general. All I'm trying to say here is that there are fantastic recordings being released that aren't available on vinyl, and therefore digital remains important to me as a music lover. I don't want to just hear the same interpretations of classical music over and over, I appreciate the work of modern recording artists.
CH Precision C1.2
- Thread starter Jambo
- Start date
It was my favourite digital last year at the Munchen show after WADAX .
Clean detailed / good sounding but Wadax was on another level (to my ears )
MSB was a bit disappointing .
I listened for about an hour in total to the Roy gregory / sterling trayle demos.
CH / Tech Das versus CH digital , LP was a clear winner more detail / organic sound
Totally agree on not listening to same interpretations over and over. One should listen to more than ten of each for sure. But they need to be quality performances and recordings
btw this is exactly why I am in favour of streaming. Listening to many interpretations on quality LPs is available but expensive while on streaming it is easy. Also, some quality performances from, for example, Heifetz which are not well recorded on vinyl I prefer to listen on digital.
however that is a completely different statement from incorrectly saying that old LPs don’t have good piano.
Last edited:
I heard DCS (incl the APEX ) on iirc wilson D agostino / and some more DCS on other set ups ...not even close.
But i ve never been much of a DCS fan
But i ve never been much of a DCS fan
Last edited:
Never my intention to say older LPs don't have good piano. Perhaps I could have worded it better but this is what I said:
I've yet to hear solo piano on any vinyl rival modern recordings. Not saying the older ones are terrible or anything, just that some recent ones are outstanding.
I'm not trying to be adversarial. I've never heard digital that I think sounded as good as vinyl (in general that is - and I've heard Wadax) and I only posted because I don't think the CH digital is going to match CH phono. Heck, all the CH dealers I know focus on other digital brands. I wish it could be the case though as I love digital.
A small update from me, I‘ve been happily using my C1.2, I never did buy an X1 as i had a power conditioning which seem to improve the C1/C1.2 so about 5 years I got a T1 (without GPS) instead. Then today my GPS module arrived for my T1, it took seriously long time for the GSP signal to sync On my T1, as i live in an apartment and the GPS signal is very weak.
But once it had finally synced, it felt like my C1.2 became C1.25, the improvement along the same lines as from C1 to C1.2, but not quite as profound or as big.
But once it had finally synced, it felt like my C1.2 became C1.25, the improvement along the same lines as from C1 to C1.2, but not quite as profound or as big.
I would agree the GPS module makes a very big different to the performance of the T1. It should be a standard item on the T1 or at least you should purchase it as an option.
Hello
I wonder what other CD players that can be in the same sound quality neighborhood
as an expensive turntable for example, the Air Force three premium or the clearaudio master innovation. Subjective sound like relaxed sound, realism, and density of music.
I'm wondering if the Esoteric grandioso K1XSE (available late 2023) or K1X would qualify? Or DCS rossini Apex.
The esoteric k01x does not. In my opinion. It would take quite a jump in sound quality to get what I want.
This thought may be repeated in another thread, in order to get more exposure of this idea. It seems like no one in the audio press ever compares digital to analog.
I wonder what other CD players that can be in the same sound quality neighborhood
as an expensive turntable for example, the Air Force three premium or the clearaudio master innovation. Subjective sound like relaxed sound, realism, and density of music.
I'm wondering if the Esoteric grandioso K1XSE (available late 2023) or K1X would qualify? Or DCS rossini Apex.
The esoteric k01x does not. In my opinion. It would take quite a jump in sound quality to get what I want.
This thought may be repeated in another thread, in order to get more exposure of this idea. It seems like no one in the audio press ever compares digital to analog.
Forgive me if I missed something here, but if you are looking for "relaxed sound, realism, and density of music" why not just put your favorite CD transport in front of a LampizatOr Baltic 4 (or higher LampizatOr model)?
Hello Ron
I am looking for more detail, with relaxed sound. Dynamic also. Turntable, being heavy, has the bass.
I want to be happy with cd. I would be if I ignored analog. It's hard to verbalize. I could try k1x but if I try it, I own it.
I can look into lampizator but I wonder if replacement tubes will continue to be available.
The do-nothing option is possible, just realize cd has its inherent sound.
Stopgap could be a 10k unit for a while. Until I have the 46k or 90k for ch precision. Or chance the esoteric grandioso which is final cd player.
Bill
For relaxed & musical yet detailed sound, please have a look of the Metronome AQWO Series.
page AQWO GB - METRONOME - Hifi haut de gamme made in France
Range AQWO AQWO 2 – t|AQWO – c|AQWO Métronome’s great expertise allows us to offer you devices that are truly adapted to your requirements, whether you are a pure CD and SACD enthusiast or a user of hi-resolution music. We […]
www.metronome.audio
For a no-limit budget, the Kalista Dreamplay Series is even better.
DreamPlay X | Kalista 2024
DreamPlay X : un appareil entièrement nouveau alliant le design Kalista et la haute technologie d’une source audio-digitale universelle, avec les fonctionnalités de lecture de CD, SACD, streaming et une option DAC avec pré-ampli digital.
kalista-audio.com
Elliot G.
Industry Expert
Me too especially with the CH D1.5 connected with the CH digital data interconnect to give the full 705.6kHz sampling rate playing Red Book CDs.
Would then love to do a direct A to B comparison with my Chord Blu (with inbuilt M Scaler) and Chord DAVE connected with dual Wave High Fidelity STORM Reference BNC digital data interconnects that also gives me the full 705.6kHz sampling rate with playing Red Book CDs.
I have borrowed CH1.2 from my dealer for home audition for 10 days. I have an ARC6 Chord DAVE. I love my DAVE. I have compared it to MSB Select II over a period of 6 months in my system. I don’t judge performance based on price. Believe it or not, in my system, DAVE beats Select II comprehensively.
Back to C1.2, I only do local file streaming. My files are offline upsampled to 16FS using PGGB software. The first day impression of C1.2 is not very favourable. Not too sure whether it is cold and needs to warm up. But as days go by, I grow to love C1.2. I appreciate C1.2 qualities. The presentation is different. DAVE is more punchy and a bit raw. C1.2 is more smooth and graceful. I would say DAVE is like a heavyweight boxer and C1.2 is like a ballet dancer. But what ulimately wins me over is that C1.2 is rock solid in imaging and the imaging is very details. In comparison, DAVE imaging is wavy and blurry. I am shocked at this. Why am I shocked? Because C1.2 is a R2R DAC. R2R DACs have intrinsic linearity problems as the resistors can’t be 100% matched. DS DACs should better at resolution. But this is what I find.
At the end of my 10 days home audition, I find C1.2 is a superior DAC. One caveat is that my files are offline upsampled to 16FS before feeding to both DAC. So in essence, I do not use the upsampling function of C1.2. I have confirmed this with Florian.
Will I upgrade to C1.2? No. Because Chord is going to have Ultima DAC and CH is going to have C10 this year. I will wait for them.
Last edited:
Would also be great to also throw in the CH X1 for the C1.2 and the Sean Jacobs DC4-ARC6 or the Farad Super3 or even the Super10 for the Chord DAVE into the mix for the comparison !.
I found a big improvement with my Chord DAVE with having the Chord M Scaler (initially as the one box solution then later upgrading my Chord Blu MK1 CD Transport by Chord Electronics to have an inbuilt M Scaler like the MK2) with connecting them together (DAVE & Blu) with the superb Wave High Fidelity STORM Digital Data BNC interconnects. These additions put a lot of 'meat on the bone' to the music I was hearing.
Wondering if purchasing and installing either the Sean Jacobs DC4-ARC6 or the Farad Super3 or Super10 external linear power supplies for my Chord DAVE would nicely complete my digital source set-up with further improvement to the sound i.e. even 'more meat on the bone' to the sound, bigger (deeper and wider) sound stage, even higher clarity etc. as written in a number of online reviews and WBF Members feedback who have installed one of these external linear power supplies to their Chord DAVE.
By the end of this year, I will be in a dilemma with my next upgrade for my UK HiFi System of whether to buy a Sean Jacobs DC4-ARC6 or the Farad Super3 or Super10 for my Chord DAVE or think about purchasing a CH 1.2 in 2025 (and selling my Chord DAVE to help fund a C1.2, but with using my Chord Blu CD Transport I will only be getting a maximum 352kHz sampling rate into and from the C1.2 with a single digital data BNC interconnect) or purchasing another CH P1 and X1 to have a full mono CH P1 Phono Stage in 2025 for my TT set-up (along with an upgrade replacement for my MSL Eminent Ex cartridge (i.e. a MSL Signature Gold or Platinum etc.) by end of this year as by end of 2024 my Ex will surely have 1,200+ ours of use on it).
Similar threads
