I basically agree with you...but if I was over 70 and a diabetic or had a respiratory condition I would be concerned...Be brave and call out the BS. You are a scientist and this clearly does not pass the smell test.
I basically agree with you...but if I was over 70 and a diabetic or had a respiratory condition I would be concerned...Be brave and call out the BS. You are a scientist and this clearly does not pass the smell test.
The person who supports IT infrastructure or tends the grounds at J&J or GSK work in the Pharma Industry. Doesn’t mean they know diddly squat about Corona Virus.Stay far from any such vaccine! If you know the timescale for safe drug development, you would understand.
Switzerland (Govt) bought tons of Tamiflu years ago for $$$$ due to a previous dud "pandemic" and now has to dump all that expired stock.
I don't use any social media for info on this. Recall I said I work in Pharma? Don't fall for the obvious con. If you fall for everything, you stand for nothing.
Gone by Summer...mark my words. Past is prologue!
A recent outbreak in an aged care facility in Australia is a sobering moment. Aged care systems are areas of great vulnerability obviously given the virus impact on the over 70’s. I am glad both my parents are in private homes away from these institutions.The economic consequences of Covid 19 are serious not because it is a particularly lethal virus, but because of the huge increase in global trade with China in particular. I t has had the worst outbreak to date and the resultant closure of so many of its factories and the disruption of international supply chains is causing huge problems.
They are distinct from the actual health threat which is serious and will continue for some time yet, but I agree that it should not be overestimated and is nowhere near the level of the Spanish flu epidemic.
Here in the UK we now have 85 confirmed cases, most of which can be traced back to Northern Italy. There have,however, been 3 cases which have no apparent link to other parts of the world and thus of greater concern. The expectation is that the number of cases will increase but there is no real panic and the Govt has published a sensible strategy to deal with the out break. no blanket closures of schools,banning of large scale events etc yet but an option if needed.
Here in Europe we have free health care of generally good quality which is coping pretty well although Italy is under a lot of pressure. The death rate there is down to the large numbers of old people there.
The question in my mind is how will America with its system of private health care cope in the event of a serious outbreak in its population?
Summer is a few months away. We shall all see by then. Arguments over...just sit back relax and enjoy the non event. It seems lots of people have problems interpreting data....The person who supports IT infrastructure or tends the grounds at J&J or GSK work in the Pharma Industry. Doesn’t mean they know diddly squat about Corona Virus.
Your claims appear to be based on unfounded optimism and what appears to be a fair degree of unconscious ignorance i.e you don’t know what you don’t know. What we do know is that this virus spreads very rapidly, seems to infect in the absence of symptoms, has the potential to overwhelm a country’s health care facilities and cause huge disruption in any number of industries. You get one chance to control an epidemic.....right at the start, when you have enough resources to isolate infected individuals and trace their contacts. Once you overwhelm those resources, which can happen in very short order, you’re down to managing the consequences.
Calling this a con is, in my view a. Irresponsible and b. Based on ignorance or misplaced optimism. This virus, mishandled has the attributes to utterly change the way we live, where attending concerts, sporting events or travelling on holiday becomes a threat rather than a pleasure. The problem with this virus are the multitude of transmission vectors in our everyday life, from banknotes to touchscreen ticket sales at almost every railway station and airport.
As to your point about the Swiss and Tamiflu. What would you prefer....that your Government do nothing and have no stocks of medication to treat a potential outbreak?. When a Government lays in stocks of anti-virals, its in the sincere hope that they won’t be needed. That’s the best outcome! Not one to scoff at in hindsight.
Right now people need to be galvanised to take the right actions....thoroughly washing and disinfecting hands, not touching their face when out and about, self isolating in the event of any symptoms etc. The fastest way to get the outcome you’re hoping for is by taking all the right actions NOW! The right balance is in talking all the proper precautions now before it becomes a pandemic. Not waiting until it does.
As to your point about avoiding a future vaccine. I strongly suggest you wait until we have one and evaluate the clinical trials that were conducted to assure its safety before warning people not to use it. Anything else is irresponsible
The worst thing we can be at this time is complacent. This is a really dire threat and the consequences of wrong action unconscionable.
This is proof of people overreacting to fear inducements. Has nothing to do with the facts of the virus.And that's not me ...
Why don’t you give us your well reasoned, scientific arguments to support your position. You seem very certain, so I think it would be interesting to discuss the underlying knowledge and logic.Summer is a few months away. We shall all see by then. Arguments over...just sit back relax and enjoy the non event. It seems lots of people have problems interpreting data....
I did, go back and read....though I think you have made up your mind. In that case...wait for Summer and we shall see.Why don’t you give us your well reasoned, scientific arguments to support your position. You seem very certain, so I think it would be interesting to discuss the underlying knowledge and logic.
What this paper I saying is that the majority of deaths in the Spanish flu pandemic were potentially caused by concomitant bacterial infections of the lower respitory tract. Their conclusion is that for the next pandemic the focus should be as much on control of concomitant bacterial infections as much as on anti-virals and vaccineshttps://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/14/8/07-1313_article
Abstract
Deaths during the 1918–19 influenza pandemic have been attributed to a hypervirulent influenza strain. Hence, preparations for the next pandemic focus almost exclusively on vaccine prevention and antiviral treatment for infections with a novel influenza strain. However, we hypothesize that infections with the pandemic strain generally caused self-limited (rarely fatal) illnesses that enabled colonizing strains of bacteria to produce highly lethal pneumonias. This sequential-infection hypothesis is consistent with characteristics of the 1918–19 pandemic, contemporaneous expert opinion, and current knowledge regarding the pathophysiologic effects of influenza viruses and their interactions with respiratory bacteria. This hypothesis suggests opportunities for prevention and treatment during the next pandemic (e.g., with bacterial vaccines and antimicrobial drugs), particularly if a pandemic strain–specific vaccine is unavailable or inaccessible to isolated, crowded, or medically underserved populations.