I promise you the venues in Europe are just as good.Until you have been to the clubs in St. Louis, Chicago, New Orleans or Austin…..
I promise you the venues in Europe are just as good.Until you have been to the clubs in St. Louis, Chicago, New Orleans or Austin…..
This is interesting, speaking of amplified instruments:While acoustic instruments sound better unamplified, I don't see why someone who mainly listened to electric guitar (yes inc amp/effects) couldn't use a live performance of that as their reference at home.
Not something I’m worried about. Not looking for audiophile status.Frankly I give words more credence from people who list their systems. Makes them seem less anonymous, less virtual.
There is more Irony in your response that perhaps you are aware of, some are here purely for that self gratification.Not something I’m worried about. Not looking for audiophile status.
I have some live “audience” Grateful Dead tapes, the ones recorded up front, in front of the soundboard, by fans with those weird looking binaural mics on tall stalks on Nakamichi cassette decks, that are VERY convincing. It’s enough to make the hair on the back of your head stand up.Reproduction at home doesn't have to sound exactly the same as what we hear live but as long as it's realistic it can feel like we're at a live performance. Some audiophiles regard listening at home a poor second choice compared to live, not sure why
Sure I have been. They are okay.I promise you the venues in Europe are just as good.
Ok, Ok Dutchy, you got me ! I made it all up ! I have a good imagination though , you have to give me that !Exactly , but that also excludes phrases in so called member " signature systems " like...
one day to own / hope to own, ...
These don t count as well , first put your money where your mouth is and we go from there .
PS. If people post anonymous their whole stereo system might not exist at all
He uses a Oticon in ear microphone with built in streaming and DSP !To what?
They are totally different experiences and can’t be reasonably compared.
I think it’s kind of a shame that so many audiophiles that on the rare occasions they do go to a live acoustic concert go there with the futile objective of forming a mythical objective aural memory of sound rather than just taking the concert in for the wonderful and unique experience that it is.
So, whose pictures did you steal and claim for your own?Ok, Ok Dutchy, you got me ! I made it all up ! I have a good imagination though , you have to give me that !
That's me with a early model Oticon, i think Ortofon makes parts for them !So, whose pictures did you steal and claim for your own?
And when a person has some of the same equipment I use, it puts their further experiments (new gear, tweaks, etc.) into context for me. If I'm really interested in the new stuff, I PM the person for further information. That has proved very helpful because there are some very experienced audiophiles here. And it is always nice to chat with a fellow weirdo.Frankly I give words more credence from people who list their systems. Makes them seem less anonymous, less virtual.
YeahSo many?
Who are these many? How do you know this is what people are doing?
You can speak for everyone you know?Everyone I know goes to listen to live music to have a good time and experience live music.
I don’t recall reading it.They happen to leave with a better understanding of what live music sounds like, but that doesn’t detract from their enjoyment of the actual experience. Have you read Al M‘s account in the live concert thread of his recent trip to the Boston symphony orchestra?
I don’t recall reading it.
But sometimes you can look at someones system and know he is so full of it, obviously overestimating what it can do, or his own hearing capabilities ! Without a system list i give very little credit to a posters assessments. I am not saying everyone has to submit a perfect hearing test and own equipment in the hundreds of thousand range, but some gear just don't cut it in my personal opinion !I happen to be in the camp that believes you cannot tell very much from lists of system components, not even from photos of the system, even if it looks fabulous. The Emperor’s New Clothes sort of thing.
A rich man has about as much chance of getting into audio heaven as a camel has of passing through the eye of a needle. - audiophile axiom
Well, you can tell if they use digital or vinyl or both. Within the digital realm, there are those who are "closed system" folks who use either a transport and/or streamer with server (meaning, not streaming from the internet). Then there are strange folks like me who stream from the internet for 95% of their listening. Does that mean I'm not an audiophile? I don't know. I know I love music and the rest is the means to the end.I happen to be in the camp that believes you cannot tell very much from lists of system components,
Regarding what I’ve marked above as point A, I agree that listing and seeing do not lead logically to believing. Hearing is the narrow gate. I think the analogy with the emperor’s new clothes fails though … the emperor thought he had things of beauty, but he had nothing. In the audio visual porn world, there is real beauty.A. I happen to be in the camp that believes you cannot tell very much from lists of system components, not even from photos of the system, even if it looks fabulous. The Emperor’s New Clothes sort of thing.
B. A rich man has about as much chance of getting into audio heaven as a camel has of passing through the eye of a needle. - audiophile axiom