Interesting, @christensenleif@msn.com uses the Holton on his massive bass horns
Let me try to explain the sonics differences. I am not very good at describing and easily loss for words. Hope you don't mind. I have only tried DSAauio on Axiom and Esturo Gold on Graham but not vs versa yet. The DSAUDIO/Axiom combo has a very high resolution and density. When listening to a large symphony piece, each piece of instruments can be heard/seen in its position in space. I can also hear the sense of space around each piece of instruments. It is a gentlemen, well composed, full of confidence and keep everything under control. The Estura Gold/Graham has a lower resolution and density (only relative to DSAudio, it is one of the best I have heard). But it is still very dynamic. With Graham Elite, may be due to the shorter arm. It is more exciting, particularly in rock music. It is a young lady, full of energy, flamboyant but sometimes almost out of control but not in a bad way.Thank you for that explanation. It makes sense. The comparison involves both the different cartridges and the different arms. I find it difficult to attribute the sound heard to just the cartridges. Do you have a preference between the two arms, and also between the two cartridges? I always find it difficult to make such comparisons, even if only one variable changes, because the set up process may always be slightly different. I guess we do the best we can until satisfied.
Wow that’s some great information and I’ll work on getting optimal setup - for what I have available to me - this weekend.The Grand Master Equalizer is very sensitive to vibration. I tried many different footers and isolation methods and now end up using Accurion i4 active isolation platform for the main unit and Stillpoints Ultra 5 for the power supply. This combination gives the best sound in my system.
The sound is also different with the long and short umbilical cords. You may want to try them both. The short ones do not always sound better.
HI RonI am told there is no digital component at all. If there were, then I would not be excited.
I had a home demo of both units and significantly preferred the EMM Labs equalizer in my room. Better detail and more natural sounding. I didn't find the two very close in performance to my ears, and would definitely encourage a home demo of both in your own system if you were deciding between the two. You can PM me for details of the EMM Labs dealer who easily arranged my 2-week home demo if that would help you.I’m seriously considering a Grand Master with the Master 1 EQ. Can you describe the difference between the Master 1 EQ and the EMM Labs unit?
Where in the UK if you don't mind me asking ?ok UK based just installed DS003 and matching EQ box £5k uk pounds. using an SME Model 15 with series V Arm on a kinetic systems air platform.
Not wishing to throw the term "game changer" around but I feel it is so natural from top to bottom, no restriction on low end setting into active ATC 150s, as super tramp say Bloody marvellous!
would love to try EMM labs EQ box and/or try grand master with this Ds003 eq unit.
So one word description "effortless"
Nice post Dogberry. I too have just had my 55 yr old plus Deccas 4RC, C4E.Does anyone else notice a consistent fact about the wonder-cartridges? They all address the issue of mass on the cantilever. The Soundsmith straingauge lets the cantilever push against a dielectric without necessarily having to move at all on the proximal side of the grommet suspension. The DS has only the negligible mass of two wafer thin screens to shade a pair of LEDs. The AT Art1000 has its moving coils mounted right by the stylus.
It might be a little easier for me to see this convergence as I've been a fan of Decca cartridges, where there is no conventional cantilever, with vibration in one plane measured right from the stylus holder, and in the other just above it on the armature. I know, they have a reputation, something like 'fantastic but unreliable'. Probably well-deserved at one time, but since John Wright took over manufacture it has not been true at all. I have a Jubilee and a Reference. Recently I sent the Reference for a final rebuild (John is retiring and there is no one to take over, partly as the company making the armatures has gone too). So I decided to look at other takes on the moving iron principle, Nagaoka, Grado and Soundsmith, partly to see if there was a viable alternative, and partly to find something to stretch out the life of my London Decca Reference. I found the Nagaoka MP-500 is remarkably good for the price, and simulates a Decca quite well if you aren't paying close attention. A Grado Lineage Statement 3 left me unmoved (what a shame!) The Soundsmith Sussurro II is kinda halfway between the MP-500 and the Statement 3. The MP-500 was good enough to inspire me to buy a second SME TT to keep it on, so I may stretch out the life of my Deccas by using it much of the time. In fact that table has an SME arm with interchangeable headshells so I can play with a lot of pickups rather easily, and I changed my phono stage to allow five stored presets to facilitate this (a Nu-Vista Vinyl).
I may not be around to see it, but I suspect that the theory propounded by Peter Ledermann will become accepted fact eventually: the least amount of moving mass is the best amount, whether or not we buy into stylus jitter and cactus cantilevers. Don't the wonder-cartridges all confirm this?
Spirit - have you heard the DS Audio grand master or any of their carts, and would you be able to relate to the SS SG?Can't disagree about the Straingauge. It has an unerring ability to sound very realistic with amazing tone and speed. Maybe not as fleshed out as the DaVa I've heard twice at Audiophile Bill, but very saturated nevertheless, and I wouldn't swap the cart for anything else regarding it's speed.
Has taken me some time to dial it in and eradicate any propensity for skeletalness.
A "wonder cart" indeed.