I read your response to Mikes response. I was thinking something similar to what Mike said. I was and was not surprised getting rid of room treatments helped. Elliot said something along the lines in another thread that homeowners can make mistakes with room treatments. I can see this. I have a suspician dealers and some room professionals over treat to, instead of focusing on optimum placement of speakers, seating and equipment. Almost like DSP guys trying to tamp it down with processing. Tamp it down with traps. That is why I supported Robert Harley and the way he did his room. I would rather a blank canvass than permanent fixtures. I did say I would open ceiling space if needed to .ake my room work. Thats was a bit knee jerk on my part. I will try surface stuff. Who knows how the room may change over time.I was not the guy. I was just tagging along to help move things around and learn something. I was pretty surprised that unplugging subwoofers that had been already turned off made a difference to the sound.
The system was basically stripped down to the essentials, accessories, and room treatments removed, and then the sound came alive and sounded much more realistic and convincing. It was quite a transformation.
It’s just an anecdotal example about turning something off and even unplugging it can improve the sound of the system.
you mean this love tap?Nice Mike.
That Jazdoc guy. Only a best friend could call you out that strongly.
love to. set up a time with @jazdoc and i'll be there. speaker set-up in someone else's room is not one of my super powers. but i'll do what i can. it will be fun. i will bring my work clothes and expect to work up a sweat. i know jazdoc is a whimp. i've moved heavy turntables with him.Both of you are welcome to come to Vashon and help set my speakers in the room. See my space.
there is also the predisposition of sonic perspectives. dogma is dogma.I read your response to Mikes response. I was thinking something similar to what Mike said. I was and was not surprised getting rid of room treatments helped. Elliot said something along the lines in another thread that homeowners can make mistakes with room treatments. I can see this. I have a suspician dealers and some room professionals over treat to, instead of focusing on optimum placement of speakers, seating and equipment. Almost like DSP guys trying to tamp it down with processing. Tamp it down with traps. That is why I supported Robert Harley and the way he did his room. I would rather a blank canvass than permanent fixtures. I did say I would open ceiling space if needed to .ake my room work. Thats was a bit knee jerk on my part. I will try surface stuff. Who knows how the room may change over time.
i had watched Steve Guttenberg's video review and expected more from the TEAC transport naked (i did add a $1500 S/PDIF cable). but i suppose performance expectations vary from user to user. i guess i should not be surprised. but it was unlistenable to me in stock form.@Mike Lavigne
A bit disappointing the transport is that bad without the clock. I still wonder about a Jays Audio Lab. But I don't think that would bridge the gap.
i do expect that any decent clock and clock cable will take you from a digital sounding transport, to another level. how the actual transition will go and at what price point i don't know. but i would not fall in love with any transport in and of itself. it's the clock.I at time consider $$$ into my server to up its performance. The solution I am told is a new JCat card with an external clock with LPS attached to the card.
Maybe what I wonder is how your TEAC would sound with a $2000 clock???? It seems the clock matters. But how far do you have to go. At least for a guy like me.
there is also the predisposition of sonic perspectives. dogma is dogma.
many forces can be at work. real and imagined. there are matters of taste and opinions.
I have always suspected Teac, Esoteric and DCS to dumb down their internal clocks, so you can really hear a difference when the expensive clock gets added. Other manufacturers manage to make great sounding machines without external clocks, just another expensive box to sell.i had watched Steve Guttenberg's video review and expected more from the TEAC transport naked (i did add a $1500 S/PDIF cable). but i suppose performance expectations vary from user to user. i guess i should not be surprised. but it was unlistenable to me in stock form.
my guess is that you can throw all the transports (beyond the cheapest level) into a heap, and choose one. any one. then the one with the best interface will win, until you bring in a heavy hitting clock and clock cable then that will trounce the one with the best interface.
the mechanicals are besides the point. it's all about the clock. the interface might provide a good clock, but not in the league with the best stand alone clocks.
beyond that is the dac, and if you have a Wadax dac with forward looking error correction then winner-winner chicken dinner.
i do expect that any decent clock and clock cable will take you from a digital sounding transport, to another level. how the actual transition will go and at what price point i don't know. but i would not fall in love with any transport in and of itself. it's the clock.
but as i sit here and listen to this transport now as i go along, it's quite clear what is going on.
my viewpoint here is quite narrow so i'm just a data point right now, not the whole picture. it could be a more nuanced situation than it appears from where i sit. i expected that maybe my clock might be a factor, but i had no idea how much.
i've never gone to the trouble to compare 'uber' clocks myself, but i have seen shootouts about them. but from what i have read, separate chassis, power supplies, and exotic approaches do result in performance advances, which do equate to better sound. i know that some pro audio facilities spend big bucks on clocks as it pays dividends.I have always suspected Teac, Esoteric and DCS to dumb down their internal clocks, so you can really hear a difference when the expensive clock gets added. Other manufacturers manage to make great sounding machines without external clocks, just another expensive box to sell.
In studios they have a lot of different machines syncing up to a common clock, it makes sense. Companies like Gryphon, Burmester, MBL and Kalista manage to make reference CD players without external clocks.i've never gone to the trouble to compare 'uber' clocks myself, but i have seen shootouts about them. but from what i have read, separate chassis, power supplies, and exotic approaches do result in performance advances, which do equate to better sound. i know that some pro audio facilities spend big bucks on clocks as it pays dividends.
on board clocks i'm sure run the gamut of performance. are some dumbed down? i suppose it's possible.
what my Esoteric G1X clock did for my Esoteric T1 turntable was subtle but musically significant, and the transformation of this modest TEAC transport is hard to argue with.
you mean this love tap?
that's what friends are for. and i responded in kind.
love to. set up a time with @jazdoc and i'll be there. speaker set-up in someone else's room is not one of my super powers. but i'll do what i can. it will be fun. i will bring my work clothes and expect to work up a sweat. i know jazdoc is a whimp. i've moved heavy turntables with him.
How many hours on the new Transport before you went to the uber expensive clock?.... Unless a minimum of 100 hours on the Teac, I suspect part of what you were experiencing ( unpleasant, brittle, etc.) may be because of that... I have not used your particular transport, however have experience with several others over the years, and they did require some time to settle, etc.i had watched Steve Guttenberg's video review and expected more from the TEAC transport naked (i did add a $1500 S/PDIF cable). but i suppose performance expectations vary from user to user. i guess i should not be surprised. but it was unlistenable to me in stock form.
my guess is that you can throw all the transports (beyond the cheapest level) into a heap, and choose one. any one. then the one with the best interface will win, until you bring in a heavy hitting clock and clock cable then that will trounce the one with the best interface.
the mechanicals are besides the point. it's all about the clock. the interface might provide a good clock, but not in the league with the best stand alone clocks.
beyond that is the dac, and if you have a Wadax dac with forward looking error correction then winner-winner chicken dinner.
i do expect that any decent clock and clock cable will take you from a digital sounding transport, to another level. how the actual transition will go and at what price point i don't know. but i would not fall in love with any transport in and of itself. it's the clock.
but as i sit here and listen to this transport now as i go along, it's quite clear what is going on.
my viewpoint here is quite narrow so i'm just a data point right now, not the whole picture. it could be a more nuanced situation than it appears from where i sit. i expected that maybe my clock might be a factor, but i had no idea how much.
fair enough. your point is legit.How many hours on the new Transport before you went to the uber expensive clock?.... Unless a minimum of 100 hours on the Teac, I suspect part of what you were experiencing ( unpleasant, brittle, etc.) may be because of that... I have not used your particular transport, however have experience with several others over the years, and they did require some time to settle, etc.
Indeed, the TEAC model may even be sufficient to bring about a substantial improvement: https://teac.jp/int/product/cg-10m-a/featurei have no idea how good a clock one needs to push this modest transport to this level. but with this clock connected i am very impressed by what i'm hearing. obviously the Wadax is doing the heavy lifting. but without the right clock, likely don't bother with this transport. my streaming stomps it completely......and it was not very listenable to my ears.
got the Esoteric T1 turntable March 23', the clock arrived for it April 23'. there was much discussion of it at that time on that thread and you were there a little too.So Mike, you're saying the same clock that controls the tachometer for your Esoteric turntable, it's the same one that processes the signal with your TEAC transport. It took me a minute to put together what you were saying That's crazy a TT motor comtroller benefit enough from a external clock that one would spend $17k to get that last bit of good.
turntable motors and power supplies are critical things, especially as performance improves and noise floors of systems drop, these type things become the limitations of performance, so small incremental steps are where we see the best separate from the very good. not everyone equally believes power cords should (can) be improved. YMMV.I remember Joe Pitman years back telling me about a power cable upgrade to a TT motor improves the sound from the TT. It sounded crazy to most people back then. Myself included. I didn't gwt it. Now its not just a power cord. It's an external clock. Crazy times.