finally updated my system pictures; new racks, tone arm, cartridge, change in turntables, added digital pieces

Mike
Thanks to the newsletter, I just noticed your thread. You continue to look for that last bit of SQ in your systems. Having a dedicated room is a major plus. Congrats. I promised my wife I am done. Enjoy the music.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike Lavigne
What are the dimensions of your room? It looks long and relatively narrow, but perhaps that’s the camera angle? I recall Harry Pearson was in favor of such rooms. In his various listening rooms at Sea Cliff, which he fastidiously documented in TAS, most had this shape. He used to argue many concert halls have this shoebox like design (e.g., the hall that the Boston Symphony plays in, when the orchestra plays fortissimo, you hear the echo from one end of the hall to the other).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike Lavigne
What are the dimensions of your room? It looks long and relatively narrow, but perhaps that’s the camera angle?
right. it is the camera perspective. my 12mm setting on my lens trying to capture as much as possible. my widest lens use to be 16mm. if i was standing next to my speakers it would give the room a size reference and it would be easy to appreciate the actual size and width.
I recall Harry Pearson was in favor of such rooms. In his various listening rooms at Sea Cliff, which he fastidiously documented in TAS, most had this shape. He used to argue many concert halls have this shoebox like design (e.g., the hall that the Boston Symphony plays in, when the orchestra plays fortissimo, you hear the echo from one end of the hall to the other).
my room designer felt that large space/performance hall acoustics are quite different in some ways from small domestic room acoustics. but i'm no expert about it. try to put hifi speakers in a performance hall, they don't work. they don't 'scale up' either. just a different kind of thing.

my room is 29' long x 21' wide x 11' tall. so it's quite wide; due to my desire to accommodate multi-channel 5.1 SACD back in 2004. needed 115 degrees wide for the rear channels. tried the 5.1 for 18 months then removed it since my vinyl out multi-channeled my multi-channel so i re-tasked that investment into other things. but the width remained and it has always delivered space and bloom. and the music has great energy.

oval shaped, ceiling broken up into chambers. finished in 3/4" finish grade plywood, zero painted sheetrock. -4- floor to ceiling bass traps along the rear wall. no absorption, all diffusion. wood composite over concrete floor.
 
Last edited:

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu