Update:
After putting the Beyma CP350TI/Iwata 600 up to 2Khz and getting very nice sound with that setup, I switched the drivers to the Radians, set them up at 2Khz and got out the measuring tools. Other than roll off starting above 5-6Khz, the response was very flat as measured (+- about 2db from 80-5000Hz.) With a mild boost at 10Khz to still have a small roll off but a bit more air (response down a few db at 20Khz) I settled in to listen. In some ways there is more information coming from the Radian in terms of "apparent" detail, it also seems noisier between the notes and the feeling of flatness did not disappear completely. I found it again after a while to be fatiguing, where with the Beyma it is never fatiguing sounding (even though it measured very similiarly). After that, I went back to the Beyma CP755Ti + 18 sound XT1464 (moving the xo back to 1Khz and putting the HF eq back to what is best for that combo) and immediately it was much easier to listen to without the feeling of it pressing on you.
At this point, it is starting to look like the Radian and Iwata are somehow not a good match (I had a similar issue with the Beyma + 18 sound XT120...moving it to the Iwata was like AHHHH!). Perhaps the Radian + the XT120 at around 2.5Khz would work well if the exit angle matches that horn better. Maybe I will get a JMLC horn like hORNs uses with Radians to see if that works better...maybe not. They are proving surprisingly analytical sounding despite the now more comfortable xo and measuring to demonstrate a good response that also shouldn't give a sharp impression (as I noted, there is a rolloff down a few db at the listening position).
For now, I am preferring the cheaper setup (driver and horn) as it is more robust, blends better with the main driver and simply sounds easy and free with great tone (especially now with the 300B amps on the horns).
Will keep experimenting, but the preference is definitely shaping up...
After putting the Beyma CP350TI/Iwata 600 up to 2Khz and getting very nice sound with that setup, I switched the drivers to the Radians, set them up at 2Khz and got out the measuring tools. Other than roll off starting above 5-6Khz, the response was very flat as measured (+- about 2db from 80-5000Hz.) With a mild boost at 10Khz to still have a small roll off but a bit more air (response down a few db at 20Khz) I settled in to listen. In some ways there is more information coming from the Radian in terms of "apparent" detail, it also seems noisier between the notes and the feeling of flatness did not disappear completely. I found it again after a while to be fatiguing, where with the Beyma it is never fatiguing sounding (even though it measured very similiarly). After that, I went back to the Beyma CP755Ti + 18 sound XT1464 (moving the xo back to 1Khz and putting the HF eq back to what is best for that combo) and immediately it was much easier to listen to without the feeling of it pressing on you.
At this point, it is starting to look like the Radian and Iwata are somehow not a good match (I had a similar issue with the Beyma + 18 sound XT120...moving it to the Iwata was like AHHHH!). Perhaps the Radian + the XT120 at around 2.5Khz would work well if the exit angle matches that horn better. Maybe I will get a JMLC horn like hORNs uses with Radians to see if that works better...maybe not. They are proving surprisingly analytical sounding despite the now more comfortable xo and measuring to demonstrate a good response that also shouldn't give a sharp impression (as I noted, there is a rolloff down a few db at the listening position).
For now, I am preferring the cheaper setup (driver and horn) as it is more robust, blends better with the main driver and simply sounds easy and free with great tone (especially now with the 300B amps on the horns).
Will keep experimenting, but the preference is definitely shaping up...