First Watt SIT-4 unbelievable!!!
- Thread starter silverfoxvtx1800
- Start date
Hi All
My first post on the WB Forum.
I have just purchased a First Watt SIT 4 to replace my Melody Dark Star 300B-1 monoblocks. My experience sounds similar to silverfoxvtx1880.
I have used valve (tube) amplification for over 40 years. I started with a home built 60W (4 x EL34) pair of monoblocks which lasted very well for nearly 37 years (new valves occasionally, of course).
I then purchased a pair of Cube Audio Nenuphar Mini V1 three years ago and I thought it was about time to have a change in amplification. I was contemplating buying the First Watt SIT 3 but decided to stay in the valve (tube) world and, of course, a low powered, triode mode amp was the obvious choice.
I chose the Melody based on hifi website reviews and was initially satisfied with its performance with an improvement over the EL34 amps into the Nenuphars. After about four weeks, I started to hear an intermittent "crackling" sound from one channel. I sent the faulty amp back to the retailer (in another state) and had a total sh*t fight with the courier company. They "lost it" for over four weeks!
The retailer wanted me to upgrade to a more powerful Melody amp (+ $1,000) rather than getting mine repaired. I suspected a transformer problem and I also suspect spare parts supply was the problem. I told them I wanted my amp repaired. Eventually I got it back, and I started tube rolling (+$2,000) with some expensive NOS tubes. Sound improved significantly over the stock tubes.
Last week, I turned it on and one of the amps started to hum loudly. I turned it off within seconds and noticed that the Mullard ($$$) inverter tube was dead. The aluminium cover over the power transformer was hot and the air filled with the smell of burnt insulation. Fortunately, the speaker was not damaged. I am not sure if I would have been that lucky if it had been the output transformer. The moral of the story - don't buy amplifiers with inferior transformer/s.
Anyway, that is the bad news out of the way.
I had my iPad on Radio Paradise Mellow Mix playing through my Auralic Aries G2 and Vega G2 DAC when I first turned on the power to the SIT 4. Suddenly, Neil Young was (almost) in my listening room !! Cold amp with virtually (short testing at First watt) no run in time. By the way, the passive volume control in the Vega G2 works perfectly with the First Watt SIT 4.
I have been playing tracks/albums that I am extremely familiar with and it is a revelation. Surprisingly, older albums (e.g. The Beatles 'Abbey Road') sounds totally different = better. More detailed, NO much more detailed but the biggest difference is the soundstage improvement. I can now clearly hear the effects of the recording room. On the track "Good Morning Little School Girl" on Muddy Waters "Folk Singer" (TP4 Music version) I can clearly hear the ambience of the recording studio on this track.
If you are a subscriber to Qobuz (or even have the album), have a listen to the track '0191' on the album Third Page:Resonance by Sun-Mi Hong. One reviewer described the SIT 4 as an "immersive" experience. After listening to that track, I totally agree with him.
When I bought the First Watt SIT 4, I was just hoping for the reliability that comes with solid state that you do not get with glass and filaments. I was even prepared to take a slight dip in audio quality for the trade off, BUT NO !! I am getting both in spades. I am assuming, of course, that Nelson Pass has selected the best components to withstand the heat generated by 10 watts of class A amplification. I did read the entire Users Manual and I have plenty of natural ventilation to help with heat dissipation.
Sorry for the long posting !!
Semiquaver
Last edited:
Hello to all, I have Tannoy Canterbury GR speakers. So far I tryed Pass Int60, Radford STA 25, Primaluna EVO 300, Otomon, ASR, Accuphase E800.
The best for me was Radford STA 25 with AGI 511 preamp. Do you think that First Watt SIT4 can drive Canterbury GR? I have no chance for demo listening. And what preamp with phono and remote can you recommend? Room is 47m2 and I mostly listen to jazz, vocals and instrumental music.
Thank you in advance.
Have a good day!
The best for me was Radford STA 25 with AGI 511 preamp. Do you think that First Watt SIT4 can drive Canterbury GR? I have no chance for demo listening. And what preamp with phono and remote can you recommend? Room is 47m2 and I mostly listen to jazz, vocals and instrumental music.
Thank you in advance.
Have a good day!
Attachments
Hi Mostec
The First Watt SIT 4 produces 10 watts per channel into 8ohms.
My Cube Audio Nenuphar Mini speakers have an efficiency of 91 db compared to your Tannoy Canterbury GR speakers which are 96 db efficient.
My listening room is 45 m2 and the SIT 4 has no problem filling the room at a mid level volume setting on my Auralic Vega G2 analogue volume control. I do not think you will have any problems with power.
My Cube Audio Nenuphar's and the SIT 4 are a combination 'Made in Heaven' due to the very low damping factor of the SIT 4 (DF = 2) meshing well with the very powerful neodynium magnets of the Nenuphar's drivers. These drivers do not want an ampifier with a high damping factor as there is too much contol especially with the bass when paired with an amplifier with a high damping factor.
Not sure about the Tannoy's in terms of preferred Damping Factor.
I did find an intersting discussion on this very website, which you may have already read, but just in case . . . . . .
Which tube ampli for Tannoy Canterbury Se
Tannoy Prestige Gold Reference Canterbury Speakers Recommended amplifier power 20 - 300 Watts Continuous power handling 150 Watts RMS Peak power handling 600 watt Sensitivity 96 dB (2.83 volt @ 1 m) 17 more rows ... Feb 25 2021 Brand: Tannoy Nominal impedance 8 ohms...
www.whatsbestforum.com
The best advice that I read on this blog is to borrow the amp and listen for yourself. Great advice if you can organise a home demo or even in a store which sells both (good luck with that option !!).
I bought mine unheard after the glowing review on 6Moons and on HiFiKnight but in your (any & all) case, it is important for the speakers to work with the amp's characteristics.
As far as audio quality is concerned, if I could possibly summarise Srajan Ebaen (
) this amplifier sounds like a "high definition" version of a 300B SET amp. I have to agree that that is a very accurate description.I cannot help you with a recommendation with a suitable preamp as my preamp is built into my Auralic Vega G2.
Best regards,
Gary
Gary, thank you for your reply.Hi Mostec
The First Watt SIT 4 produces 10 watts per channel into 8ohms.
My Cube Audio Nenuphar Mini speakers have an efficiency of 91 db compared to your Tannoy Canterbury GR speakers which are 96 db efficient.
My listening room is 45 m2 and the SIT 4 has no problem filling the room at a mid level volume setting on my Auralic Vega G2 analogue volume control. I do not think you will have any problems with power.
My Cube Audio Nenuphar's and the SIT 4 are a combination 'Made in Heaven' due to the very low damping factor of the SIT 4 (DF = 2) meshing well with the very powerful neodynium magnets of the Nenuphar's drivers. These drivers do not want an ampifier with a high damping factor as there is too much contol especially with the bass when paired with an amplifier with a high damping factor.
Not sure about the Tannoy's in terms of preferred Damping Factor.
I did find an intersting discussion on this very website, which you may have already read, but just in case . . . . . .
Which tube ampli for Tannoy Canterbury Se
Tannoy Prestige Gold Reference Canterbury Speakers Recommended amplifier power 20 - 300 Watts Continuous power handling 150 Watts RMS Peak power handling 600 watt Sensitivity 96 dB (2.83 volt @ 1 m) 17 more rows ... Feb 25 2021 Brand: Tannoy Nominal impedance 8 ohms...
The best advice that I read on this blog is to borrow the amp and listen for yourself. Great advice if you can organise a home demo or even in a store which sells both (good luck with that option !!).
I bought mine unheard after the glowing review on 6Moons and on HiFiKnight but in your (any & all) case, it is important for the speakers to work with the amp's characteristics.
As far as audio quality is concerned, if I could possibly summarise Srajan Ebaen (
I cannot help you with a recommendation with a suitable preamp as my preamp is built into my Auralic Vega G2.
Best regards,
Gary
I’ve had a SIT3 for about seven years. I’ve loved it. I have Nenuphars with the V2 update. I think the Nenuphars sounded better with the SIT3 in their original spec. There was a beauty and delicacy that was really special. After the V2 update some of that was gone. The speaker sounded more substantial, weightier. Less pretty. Srajan said in the V2 review that amps may need to be rethought.
Being a FirstWatt guy I’ve followed the SIT evolution since the beginning. Everything I’ve read about the SIT4 has said to me that this is the right choice. I seriously considered GM70 monos from J. Jackson but we live in San Antonio and it was over 100 degrees today. I can’t live with hundreds of watts of heat output.
I contacted my dealer and told him I want to purchase the SIT4. He thought I might like the SIT5 better but there is buzz that the lower damping factor of the SIT4 fits the Cube speakers better. He sent me his personal SIT4 to audition to help me decide. It arrived about 7 hrs ago. I’m listening with The Truth buffered but no gain pre. The Nenuphar with the SIT4 are a whole different experience. It is not a sideways move in any way, shape, or form. These speakers now sound as good or better than anything I have ever heard except the MBL Extremes.
I put on Nanci Griffith Other Voices Other Rooms when I bring in new kit because it’s full of subtleties and I know it so well. It was the first time in my life that I had the actual experience of a spooky real voice, a living person in the room. The holography of this amp is next level. It fills the space with sonic movement. As far as comparison to the beauty and delicacy of my original configuration, this is on a whole other level.
It’s like Herb Reichert wrote; “I revisited First Watt's SIT-4 power amplifier because long-term listening has shown it to be among the most unique amplification products I've ever encountered. The SIT-4 is a new, 25%-more-expensive First Watt amplifier that looks like an old, unfancy First Watt amplifier but sounds like a totally new type of amplifier, worth much more than its extra cost. In my system, the SIT-4 powered my Falcons with a benign authority that whispered, "Herb, this is what accuracy sounds like." I agreed.”
I will be purchasing a SIT4 directly. Now I need to figure out an analog front end that is worthy of it and that I can afford. I already bought a Holbo TT. Maybe the Haniwa cart and phono stage are the right choice. I think it’s worth an experiment!
Being a FirstWatt guy I’ve followed the SIT evolution since the beginning. Everything I’ve read about the SIT4 has said to me that this is the right choice. I seriously considered GM70 monos from J. Jackson but we live in San Antonio and it was over 100 degrees today. I can’t live with hundreds of watts of heat output.
I contacted my dealer and told him I want to purchase the SIT4. He thought I might like the SIT5 better but there is buzz that the lower damping factor of the SIT4 fits the Cube speakers better. He sent me his personal SIT4 to audition to help me decide. It arrived about 7 hrs ago. I’m listening with The Truth buffered but no gain pre. The Nenuphar with the SIT4 are a whole different experience. It is not a sideways move in any way, shape, or form. These speakers now sound as good or better than anything I have ever heard except the MBL Extremes.
I put on Nanci Griffith Other Voices Other Rooms when I bring in new kit because it’s full of subtleties and I know it so well. It was the first time in my life that I had the actual experience of a spooky real voice, a living person in the room. The holography of this amp is next level. It fills the space with sonic movement. As far as comparison to the beauty and delicacy of my original configuration, this is on a whole other level.
It’s like Herb Reichert wrote; “I revisited First Watt's SIT-4 power amplifier because long-term listening has shown it to be among the most unique amplification products I've ever encountered. The SIT-4 is a new, 25%-more-expensive First Watt amplifier that looks like an old, unfancy First Watt amplifier but sounds like a totally new type of amplifier, worth much more than its extra cost. In my system, the SIT-4 powered my Falcons with a benign authority that whispered, "Herb, this is what accuracy sounds like." I agreed.”
I will be purchasing a SIT4 directly. Now I need to figure out an analog front end that is worthy of it and that I can afford. I already bought a Holbo TT. Maybe the Haniwa cart and phono stage are the right choice. I think it’s worth an experiment!
Last edited:
The SIT3 has 18W into 8 ohms but just 11db of gain.
It did not work well with a passive pre.
The SIT 4 may have just 10 watts but it has 20db of gain.
It works very well with the passive preamp. With the MZ3 it ran 15-20db lower on the attenuator for similar volume levels. I know, duh….but it was an interesting experience to keep turning it down.
It did not work well with a passive pre.
The SIT 4 may have just 10 watts but it has 20db of gain.
It works very well with the passive preamp. With the MZ3 it ran 15-20db lower on the attenuator for similar volume levels. I know, duh….but it was an interesting experience to keep turning it down.
Thanks to @Semiquavergarydesmondschu and @MRubey for transcribing their experience!
I have had the SIT4 for two weeks now, but haven't been able to give it a proper listen through my Nenuphars, as at about the same time I traded my old DAC in and my new one won't be arriving until Monday.
I did some serious system re-arranging to accommodate the SIT4, but your positive experience gives me high hopes it'll all be worth it.
I have had the SIT4 for two weeks now, but haven't been able to give it a proper listen through my Nenuphars, as at about the same time I traded my old DAC in and my new one won't be arriving until Monday.
I did some serious system re-arranging to accommodate the SIT4, but your positive experience gives me high hopes it'll all be worth it.
I’ve had the SIT4 in my system for six days now. It does all the things we’ve written. It’s the most holographic amp that I’ve ever had in my home. I used to have a 2A3 SET. It was second to the SIT4. It is also the most colorful amp I’ve had. I equate sonic color with tonal saturation and vividness. It does that in spades. But it does something more that to me is at the heart of its magic. It projects presence. It projects presence to the point that it messes with my perception. Pretty amazing property for an electrical device to possess. I don’t know if the amp just does that or if it’s got to do with its synergy with the Nenuphars. It’s one of those things where you have to be receptive, open to it. I use no substances. Audio induced synesthesia. Fascinating.
Several weeks ago I ordered my SIT4. The dealer (Refined Audio) was kind enough to send his personal unit until mine arrived. I just got mine a few days ago and I sent his back home. When I sent him him tracking info with a heartfelt thank you he wrote back letting me know that his SIT4, the unit I had here for a couple of months was the first one built preproduction. Nelson had sent it to him to test and report on and he got to keep it. Man, I really wish I’d known that when it was here!
Everything I wrote above pertains to that amplifier.
My new one is still settling in but it sounds unreal. Especially with my new front end (see sig).
Everything I wrote above pertains to that amplifier.
My new one is still settling in but it sounds unreal. Especially with my new front end (see sig).
Semiquaver, We definitely went through the same experience and finally finding our way to the First Watt Sit-4. I bought the Sit-4 from Jon at Refined audio and all my Pass gear from him so lucky to have him in my corner.. and it’s been a year now and I love the Sit-4 so much with my Volti Audio speakers. I will have this amp until I die at 72 I am sure it will out last me. Can you describe the sound of the Cube speakers, I am very curious…I use the Pass XP-12 preamp with it, a perfect match…Hi All
My first post on the WB Forum.
I have just purchased a First Watt SIT 4 to replace my Melody Dark Star 300B-1 monoblocks. My experience sounds similar to silverfoxvtx1880.
I have used valve (tube) amplification for over 40 years. I started with a home built 60W (4 x EL34) pair of monoblocks which lasted very well for nearly 37 years (new valves occasionally, of course).
I then purchased a pair of Cube Audio Nenuphar Mini V1 three years ago and I thought it was about time to have a change in amplification. I was contemplating buying the First Watt SIT 3 but decided to stay in the valve (tube) world and, of course, a low powered, triode mode amp was the obvious choice.
I chose the Melody based on hifi website reviews and was initially satisfied with its performance with an improvement over the EL34 amps into the Nenuphars. After about four weeks, I started to hear an intermittent "crackling" sound from one channel. I sent the faulty amp back to the retailer (in another state) and had a total sh*t fight with the courier company. They "lost it" for over four weeks!
The retailer wanted me to upgrade to a more powerful Melody amp (+ $1,000) rather than getting mine repaired. I suspected a transformer problem and I also suspect spare parts supply was the problem. I told them I wanted my amp repaired. Eventually I got it back, and I started tube rolling (+$2,000) with some expensive NOS tubes. Sound improved significantly over the stock tubes.
Last week, I turned it on and one of the amps started to hum loudly. I turned it off within seconds and noticed that the Mullard ($$$) inverter tube was dead. The aluminium cover over the power transformer was hot and the air filled with the smell of burnt insulation. Fortunately, the speaker was not damaged. I am not sure if I would have been that lucky if it had been the output transformer. The moral of the story - don't buy amplifiers with inferior transformer/s.
Anyway, that is the bad news out of the way.
I had my iPad on Radio Paradise Mellow Mix playing through my Auralic Aries G2 and Vega G2 DAC when I first turned on the power to the SIT 4. Suddenly, Neil Young was (almost) in my listening room !! Cold amp with virtually (short testing at First watt) no run in time. By the way, the passive volume control in the Vega G2 works perfectly with the First Watt SIT 4.
I have been playing tracks/albums that I am extremely familiar with and it is a revelation. Surprisingly, older albums (e.g. The Beatles 'Abbey Road') sounds totally different = better. More detailed, NO much more detailed but the biggest difference is the soundstage improvement. I can now clearly hear the effects of the recording room. On the track "Good Morning Little School Girl" on Muddy Waters "Folk Singer" (TP4 Music version) I can clearly hear the ambience of the recording studio on this track.
If you are a subscriber to Qobuz (or even have the album), have a listen to the track '0191' on the album Third Page:Resonance by Sun-Mi Hong. One reviewer described the SIT 4 as an "immersive" experience. After listening to that track, I totally agree with him.
When I bought the First Watt SIT 4, I was just hoping for the reliability that comes with solid state that you do not get with glass and filaments. I was even prepared to take a slight dip in audio quality for the trade off, BUT NO !! I am getting both in spades. I am assuming, of course, that Nelson Pass has selected the best components to withstand the heat generated by 10 watts of class A amplification. I did read the entire Users Manual and I have plenty of natural ventilation to help with heat dissipation.
Sorry for the long posting !!
Semiquaver
My system is analog only. I was using a Sutherland 20-20 phonostage. I now have the Haniwa transimpedance system. With the Sutherland my Linear Tube Audio MZ3 was a superlative preamp. Their new Preamp 3 is a great match for the SIT4. The Haniwa is a state of the art level of revealing cartridge and phonostage. The LTA actually veils it a bit. I am currently using a “The Truth” passive pre which allows the Haniwa to show off its strengths. I am looking to buy a transformer based silver passive, EM/IA Elmaformer or Bespoke Audio Company. The SIT 4 has plenty of gain for a passive. The SIT amps are ultimately transparent. They will do justice to any level of upstream components.
Hi silverfoxvtx1800,
I have not had the First Watt Sit 4 in my system for two months now.
My initial excitement for the amp was interrupted by my SIT4 developing a (faint) noise from one channel after only 12 hours of use. I returned it to the distributor who replicated the problem and they said they would (attempt) to repair it. After two weeks, it arrived with the fault description being "a couple of dry solder joints"
. It lasted all of six hours of use before the noise started back again this time MUCH louder and I ran to turn it off before it did any damage to my speaker.After my experience wit the blown power transformer in my Melody 300B, the last thing I needed in my system was another faulting amplifier !!
I believe that the distributor will return this unit to the First Watt factory for its electronic "post mortem".
I am now waiting for the next batch of SIT4 to be sent out to distributors and I see that that they are now available to retailers in the US.
I will try to answer your question about the differences between Volti Audio speakers and Cube Audio Nenuphars speakers. I think that these are both very highly regarded speakers. I was fortunate to get a home demo of my Nenuphar Mini speakers for two weeks before I bought them.
The ONLY way to get an accurate answer to your question is to "beg, borrow or steal" a pair of the Cube Audio Nenuphar speakers and A/B them with your existing front end and with the SIT 4 and your current Volti Audio speakers. Room acoustics, ampilfier/speaker synergy and personal preference are variables that that only be evalualted (by you) with a comprehensive listening test. I appreciate that this is not always possible and we sometimes are forced to accept the opinions of professional reviewers.
Just a note on my initial impressions of the Cube Audio Nenuphars vs my previous Sonus Faber Grand Pianos. At first, I tought the Cubes were too much up front and bright. I now believe it was my brain adjusting to a new (much better) sound.
I do not know if the First Watt SIT 4 into a pair of Cube Audio Nenuphar speakers are the best combination that i can find or afford. I do not care as I cannot fault this combination. It has bass. It has top end and a midrange to die for.
There is an old saying in the hifi world " yes, your system sounds very realistic (= high fidelity) but no sound reproduction system can compete with live music". I still believe this, but this combination is my end game and I will now (very soon, I hope) spend my time listening to music rathering than "wondering if".
p.s. I certainly hope that you out live the amplifier and that your prophecy that "I will have this amp until I die at 72" is only a syntax error and not a reflection on your current health !!
Gary
Last edited:
Hi silverfoxvtx1800,
I have not had the First Watt Sit 4 in my system for two months now.
My initial excitement for the amp was interrupted by my SIT4 developing a (faint) noise from one channel after only 12 hours of use. I returned it to the distributor who replicated the problem and they said they would (attempt) to repair it. After two weeks, it arrived with the fault description being "a couple of dry solder joints"
After my experience wit the blown power transformer in my Melody 300B, the last thing I needed in my system was another faulting amplifier !!
I believe that the distributor will return this unit to the First Watt factory for its electronic "post mortem".
I am now waiting for the next batch of SIT4 to be sent out to distributors and I see that that they are now available to retailers in the US.
I will try to answer your question about the differences between Volti Audio speakers and Cube Audio Nenuphars speakers. I think that these are both very highly regarded speakers. I was fortunate to get a home demo of my Nenuphar Mini speakers for two weeks before I bought them.
The ONLY way to get an accurate answer to your question is to "beg, borrow or steal" a pair of the Cube Audio Nenuphar speakers and A/B them with your existing front end and with the SIT 4 and your current Volti Audio speakers. Room acoustics, ampilfier/speaker synergy and personal preference are variables that that only be evalualted (by you) with a comprehensive listening test. I appreciate that this is not always possible and we sometimes are forced to accept the opinions of professional reviewers.
Just a note on my initial impressions of the Cube Audio Nenuphars vs my previous Sonus Faber Grand Pianos. At first, I tought the Cubes were too much up front and bright. I now believe it was my brain adjusting to a new (much better) sound.
I do not know if the First Watt SIT 4 into a pair of Cube Audio Nenuphar speakers are the best combination that i can find or afford. I do not care as I cannot fault this combination. It has bass. It has top end and a midrange to die for.
There is an old saying in the hifi world " yes, your system sounds very realistic (= high fidelity) but no sound reproduction system can compete with live music". I still believe this, but this combination is my end game and I will now (very soon, I hope) spend my time listening to music rathering than "wondering if".
p.s. I certainly hope that you out live the amplifier and that your prophecy that "I will have this amp until I die at 72" is only a syntax error and not a reflection on your cuurent health !!
Gary
Dang sorry to hear about the problems you had with the Sit-4, I have taken for granite how good my old Yamaha receivers have been over the years, they have never caused problems and end up in the garage. My Yamaha A/V has been on every day all day for years and still keeps going. I hate it when someone has problems..
I have had Nenuphars since 2018. They received the v2 upgrade last year. I had a SIT3 for several years and now have the SIT4. You may already know what I am about to write but maybe someone will find it helpful.Hi silverfoxvtx1800,
I have not had the First Watt Sit 4 in my system for two months now.
My initial excitement for the amp was interrupted by my SIT4 developing a (faint) noise from one channel after only 12 hours of use. I returned it to the distributor who replicated the problem and they said they would (attempt) to repair it. After two weeks, it arrived with the fault description being "a couple of dry solder joints"
After my experience wit the blown power transformer in my Melody 300B, the last thing I needed in my system was another faulting amplifier !!
I believe that the distributor will return this unit to the First Watt factory for its electronic "post mortem".
I am now waiting for the next batch of SIT4 to be sent out to distributors and I see that that they are now available to retailers in the US.
I will try to answer your question about the differences between Volti Audio speakers and Cube Audio Nenuphars speakers. I think that these are both very highly regarded speakers. I was fortunate to get a home demo of my Nenuphar Mini speakers for two weeks before I bought them.
The ONLY way to get an accurate answer to your question is to "beg, borrow or steal" a pair of the Cube Audio Nenuphar speakers and A/B them with your existing front end and with the SIT 4 and your current Volti Audio speakers. Room acoustics, ampilfier/speaker synergy and personal preference are variables that that only be evalualted (by you) with a comprehensive listening test. I appreciate that this is not always possible and we sometimes are forced to accept the opinions of professional reviewers.
Just a note on my initial impressions of the Cube Audio Nenuphars vs my previous Sonus Faber Grand Pianos. At first, I tought the Cubes were too much up front and bright. I now believe it was my brain adjusting to a new (much better) sound.
I do not know if the First Watt SIT 4 into a pair of Cube Audio Nenuphar speakers are the best combination that i can find or afford. I do not care as I cannot fault this combination. It has bass. It has top end and a midrange to die for.
There is an old saying in the hifi world " yes, your system sounds very realistic (= high fidelity) but no sound reproduction system can compete with live music". I still believe this, but this combination is my end game and I will now (very soon, I hope) spend my time listening to music rathering than "wondering if".
p.s. I certainly hope that you out live the amplifier and that your prophecy that "I will have this amp until I die at 72" is only a syntax error and not a reflection on your cuurent health !!
Gary
I find that the most significant aspect of speaker placement with the Nenuphar is toe in.
Cube recommends 5-10 degrees. These speakers sound correct a bit off axis. I had RETHM single driver speakers prior to the Nenuphar and it’s the same situation. They sounded best straight on. Any toe in at all was too bright. I toe in the Nenuphar just shy of where they begin to sound too bright. There is a sweet spot where the presence, soundstage and timbre come together perfectly. Mine are 7.5’ apart center to center, 58” from the front wall, about 30” from side walls. All of these parameters but especially toe in adjusted by ear. Good luck!
Hi MRubey
My Cube Audio Nenuphar Mini V1speakers are also 7.5 feet centre to centre and the distance from the front of the speaker to my ears is 10 feet.
Without getting my protractor out to measure, mine are toe'd in about 20 degrees. When I look at the both speakers from the centred sweet spot, I cannot see the sides of either speaker. I can only see the front baffle. Having thick woollen carpet and the spikes on the speakers make micro adjustment difficult. I remember a hifi friend who helped me set them up was fanatical about the speakers' placement and toe-in especially. After about an hour a trial and error, we both agreed on their current position.
When we initially tried the speakers facing straight ahead we were both less than impressed with the soundstage. After the hour of trial and error, I was a convert on the importance of speaker toe-in.
Anyway, back to listening to Radio Paradise Mellow Mix and Qobuz through my Sony 65A80J oled tv for now.
Hopefully, I will get my replacement Sit-4 in two weeks time.Gary
Hi Gary,Hi MRubey
My Cube Audio Nenuphar Mini V1speakers are also 7.5 feet centre to centre and the distance from the front of the speaker to my ears is 10 feet.
Without getting my protractor out to measure, mine are toe'd in about 20 degrees. When I look at the both speakers from the centred sweet spot, I cannot see the sides of either speaker. I can only see the front baffle. Having thick woollen carpet and the spikes on the speakers make micro adjustment difficult. I remember a hifi friend who helped me set them up was fanatical about the speakers' placement and toe-in especially. After about an hour a trial and error, we both agreed on their current position.
When we initially tried the speakers facing straight ahead we were both less than impressed with the soundstage. After the hour of trial and error, I was a convert on the importance of speaker toe-in.
Anyway, back to listening to Radio Paradise Mellow Mix and Qobuz through my Sony 65A80J oled tv for now.
Gary
That much toe in would definitely sound very bright on mine. But different strokes for different folks as they say.
Cheers
Similar threads
 | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator |  | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator |  | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |