Congrats.Hey guys, my Poseidon arrived on Monday and is burning in with amazing results. I’ll share some pics soon and describe what I’m hearing. It has exceeded my already very high expectations.
What DAC does the Pseidon replace?
Congrats.Hey guys, my Poseidon arrived on Monday and is burning in with amazing results. I’ll share some pics soon and describe what I’m hearing. It has exceeded my already very high expectations.
Approximately 5 weeks ago.Out of interest, how long ago did you place the order?
MSB premier.Congrats.
What DAC does the Pseidon replace?
I love the Posidean and recommend it often and use it at shows. Will you be using it as a pre-amplifier as well? It's excellent in that dual role.
Interesting and the exact opposite of what I’ve experienced with many dacs including three r2rs in my system. I have never had a better soundstage than right now, and my focal maestros feel like dead blocks of furniture. The soundstage is so wide and deep. I auditioned the Ideon absolute meta too. That’s an amazing dac too, however goes about the presentation differently.I demoed the Poseidon last week against my Aqua Formula as I was curious to hear what improvement I’d get for an outlay of £20K. Well, I was honestly disappointed. It wasn’t bad as such but after tube rolling, don’t ask me what was tried, it was more forward than the Aqua with great tonal properties but going back to the Aqua was like settling into a comfy sofa.
The Aqua has bigger soundstage, sounds more organic and the music is free from the speakers whereas the Poseidon never really lets go. Could this be the difference between R2R and a chip solution ?
So, that scuppered my plans to buy a Poseidon, saved me a significant amount of cash I could potentially put towards a Taiko Olympus.
FWIW, the Poseidon was direct to the tube amps, the Aqua via Khozmo vc. If I had more time I would have tried the Poseidon through the Khozmo. And, that’s the second Lampi dac I’ve tried, an old GG was too noisy on the Duos.
Almost certainly (but not conclusively) what you're hearing was the result of not playing it through the preamp. That collapse of soundstage is precisely what I would have predicted would be any potential downside to removing a good preamp.I demoed the Poseidon last week against my Aqua Formula as I was curious to hear what improvement I’d get for an outlay of £20K. Well, I was honestly disappointed. It wasn’t bad as such but after tube rolling, don’t ask me what was tried, it was more forward than the Aqua with great tonal properties but going back to the Aqua was like settling into a comfy sofa.
The Aqua has bigger soundstage, sounds more organic and the music is free from the speakers whereas the Poseidon never really lets go. Could this be the difference between R2R and a chip solution ?
So, that scuppered my plans to buy a Poseidon, saved me a significant amount of cash I could potentially put towards a Taiko Olympus.
FWIW, the Poseidon was direct to the tube amps, the Aqua via Khozmo vc. If I had more time I would have tried the Poseidon through the Khozmo. And, that’s the second Lampi dac I’ve tried, an old GG was too noisy on the Duos.
Agree 110% Golum and b345t, something is off if that was the result. That said, the Aqua is a very nice DAC and you may have simply preferred it tonally. No mention of your amplifiers or whether they are single-ended or balanced? TInteresting and the exact opposite of what I’ve experienced with many dacs including three r2rs in my system. I have never had a better soundstage than right now, and my focal maestros feel like dead blocks of furniture. The soundstage is so wide and deep. I auditioned the Ideon absolute meta too. That’s an amazing dac too, however goes about the presentation differently.
I have the Poseidon into the Westminster REIs into Von Schweikert VR9SE Mk2s with the Westminster Ultra XLR IC from preamp to amp. When I play minimally or no added reverb piano recordings, the piano sounds as if it were in front of me, live. In my smaller custom built room 20X15X10, if a recording has a wide stage, it is wall to wall sound. The Poseidon pre-amp is with the standard OEM tubes, excellent. I play LPs through an EAR 324 phono pre-amp into the Poseidon and again, phenomenal, only bettered if I had a higher resolution, lower noise cartridge & TT . The other important factor for me is the body and warmth of the sound using the Poseidon which replaces older EAR 912/864 pre-amps and an excellent custom subminiature tube pre amp with MM phono & Zesto Allesso SUT.Agree 110% Golum and b345t, something is off if that was the result. That said, the Aqua is a very nice DAC and you may have simply preferred it tonally. No mention of your amplifiers or whether they are single-ended or balanced? T
The Posidean has an excellent pre-amplifier on board, not to mention superp DAC which leads me to suspect something else is causing you to say it fell short of the Aqua. My own and other experience running the Posidean directly into the WestminsterLab Class A balanced monos is nothing short of excellent, so a separate pre should not be required. Thanks for reporting your findings though. Worthy of further investigation.
The Poseidon uses tubes from the ECC88 "family". ECC83s are not pin compatible with ECC88s. I suppose you could always use adapters, but in this case the gain of the ECC83 tubes is much higher and there is a strong possibility they will be overdriving the next stage up.Useful knowledge for input tubes on the Poseidon. Langrex have a substantial number of these Russian Voskhod ECC83 tubes, matched and balanced. Just installed a pair (I'm running single ended so only using 2x2 in the input and output stages), and there are notable improvements to bass weight, imaging and sound stage:
Langrex Voskhod ECC83
My mistake (which I've now corrected in edit); I did mean ECC88 and the link is to ECC88 tubes.The Poseidon uses tubes from the ECC88 "family". ECC83s are not pin compatible with ECC88s. I suppose you could always use adapters, but in this case the gain of the ECC83 tubes is much higher and there is a strong possibility they will be overdriving the next stage up.
So, would a Mullard 6DJ8 or Amperex Bugle Boy 6DJ8 (same as 6922 and ECC88) sound as good or just different? I have a dozen of the latter.My mistake (which I've now corrected in edit); I did mean ECC88 and the link is to ECC88 tubes.