KeithR's "Dream Speaker" Search
- Thread starter KeithR
- Start date
Keith after you return the pass some amps to consider:
1. Coda no 16: http://v2.stereotimes.com/post/coda-technologies-16.0-amplifier-by-terry-london/
https://destinationhifi.com/collect...no-16-stereo-amplifier?variant=33205127741580
Destination hifi really cool dudes and they do free in home demos.
2. M900u
3. Boulder 2060 used or 2160
4. Gryphon colosseum (there is one on audiogon now) or if you can swing it mephisto stereo.
1. Coda no 16: http://v2.stereotimes.com/post/coda-technologies-16.0-amplifier-by-terry-london/
https://destinationhifi.com/collect...no-16-stereo-amplifier?variant=33205127741580
Destination hifi really cool dudes and they do free in home demos.
2. M900u
3. Boulder 2060 used or 2160
4. Gryphon colosseum (there is one on audiogon now) or if you can swing it mephisto stereo.
Tricky buying monster amps with no chance to audition first.
Ya whenver possible get an audition first. Colosseum is safe because if he doesn't like it (which is unlikely) he could likely sell easily and not lose much. But the coda would be a free demo.
This is a good point. I know someone who right now is looking to buy used Mephisto Solos or a Mephisto Stereo.
I think that it is relatively easy to find buyers of used Gryphon amplifiers.
Yup so many people love and respect gryphon. They are truly beautiful amps. I think the stereo will sound great and fit between the two haileys as a third tall vertical column perfectly. The seller should accept $25k, its a fair offer.
Crazy to think that at one point someone was selling mephisto solos for $47k on audiogon.
And reselling monster stereo amps for $25k not easy. Most want monos at that level.
I’m not in that league so nothing to worry about
Pass X350.8:
Background on trying this amp was that I wanted to complete the "musical SS" trio of Pass, Rowland, and Luxman. I've always had profound respect for Nelson and in my Zu tenure, tried SIT amps which sounded very, very good. In fact, if I ever go back to Zu a XA25 would be my first amp decision (and Sean Casey's favorite amp right now).
I considered the X and XA.8 series, but thought the latter would overheat my room and at the power I require, be too expensive ($30k+). Also, I've noted several contrarians on the XA.8 series who actually feel the X is better. So I narrowed the Pass decision down to the 260.8 monos and the 350.8. I had read on another forum a member having trouble with the monos on 88db speakers, so I ultimately thought the 350.8 was the best amp to try. YG speakers seem to love power, so why not. I learned later on that the 260.8 is the "jazz" voicing while the 350.8 was the "rock" one - as I listen more to rock that seemed to be the route. Also, for those looking at the XA series - the 100.8 sounds "rock" vs the rest of the series.
I turned the amp on for 5 days, with only a short session at 35 hours that wasn't successful. After 5 days, I really started to examine the amp/speaker relationship. We tried multiple preamps (tube and SS MF) and cables (XLR and RCA). We settled on the LTA tube preamp with single ended cables (it doesn't have balanced outs). Overall the Pass was disappointing and, honestly, didn't get better over the two weeks I had it running in. The amp had a real "stilted" presentation that seemed to slam the leading edge with no decay - to the point it was harsh to my ears. Piano really didn't sound like a piano to me, no matter what I tried. Surprisingly though, the soundstage wasn't overly big either and I always felt the amp exhibited a flatness quality compared with other amps. This was codified in an overall thin timbre where most instruments and vocals lacked body. As one listener here commented, the female voice lacked the vocal chord pipe. I will say the amp isn't cold, was actually warmer than expected, and had a characteristic to the bass I really enjoyed. It hits hard, but with a bit of roundness that I prefer.
One last comment - this amp runs quite warm. Huge heat sinks just emanate heat into the room similarly to Luxman Class A in my experience. It was just on the cusp of being uncomfortable in my 24'x16' room in a hot climate. All-in-all, the Pass X.8 just wasn't synergistic with the YGs and I feel Nelson's best work remains in the lower-powered spectrum.
Background on trying this amp was that I wanted to complete the "musical SS" trio of Pass, Rowland, and Luxman. I've always had profound respect for Nelson and in my Zu tenure, tried SIT amps which sounded very, very good. In fact, if I ever go back to Zu a XA25 would be my first amp decision (and Sean Casey's favorite amp right now).
I considered the X and XA.8 series, but thought the latter would overheat my room and at the power I require, be too expensive ($30k+). Also, I've noted several contrarians on the XA.8 series who actually feel the X is better. So I narrowed the Pass decision down to the 260.8 monos and the 350.8. I had read on another forum a member having trouble with the monos on 88db speakers, so I ultimately thought the 350.8 was the best amp to try. YG speakers seem to love power, so why not. I learned later on that the 260.8 is the "jazz" voicing while the 350.8 was the "rock" one - as I listen more to rock that seemed to be the route. Also, for those looking at the XA series - the 100.8 sounds "rock" vs the rest of the series.
I turned the amp on for 5 days, with only a short session at 35 hours that wasn't successful. After 5 days, I really started to examine the amp/speaker relationship. We tried multiple preamps (tube and SS MF) and cables (XLR and RCA). We settled on the LTA tube preamp with single ended cables (it doesn't have balanced outs). Overall the Pass was disappointing and, honestly, didn't get better over the two weeks I had it running in. The amp had a real "stilted" presentation that seemed to slam the leading edge with no decay - to the point it was harsh to my ears. Piano really didn't sound like a piano to me, no matter what I tried. Surprisingly though, the soundstage wasn't overly big either and I always felt the amp exhibited a flatness quality compared with other amps. This was codified in an overall thin timbre where most instruments and vocals lacked body. As one listener here commented, the female voice lacked the vocal chord pipe. I will say the amp isn't cold, was actually warmer than expected, and had a characteristic to the bass I really enjoyed. It hits hard, but with a bit of roundness that I prefer.
One last comment - this amp runs quite warm. Huge heat sinks just emanate heat into the room similarly to Luxman Class A in my experience. It was just on the cusp of being uncomfortable in my 24'x16' room in a hot climate. All-in-all, the Pass X.8 just wasn't synergistic with the YGs and I feel Nelson's best work remains in the lower-powered spectrum.
I totally agree. My first question to Keith when he bought them was “what amps were on the speakers when you fell in love with them?”
I’ve made similar mistakes and I think we almost all have along the way.
Keith, I didn’t mean my above response to sound snarky. I apologize if that’s how you or anybody else took it.
I'd still vote for a used pair of MSB's, as well. Maybe not the final word in some things, but the pairing is pleasurable.
Yes the MSB 200 or 201 can be available cheap in the used market
I and a couple of my friends here have been consistently disappointed with Pass electronics. I haven’t heard any of the first watt stuff though.
I would buy a Boulder either 1060 or 2060.
Before that i would buy a pair of used halcro mono amps .
Depending on the impedance graph of the speaker if the latter would be a good match.
For tubes i d use convergent amps .
Probably Jl 3 or the new Jl 7 monos
pre amp in all cases CAT
Brg hj
Before that i would buy a pair of used halcro mono amps .
Depending on the impedance graph of the speaker if the latter would be a good match.
For tubes i d use convergent amps .
Probably Jl 3 or the new Jl 7 monos
pre amp in all cases CAT
Brg hj
Last edited:
Similar threads
