Thanks for the clear explanation. I will definitely give it a try and see if my Roon NUC endpoint needs the "handshake or not
LampizatOr Baltic 3
- Thread starter VoicesInMyHead
- Start date
Thanks for the clear explanation. I will definitely give it a try. I will see if my Roon NUC endpoint needs the "handshake or not
you should be fine, it's an old "Lampi trick" and I personally don't even remember the last time I had a USB cable with vbus connected to any of my Lampis. nice to have the clear instructions provided by @Sablon Audio here.
from my server to my Innuos PhoenixUSB the vbus is indeed needed though.
sold my former silver Baltic3, received yesterday the latest iteration, new circuit board, new caps, new digital board. According to Lampizator the new Baltic is even more closer to Horizon in sound DNA the before, but will take some more hours to burn in, as the new caps take their time. Fortunately my music server is new as well, so both units will play now ongoing for the next 10 days (with some switch on/off exercises), than I can enjoy the new set up.
(on the pics are the standard tubes, will change to better tubes after the burn in hours)
(on the pics are the standard tubes, will change to better tubes after the burn in hours)
Hey Baltic 3 owners! Just got some Rollerblocks (RBs) and wanted to get a recommendation from you on placement under the B3. The DAC seems heavier in the front--no?--so was thinking of two RBs there and one in the rear. Does anyone have an interior photo of the B3, as that might assist on RB placement. Thanks!
Why not try both options.
I'm sure you will probably hear immediately if one position is better than the other. If not, just place them where it is easier or better looking.
I would place one directly under the power transformer, and the other two where necessary to balance the chassis.
That's what I was thinking, and that's why I was wondering if anyone had a picture of the B3's interior to confirm exact location.
I could certainly experiment with different setups, as @christoph suggests, but maneuverability alongside my rack is a little tight, and so I'd like to start with a consensus pick first.
My guess from looking at these photos of an original Baltic and Amber, and having looked through the vent holes of my Baltic 3, is that the transformer is in a similar location near the front right of the chassis (when facing the DAC).
Right front. It’s wrapped in dark covering, but visible. I’d try an equilateral triangle placement assuming one is under the center of the transformer (or close). Then, experiment for best chassis balance.
Shakti, what differentiates the “new” B3 from the previous version? I received mine in August of this year, and I think it was a “newer” version. Have they made changes since? You listed some pretty significant upgrade components, so I’m curious which version I have. Thanks!
As an owner of the an Engine 53 version of the Baltic 3 DAC, I have to say it's very disappointing to be left on a deserted island considering Lampizator's policy of not upgrading earlier Baltic 3 DACs to the current version.
There are companies that offer updates to all their DACs as new developments become available, and therefore don't leave owners of older models behind. EMM Labs and Bricasti come to mind. I'm sure there are others.
you can find on their homepage:
ENGINE ELEVEN was released on Sept 01 2022
ENGINE ELEVEN is retrofit- compatible with all our older DACs as a complete installation package.
Due to time and labor constraints: we will accept requests for upgrades only for the following models: Big7, Golden Gate 1 & 2, Atlantic and Atlantioc2TRP, the queue will be without time guarantee (meaning long)
Pacific DAC is not subject to upgrades as the sound quality would be roughly the same.
Baltic DACs are too small chassis for retrofit upgrade, only new builds will have the ELEVEN from the beginning.
Buyers of pre-Engine 11 Baltic 3 DACs who purchased and took delivery before September 1, 2022 were notified they were receiving outdated, non-upgradeable, non trade-in-able DACs.
Right?
Too much time between the 2 DACs to compare, different Tubes, different music server as well...
Now I am listening to 4x L63 tubes instead of 2x 6SN7, which was a big difference to the different Psvane tubes I own.
Possibly the change to this tubes is a bigger change in Quality, than the change of digital engines
Thinking out loud but if using rca outputs then only one half of the dual triode is needed. The l63 / 6j5g is half of a 6sn7 - wouldn’t it work ok without the (doubtless lossy) adapter for rca cable users?
Similar threads
