Is it? I ask you to compare two versions of vanilla ice cream. Are you better off comparing them side by side, or having one, then keep eating the other for three months? I don't know about you, but I forget what I typed two seconds ago let alone remember how something very similar to the current specimen sounded like eons ago .
You may be right. Question is, how do we know that relative to it being an excuse to dismiss results that contradict it? When is it an excuse to accept new data vs a factor by itself? And how do we prove the answer is right? I know how to do it in the case of it being an excuse. Don't know how to do the other.
Amir,
I would not expect you to go in this misleading analogy, even with a smile ...
Do you remember the typical sound of CD players of the late 80's? For the first few weeks or months most of us loved it. Only when we found we were not listening anymore, that wife was not joining for hearing the new recordings and even the cat ran away after a few minutes we realized that it was not the perfect sound forever ... I still have some reviews of early players - how mistaken people were at that time!
BTW, I hope some day I will be able to listen to a ML53 and have an opinion on it. But at that time it should be with a ML52 and an adequate source, cables and speakers - I am a system believer.