Perhaps my choice of words was not ideal. Your examples could sound like mockery, but that's fine.
I rather think of "natural sound" as one which is simply totally engaging and relaxing. That is really the only criteria we need. Improvements that bring us closer to that state of nirvana are always obvious. It's intuitive.
I am not sure we need to ask ourselves whether what we hear from our system at home sounds like a live performance, because it simply is not and never will be.
Perhaps I am staring the obvious?
No, not obvious at all. I feel strongly that much of the talking past each other and consternation we see on and experience on WBF is due to not recognizing that there are different and equally valid high-end audio objectives, and to not understanding, before commencing the discussion, the differing viewpoints of people arising from these different objectives.
I would put you in Objective 3) create a sound subjectively pleasing to the audiophile.
Natural sound is not exclusive to any of the objectives.
Hopkins and I are not talking past each other. We simply disagree and have different goals and values.
Peter I can imagine the conversation.… but officer, I’m only drinking the wine while driving to make the music in my truck more engaging…I can relax to a lot of audio systems, especially when I have some wine, the music is good, and there is a convivial atmosphere conducive to relaxation. If the music is engaging, I can be engaged listening to my truck radio.
Peter I can imagine the conversation.… but officer, I’m only drinking the wine while driving to make the music in my truck more engaging…
Making sure there’s plenty of good music available at all times is the go and if the car has a sound that has a good tonal balance and is relatively coherent (often simple speaker systems can help) there’s plenty of moving music engagement even without wine (apparently )… the same basic essential qualities that an iPhone based video recording can convey.That is pretty funny Tao. I got pretty engaged when I heard The Pretenders' "My City was Gone" leading into one of my favorite radio shows. The head banging and air drumming must have distracted some fellow motorists back in those glory days of talk radio.
Making sure there’s plenty of good music available at all times is the go and if the car has a sound that has a good tonal balance and is relatively coherent (often simple speaker systems can help) there’s plenty of moving music engagement even without wine (apparently )… the same basic essential qualities that an iPhone based video recording can convey.
It’s truly horrible when you’re in someone else’s car for a reasonably long trip and they torture you with their hifi playlist though… omg!!
I find car stereos are often way less fatiguing than many audiophile setups.
I find car stereos are often way less fatiguing than many audiophile setups.
No to all of that.
“Ineluctably” - now that’s an uncommon wordI am disagreeing with your view that the two hands of the pianist have "nothing to do with imaging."
On the one hand you distain pinpoint imaging, but on the other hand the aural visualization of the two hands of the pianist is ineluctably pinpoint imaging.
This could be a good question and it needs new topic in WBF:It's as simple as countless audiophile setups are just fatiguing.
+1.I find car stereos are often way less fatiguing than many audiophile setups.
+1.
In home audio, the direct sound from loudspeakers don't reach to the listener due to angled cone of woofers. The almost direct sounds hit side walls, floor, and ceiling 1st (and many times) before they reach to a listener. Therefore, they sound bright, far back vocal sounds, and veiled. The ears must be very close to loudspeakers (4~7ft) to hear some direct sounds.
In the car, our ears are very close to speakers and we hear more direct sounds. Also, the car interior is like a recording studio that 70-80% of surface is covered with sound absorbing materials.
Alex/Wavetouch