Ah, ok. I thought you meant the whole turntable system (table, phono etc.)Oh, thats what I meant.
Ah, ok. I thought you meant the whole turntable system (table, phono etc.)Oh, thats what I meant.
Marc,Jeffrey, I'm a big fan of idlers and de facto vintage TTs. But I still remain amazed this build not only beats a "fully loaded", overengineered, and commensurately pricey, modern belt drive, but according to you, beats it significantly. That really is something.
The Arche headshell I had was a lot heavier with a lot of bulit-in adjustments, too heavy for the SME, matched the Axiom tonearm better the combination is even less attractive. Certainly there are people who like these products It doesn't change what I'm hearing and why I don't like them .Dear David,
I know, but you also know that there are other assessments out there, Tango etc.
the Arche L is just 16g.
best
eckart
www.AudioCirc.com
How do you connect SPU to Arche headshell? Modern Decca carts maybe vintage one definitely not compatible.The arche works very well on FR arms for koetsu, SPU, and Decca carts. Never compared the headshell though a friend has that set up on FR 66, and @shakti had it with fr64 on koetsu
The fit and finish of the Glanz appears to be fantastic, that arm would be a good addition to the FR.I tried a bunch of headshells for my FR-64S + Koetsu a few years back. Titanium, wood, Ikeda, Graphite and a few others that I have forgotten. I have never tried the SME, since I don't have an SME arm. The Arche is my favorite, by a long shot, for sound quality. I ordered mine with the 4mm longer titanium rods and I can comfortably align to Baerwald with 231.5 P2S. Dietrich's customer service has been very good, even giving me tips on how to properly set up the FR. Still want to try the Glanz MH-124S, maybe in 2022.