The story is taking an interesting twist today, with the WH's admission that he was unarmed but still "resisted". This sounds like he made a run for it, and got it in the chest first, then in the head to be sure.
The story is taking an interesting twist today, with the WH's admission that he was unarmed but still "resisted". This sounds like he made a run for it, and got it in the chest first, then in the head to be sure.
Whatever...They made the right decision.
Did they? The WH said his "wife" made a move towards the SEALs and they shot her in the leg; why wouldn't they do the same with bin Laden and get more info out of him, and show the world he's captured? On this very question, an ex-SEAL on CNN tonight made a reference to Murphy's Law, as if they wouldn't give Murphy's Law a chance. Hmmm... If we had a body we would be able to tell a lot by a simple forensic examination, but we don't, do we...
Just a lot of holes and unanswered questions.
Personally I don't believe they were there to bring him back alive. Can you imagine the potential for zealots capturing innocent hostages to use to trade for Bin Laden's release
Personally I don't believe they were there to bring him back alive. Can you imagine the potential for zealots capturing innocent hostages to use to trade for Bin Laden's release
The customary robes worn by Bin Laden offer great potential for concealed weapons. He would have merely had to make a motion that alarmed the SEAL team and that is a deadly threat.
Now contrast this against the legality of intentionally or un-intentionally harboring a terrorist by a state (Pakistan) and another state's right (US) to protect its interests, though by clearly breaking international law when it comes to at least invasion of a state's sovereign space on which war has not been declared nor has it been notified... What are the rules of engagement in that case, while also considering how dangerous bin Laden was and how valuable to ALL collecting information from his computers is?Former West German Chancellor Helmut Schmidt told German TV the operation could have incalculable consequences in the Arab world at a time of unrest there.
"It was quite clearly a violation of international law," .
It was a view echoed by high-profile Australian human rights lawyer Geoffrey Robertson.
"It's not justice. It's a perversion of the term. Justice means taking someone to court, finding them guilty upon evidence and sentencing them," Robertson told Australian Broadcasting Corp television from London.
Well, easy to say so... Just raising more questions and issues...At the United Nations, questions arose about the killing. The organization’s senior human rights official, Navi Pillay, called for more details.
While noting that Bin Laden was a dangerous man, she said any operation against him should have been done legally.
Totally agree. It was a kill mission and they didn't want the body either.Personally I don't believe they were there to bring him back alive. Can you imagine the potential for zealots capturing innocent hostages to use to trade for Bin Laden's release
Has anyone seen Keifer.....hmmm, I'm wondering?I thought there was one season of 24 where this case of eliminating a terrorist and some protocol or legality was raised. It's a good thing I'm a bit familiar already with these terms, and situations. In one episode, Jack Bauer accidentally killed a Chinese personel inside the residence of the Chinese ambassador, raising questions of national security vs protocol. Well, we now know these things do happen.
Meanwhile, Indonesia's defense minister Purnomo Yusgiantoro said the country's most wanted terrorist suspect Umar Patek was in Abbottabad to meet Osama bin Laden when he was arrested there early this year. Patek was injured in a raid by Pakistani intelligence agents on a house in Abbottabad on Jan. 25, but news of arrest only leaked out in late March.
A senior American counterterrorism official said Patek's arrest in Abbottabad "appears to have been pure coincidence" and that there were no indications that Patek met with bin Laden in Abbottabad.