My comment had to do with knowledge of the industry, since our erstwhile friend dismissed this thread and his involvement here as an exercise in self-gratification by people who didn't understand how the industry worked. I didn't suggest that my knowledge of the industry gave me any insight into sound quality; that was the result of my personal interest in music and its reproduction for the past 4 decades- and what led me into this area of the law. I retired from the full-time practice of law 2 years ago to get more involved in the creative side of the business. If you go back and re-read that part of the discussion, i think you will see the context.
I found that poster in question to be arrogant, dismissive, condescending, and quite negative.
I go to quite a few live shows in smaller venues and I make it a point to talk to the acts. These are
performers with major label distribution and, etc. They all tell me the same thing.
Their revenue stream is from merch, touring, and hopefully from getting a song in a movie or tv show.
You can blame any one you want..record execs, A&R men, etc. Society is largely the culprit. Even Pearl Jam wondered,
if the album has any more significance, when they released their excellent Lightening Bolt last month. I think the fact that they
launched a 45 city tour tells us how they expect to profit.
Funny side story. I spoke to Mark Lanegan, who I am a massive fan of, when he played the Casbah here in 2004. I told him as a fan
it was my sincere hope that he keeps making music and recording...he smiled and said..
"God willing". Since that time
he has released many recordings, and with the help of two tours a year, and a few songs he recorded for video games,
and a few films, he makes a living. He also does a vocal on the new Moby record. The game has changed and he
would be starving if expecting to make a living today based on units sold.