Fu Manchu. Drive . Made with an iPhone.
Played through the GM70 amps, Azzolina Foundation TT, Kuzma 313 and DRT XV-1shi, which amp is this with?
Yeah, it's an inferior-engineered recording but even such recordings have levels of musicality to them. Whe you crank up the volume.
Of course you absolutely do. You’ve asked this before and I responded but this time I’ll respond a bit differently.Why does the volume always need to be cranked up? Is it music choice or does the system need to be loud to be enjoyed? I don’t need to play videos loudly to understand what the system is doing.
Actually, the same concept applies to all genres and music.Hi Peter! Some believe rock music (as just one LOUD example) should be played back as close to the live recording level as a system - and listener preference - allows.* This is hopefully consistent with playback of unamplified music at the level one would hear it in its natural setting. Of course, few are the hifi rigs that can encompass the full range of music types successfully imo.
*Here's an excerpt from Martin Colloms 12/91 article BASSO PROFUNDO from Stereophile
As Peter Walker has concisely stated, "there is only one correct volume level for any particular piece of music." Taking into account listening-room acoustics, the original recording technique, etc., in theory there is just one volume level which places the dynamic music envelope correctly in the characteristic curves. A particular instrument was played at a particular loudness, and a matching tonality should be reproduced at a matched level relative to the listener and his expected location. Only then will the instrument sound natural, and the normal dynamics of musical expression be reproduced in the expected range.
(https://www.stereophile.com/content/basso-profundo-page-2)
Kind regards
Of course you absolutely do. You’ve asked this before and I responded but this time I’ll respond a bit differently.
Let’s say for sake of argument you’re in search of a fine sports car and you’ve the opportunity to evaluate the latest Bugatti Veyron model on a local track. Do you drive the Veyron limiting your speed to 55 mph or do you stress the car and track designs to their and your limits?
Or let’s say for sake of argument you already own a Veyron and you’ve been invited to bring it to a newly designed track. Do you keep your speed around 55 mph max or do you attempt to take the Veyron and track to its potential limits?
Which is more telling? Can’t most any vehicle handle 55 mph without much difficulty? If that’s all you’re willing to give it, where’s the challenge? That question applies your own skills, the vehicle, and the track. Speaking of which, how is your knowledge, understanding, skill level, etc ever expected to expand or improve if you’re only willing to drive 55?
Does any of this imply the Veyron or track is to be driven balls-to-the-walls pedal-to-the-medal at all times? Of course not. For there is a certain pleasure and relaxation and safety driving at 55 mph. But you’re certainly not able to evaluate much of anything at that speed and at the same time you’ve stripped away most everything the sport has to offer.
It also pays to ask, how did the Veyron designers intend the car be driven? Same question with the track designers.
Or is it your argument that since scientists have discovered the risk of injury and death go up when driving fast, all driving and racing should be limited to a conservative speed like 55 mph?
Regardless of the above, the musicians, producers, and engineers all agreed to some extent how loud the live performance ought to be and recorded. Are you suggesting they should have consulted you and your friends first?
Gotta’ remember, Peter. This industry is (or was) supposedly called high-end audio for a reason.
Excellent. What is it that you understand? And how does your understanding apply to this performance-oriented pursuit?I understand that,
As I recall earlier in his video-coupling thread Ron said that he listened via his iPhone's built-in speaker and more recently I coulda' swore he said he was listening via some computer desktop speakers.but unlike Ron Resnick who plays back videos on his main system,
Oh, that's right. I remember you mentioning once how you were judging the quality of a video's bass based how much your desktop speakers vibrated. Really?I listen to them on my computer and cranking them doesn’t necessarily help understand what the system is doing.
I generally post numerous genres but a bit more frequently I'll post pop/rock. Mostly because those are more challenging. Assuming of course we're listening to our playback presentations near live performance volume levels. Which should always be the case when evaluating a playback presentation.You generally post pop and rock music...
Hmmmmm. When sound is broadcast into the listening room and traveling toward the little stereo mic, it's all analog, right? This is a new concept to me and on its face sounds a bit silly. Please explain your understanding here about how digital makes any difference about anything here.... that is digital so I can understand why you would want to play it loudly,
Of course you do. Unless perhaps performance really doesn't matter to you, your idea of performance is a bit skewed, or perhaps you're living in the land of make-believe?but I don’t need to do that when other people send me their system videos of piano sonatas and string quartets or choral music.
I understand that to fully evaluate system performance, one might want to listen to live or near live volume levels. A system that can do this without distortion is good.Excellent. What is it that you understand? And how does your understanding apply to this performance-oriented pursuit?
As I recall earlier in his video-coupling thread Ron said that he listened via his iPhone's built-in speaker and more recently I coulda' swore he said he was listening via some computer desktop speakers.
I don’t have desktop speakersOh, that's right. I remember you mentioning once how you were judging the quality of a video's bass based how much your desktop speakers vibrated. Really?
I cannot play videos at near live volumes over my computer. The computer system is not capable of producing such volumes without distortion or giving me a headacheAs for "cranking them" videos not necessarily helping you understand what the system is doing, what's your idea of "cranking" and what exactly are you listening for?
I generally post numerous genres but a bit more frequently I'll post pop/rock. Mostly because those are more challenging. Assuming of course we're listening to our playback presentations near live performance volume levels. Which should always be the case when evaluating a playback presentation.
Hmmmmm. When sound is broadcast into the listening room and traveling toward the little stereo mic, it's all analog, right? This is a new concept to me and on its face sounds a bit silly. Please explain your understanding here about how digital makes any difference about anything here.
Of course you do. Unless perhaps performance really doesn't matter to you, your idea of performance is a bit skewed, or perhaps you're living in the land of make-believe?
You said you understood what I was saying in my previous post so let's go back to the car and track analogies for a moment. If you were a Formula 1 driver with this same performance mindset, what place do you think you'd finish the race?
Better yet, why not articulate why in this supposed high-end performance-oriented industry playback volume levels approaching the live performance should be of no benefit to you and others? While answering that think again, what exactly are you listening for at these low volume levels? It certainly can't be low-level detail so we can scratch most of the ambient info and subtle nuances off the list right now.
Too funny, Peter. Anyway, I’m just gonna’ point out a few more things and then move on.I understand that to fully evaluate system performance, one might want to listen to live or near live volume levels. A system that can do this without distortion is good.
you should ask Ron how he listens to these videos. I read that Bonzo convinced him to listen to the videos through his main system. I don’t know if he actually does that
I don’t have desktop speakers
I cannot play videos at near live volumes over my computer. The computer system is not capable of producing such volumes without distortion or giving me a headache
I agree when talking about the main system. But here I am talking about evaluating videos over my computer
yes the sound waves that the microphone captures are analog, but your source in your videos I think is digital. I don’t see an analog source in your system videos but they are dark so I don’t really know. I find I have to play your videos louder than other videos to enjoy them and to hear what is going on I think it has something to do with your music choice and your system.
You can think whatever you want.
we are talking about iPhone videos played back on my desktop computer. We’re not talking about high-performance automobile on a race track. The analogy would be closer if e were discussing main systems of a high-quality.
I am all for playing back my records at near to live or live volume levels. But that is my main system where my horn speakers have extremely low levels of distortion. That is very different from my computer speakers.
The Cure, The Clash, just so many to choose from...
and for something a bit more sophisticateder...
Thanks for reminding me just how much I love those tracks and kinds of music Peter… I’ve been in a bit of a full on search for some of the greater string quartets, quintets and sextets over the last month or so and there’s remarkably few drum highlights to be had in the world of string chamber music lol.I will let Graham’s two videos do the talking. There are a lot of videos on this thread. These two are among the best, IMO.
Too funny, Peter. Anyway, I’m just gonna’ point out a few more things and then move on.
1. It seems you’re doing your analytical listening of others’ videos using your computer’s speakers rather than a reasonable (think musical) set of headphones.
2. It seems you’re listening to these videos via your computer’s speakers at significantly lower than live performance volume levels.
Not that either sonic restriction seems to hinder your imagination but upon which you then publish your criticisms of others’ videos as though you’re contributing some sort of constructive performance eval?
This among other things like your admission that you’re unable to correlate any similarities between the attributes of a high-end audio performance-oriented mindset (including in-room videos) that should be common with perhaps any other performance-oriented industry lead me to one conclusion. Well, actually it’s the same conclusion I’ve suspected for years.
As you said, I can think whatever I want. But perhaps the question you ought to consider asking yourself is, what evidence is there that substantiates the level of engagement you think you genuinely put into this performance-oriented hobby?
There you go showing your true colors again, Peter. FWIW, aside from a reaonably musical bass, that second piece was downright atrocious at times.I will let Graham’s two videos do the talking. There are a lot of videos on this thread. These two are among the best, IMO.