Revised:
In my personal preference ordering I am not willing to accept what I perceive as any harshness, any metallic-ness, any edginess, any dryness for more apparent detail or for seemingly more resolution. What my ears hear as harshness, metallic-ness or edginess derail my connection to the music, my suspension of disbelief.
I truly believe that for whatever reason I am more idiosyncratically sensitive to what I perceive as harshness, metallic-ness or edginess than other people. Kedar, of course, is correct. Nobody seeks what they perceive as harshness, metallic-ness or edginess.
Different people are sensitive to different things, and different people are sensitive to the same things in different degrees. As an example I found the Wilson metal dome tweeter to be a total dealbreaker sonically. I don't understand how people enjoyed Watts or Maxxes. But many audiophiles enjoyed those loudspeakers.
I am reminded of the "rainbow effect" from one chip DLP projectors. Some videofiles perceive the rainbow effect and it can make them slightly nauseous, and other videofiles literally don't see it at all. The latter group literally doesn't know what the former group is talking (complaining) about.
I believe that what I perceive as a slight harshness or edginess (often from metal drivers such as beryllium drivers) is perceived by other audiophiles as desirable and realistic leading-edge transient response or detail or resolution or fidelity to the digital file or master tape.
In my personal preference ordering I am not willing to accept what I perceive as any harshness, any metallic-ness, any edginess, any dryness for more apparent detail or for seemingly more resolution. What my ears hear as harshness, metallic-ness or edginess derail my connection to the music, my suspension of disbelief.
I truly believe that for whatever reason I am more idiosyncratically sensitive to what I perceive as harshness, metallic-ness or edginess than other people. Kedar, of course, is correct. Nobody seeks what they perceive as harshness, metallic-ness or edginess.
Different people are sensitive to different things, and different people are sensitive to the same things in different degrees. As an example I found the Wilson metal dome tweeter to be a total dealbreaker sonically. I don't understand how people enjoyed Watts or Maxxes. But many audiophiles enjoyed those loudspeakers.
I am reminded of the "rainbow effect" from one chip DLP projectors. Some videofiles perceive the rainbow effect and it can make them slightly nauseous, and other videofiles literally don't see it at all. The latter group literally doesn't know what the former group is talking (complaining) about.
I believe that what I perceive as a slight harshness or edginess (often from metal drivers such as beryllium drivers) is perceived by other audiophiles as desirable and realistic leading-edge transient response or detail or resolution or fidelity to the digital file or master tape.
Last edited: