Ron, in this fantasy scenario, what speaker would you choose to assess whether or not the amplifiers sound the same?
my Clarisys speakers

Assess whether amplifiers sound the same? That's not what I'm assessing. I assess which amplifier achieves greater suspension of disbelief and sounds more natural and convincing.

Have you ever compared the ML2 directly to another amplifier in the same system
no
 
Didn't he like it?
no

I find that is this mode the Siegfried approaches much of the sound of SETs.
I would not go that far. Full range I prefer triode mode.

But if high-power, push-pull, massed tube amps approached much of the end of SETs, then we wouldn't need SETs.
 
Yes, we get strong smearing. I also own ESL 63 - a completely different sound perspective.

My point is that the way we look at surfaces depends on conditions. For example, we need a significant distance between the sound source and the diffusor before it starts working as a diffusor. In small rooms diffusors do not act as diffusors.
Yes .. depending on frequency of course
I am not a fan of diffusers or absorbers at first reflection points because they mess up phase.
I think distance is the best option .. followed by redirection
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu