Thanks for all the replies.
About 6 weeks or so ago I had an experience that made a huge impression on me. I was listening to Oscar Peterson and I was mesmerized by the vividness of the presentation. The source was tape. The system was damn good too - one of the best I have ever heard. I listened to several tapes that day (along with some vinyl) and haven't been able to get it out of my mind since.
I currently have a digital music server and a turntable. I relax a lot more when I listen to an LP and my music of choice is 50's jazz. Skipping songs is not at all a priority for me - in fact I prefer not being able to. Being able to get all the music I want on tape is also not a priority. Being able to get some classics/favorites is all I really want.
If I were to take the plunge I would definitely need to buy from someone I could trust. I am not a DIY'er.
I relax a lot more when I listen to an LP and my music of choice is 50's jazz. Skipping songs is not at all a priority for me - in fact I prefer not being able to.
I'll second Mark's comments! As a matter of fact, tape allows me to appreciate more of the composers or musicians intent than other other format. I'd rather have one Armani suit rather than 10 store brands.
Let me tell you. There's nothing like the WOW factor hearing Kenny Burrell on 15 ips tape. Ask Alex what he heard when I played the various rock 'n roll tapes when he was over a week or so ago. You can't separate the music from the sound. They are one and the same.
And as far as listening to my system rather than to the music, I'd say that 10,000 or so LPs says it all.
OMMV.
Can we put some rough numbers on the investment in a serious rig?
what's a studio level deck, refurbished with good outboard pre cost these days? I'm guessing ballpark 20-25k to do it right? (And up?)
the biggest issue to me would be availability and cost of source material- once i get ramped up on the biz rather than lawyer side of the music biz, i hope to have better access to tapes, but for new good quality 15 ips 1/2 track, aren't we talking 300-500 a tape if you subscribe to one of the groups?
I found an A80vu machine for $1500... which is probably a steel. I've seen several A80RC models for around $3500. New heads, rebuilt motors and a little massaging will be about $3 - $5k.
Technics decks can be had pretty cheap. I've seen them go for as low as $800. Put another $3k in them with an outboard pre ($2k - 10k) and you're set!
Subscribing to the Tape Project will cost you $300, non-subscribers will be $500.
If and when i make the jump, I'd be inclined to go for a studio grade machine. The price of entry you described is extremely reasonable, and I gather you think that unit doesn't require a tweaked preamp stage to maximize? I guess the other issue is whether the studio machines require more matinenance than a pro-consumer unit. I would assume the big Studers, Ampexes, etc. were built to high standards, but my impression was that as work horses, they were constantly maintained.
Sorry Myles, 10k LP's just tells me you are a music collector it says little about listening to music you enjoy. Owning an album you play once every five years holds little interest for me. I would rather give it away and search for new music.
Also, I grew up with the music of the 50, 60 & 70 and there was filler in just about every album from that era too. I think you may have selective memory about the good old days.
Jim
I found an A80vu machine for $1500... which is probably a steel. I've seen several A80RC models for around $3500. New heads, rebuilt motors and a little massaging will be about $3 - $5k.
Technics decks can be had pretty cheap. I've seen them go for as low as $800. Put another $3k in them with an outboard pre ($2k - 10k) and you're set!
Subscribing to the Tape Project will cost you $300, non-subscribers will be $500.
The two techs that I've used hailed from Record One in Hollywood, Alan Sides studio. They are both named Mike.... One I can't recall his last name worked on my A80 and the other Mike.. Mike Guerra is my ATR tech... They are both killer techs and I highly recommend both. Guerra's specialty is the ATR as he was responsible to keep all of Alan's ATR's up to spec at all times.
Bolois said my machine was a bit to old for his blood and suggested that I give the Record One techs a buzz....
Alas... Record One is no more but I still have these two on speed dial if needed!
It's well worth mentioning that you don't get the best playback, even with great outboard electronics, if you don't fine tune the head azimuth for the particular tape you're playing.An A80RC or Ampex ATR-102 does not need an outboard pre, or at least I've never heard an outboard pre make it sound better. The Aria on the Ampex I feel makes it sound worse!
An A80vu machine would "probably" benefit from out outboard pre provided you can't get a good tech to rebuild the repro cards.
Once you get them dialed in, there is no more maintenance than a turntable. Just clean the heads/guides and use the calibration tape once in a while.
It's well worth mentioning that you don't get the best playback, even with great outboard electronics, if you don't fine tune the head azimuth for the particular tape you're playing.
It would be nice to think that any professionally recorded master or dub would be of exactly the same alignment accuracy, but they aren't. Azimuth (and even HF & LF EQ) can vary from studio to studio, dub to dub. So many people trading dubs aren't even aware of alignment of the played tape before making a dub.
The problem is compounded by the likes of The Tape Project (and, to be fair, most other similar companies) that don't include calibration tones on their (very expensive) dubs.
To really hear what's there, you would be well served to learn how to use an XY oscilloscope/vectorscope (which compares left channel to right channel and produces what's known as a Lissajous pattern display) to tweak your head azimuth on any tape with HF tones (of at least 10KHz). Azimuth alignment can also be achieved without tones, but it's usually beyond the capabilities of most audiophiles. It's that last little step (sorta like SRA on a turntable) that makes the difference between an ordinary tape playback and an excellent one.
Of course, if you never adjust your azimuth to each tape, you might hear 40-50% of the tapes at their best, assuming your machine is right on with a standard alignment tape (MRL or equivalent).
--Bill
Yeah, you're right. Unfortunately, it doesn't agree with MRL tapes, AND WORSE, it often doesn't agree with their own dubs (which vary from project to project).The tape project does provide a calibration tape.
Good Show! Opus three will provide alignment tones if you specifically request them. They agree closely with the MRL standard.Tony at UltraAnalogue does provide test tones with his tapes.
Yeah, I've heard that. Something about the specific material making up the laminations, coil wire, etc. I can imagine those things making a difference, but to what degree? It would be quite informative to know.If you talk to Brian Weitzel, you should have a different headstack for every tape (he has 24 right now).
Azimuth alignment can also be achieved without tones, but it's usually beyond the capabilities of most audiophiles.
--Bill
And for people that don't have O-scopes, you can also do azimuth adjustments within certain software programs. I've also checked these against the hardware and they're spot-on.