I think Micro puts forth a valid, and perhaps, overlooked point.
Gross Generalization and Stating the Obvious Alert:
An arm designed for a suspended turntable will not perform ideally when mated to a non-suspended design.
An arm designed for a non-suspended turntable will not perform ideally when mated to a suspended design.
An arm designed for low-compliance cartridges will not perform ideally when mated to medium/high-compliance cartridge.
An arm designed for medium/high compliance cartridges will not perform ideally when mated to a low compliance cartridge.
The release of the V-series arms occurred shortly before SME released its own turntable, a fully suspended design that shared elements of A.J. Conti’s designs and those of the Hydraulic Reference (I believe David Gammon was the first to use a paddle damped by a silicone bath in a turntable design), mirroring Michell Engineering’s move in which it built the licensed Transcriptor around its own arm (though most came with SME cutouts for the 3009).
Indeed, if there appears to be a commonality of design solutions among the turntables produced at a similar point in history from SME, Basis, Michell and Linn in the 80s and 90s, it’s that they all attempted to isolate the platter via some form of subplatter/suspension.
The SME Series II arm predates the release of the 30/2 by twenty nine years, produced during a time in which unsprung broadcast turntables were the norm. Coincidence? Perhaps not.
Best,
853guy