Concerning technical details you are just quoting full sentences from other sources that are not relevant to what I stated - nothing new. You state "apparently" and add the usual references to medical and military. I can show direct measurements, data and graphs that show these DACs are technically very different.
As I said above:
Both the dCS designers and the Yggy designer (Mike Moffat) wanted to make DACs that sounded very good, but importantly also measured well. They might certainly disagree as to what constitutes good measurements.
And sorry, making judgments on DACs based on measurements is only ridiculous for those who are not knowledgeable enough to interpret them. Measurements do not tell the whole story, but tell a lot.
The statement about specifications that I quoted was made only with respect to the number of bits, and it was explained why this mattered less than many people think.
BTW we have all kind of perspectives in WBF - for example some people valuate mostly the speakers and consider that decent electronics sound all similar, or even that differences between competent DACs are minimal - I am ready to understand their point of view when I see their preferences and systems. It is part of the hobby.
I certainly do think that there are clear differences between electronics, and so do all my audiophile friends. Or are you insinuating something here?