I thought I was gonna read a thread about Gryphon amps and perhaps some comparison with D'Agostino amps. In the Stereophile article there was 3 references to 'D'Agostino' and the only comparisons I read was about the bass, the absence of 'magic' from the D'Ag amps and something vague about the inadequacy of dynamics from the Gryphon. Discussion about the amps doesn't seem to be happening in this thread.
I gather it was an article somewhat positive for the Gryphon amp and that's fine and the many paragraphs of quotes from the designer and the marketing director were communicative and somewhat interesting. But it is a terrible review. Almost as bad as his write-up on the ARC Ref 6SE in October where he rattles on about after-market products.
Why did the thread need to turn into another discussion about Fremer?
Hi Tim
You should know by now, the disingenuous click bait threads from Caesar are just that. I wonder if he even read the review, but he has mysteriously gone to ground now.
Agree, no real in depth comparison between the Progression or the Essence amps except Dag had better bass control and clarity and the Essence had more emotions on one track.
Something Fremer would have done if the Progression amps were his reference.
There was more editorial on footers for the Essence than music, as in stock form seemed not that good?
Cheers
Last edited: