Of course, but not legally available...
Yea, but who cares? Is anyone really in the market for digital music recorded from LP?
Of course, but not legally available...
Yea, but who cares? Is anyone really in the market for digital music recorded from LP?
Gus responded back and told me that the credits listed for the DSD mastering are incorrect and he is going to notify Acoustic Sounds.
Yea, but who cares? Is anyone really in the market for digital music recorded from LP?
i understand the legality issue. but through a website like hd tracks , so the artist gets there cut. there is a german company that does this. but they are limited to what they intend to sell.
So you are telling us in no uncertain terms that they pulled out the MASTER ANALOG tape YET AGAIN to do a special DSD archive just for this download, when every other
DSD download on the site was created from the corresponding SACD files. I find that very hard to believe that they did this for one title out of 150 or so.
Secondly, "incorrect" credits is the type of +bullshit+ that is going to destroy the market. We already have a huge credibility issue with hi rez, and there
is no room for error.
Assuming this is true, which I have major doubts, they are essentially saying who ever bought the $30 Marino SACD is a sucker.
Not really. How is this any different from buying an amp from a manufacturer and a year later a new model comes out?
Same situation with the amplifier, if you are happy with the sound of the SACD that is really all that matters.
I trust Gus over a marketing blurb on the Acoustic Sounds website. I have noticed many errors on that site with vinyl mastering credits.
Not that simple. You just don't pull out a tape to do another archive..why not pull out ALL the Marino masterings and re do them..?
So are they going to refund all the those buyers the 30 bucks who bought the first go around? I think not.
I think you just completely glossed over my post...
Here it is in bold
How is this any different from buying an amp from a manufacturer and a year later a new model comes out?
Same situation with the amplifier, if you are happy with the sound of the SACD that is really all that matters.
There is ALWAYS a new reissue for the audiophile favorites. The new one is always "better" than the one before according to the pros.
No, I did not gloss over anything. With all due respect, your amplifier analogy is meaningless to this discussion.
Being happy with the SACD is another story. That is in the eye of the beholder. Clearly mep was NOT happy with the sound
of his SACD download.
Titles do not get remastered within a year of each other in the same format with any regularity.
The SACD disc came out in 2011.
mep is unhappy with the sound of the DSD download, not the same as the SACD disc according to Gus.
I agree is unusual to have a reissue come out in the same format within a couple of years, but it's not unheard of. I know a few vinyl reissues that were reissued by different companies within very short periods.
JTinn-I'm glad you think it's ridiculous. I paid $24 for a DSD that sounds just like the 24/192 PCM version I bought from HD Tracks. I'm confident that the original source was the tape, but what digital stages it went through on the way to becoming the DSD I'm not so sure. The DSD version of Teal For the Tillerman doesn't sound like the rest of my DSD collection in terms of sounding like great analog. Chad's LP version blows the DSD file in the weeds.
So you are telling us in no uncertain terms that they pulled out the MASTER ANALOG tape YET AGAIN to do a special DSD archive just for this download, when every other
DSD download on the site was created from the corresponding SACD files. I find that very hard to believe that they did this for one title out of 150 or so.
Secondly, "incorrect" credits is the type of +bullshit+ that is going to destroy the market. We already have a huge credibility issue with hi rez, and there
is no room for error.
Assuming this is true, which I have major doubts, they are essentially saying who ever bought the $30 Marino SACD is a sucker.
MEP,
what exactly was it with this DSD version you did not like, did it sound closer to say some of the better hirez PCM releases or was it something else?
I appreciate and agree there is usually a trait that differentiates DSD and PCM so curious what it was about this one that made you feel so strongly negative about this DSD release.
Thanks
Orb