i went to the FMA-Venture room once each day and listened. i liked it but it never really connected with me. i heard a number of familiar recordings that i have in the room.
particularly i listened to 'Why Worry' from Dire Straits 'Brothers in Arms' redbook in the sweet spot with me as the only person in the room. this track has lots of textural nuance and can be quite a trip. it was good in this room, but it did not really get up and take flight like i would have expected. it did not seem to have that decay and spacial specialness, nor the micro-dynamics i'm use to. i don't expect any show system to quite measure up to my reference, but this system ought to go farther.
is it the amps? the speakers? the cables? the source? the room?
as always, it's a show. and YMMV. but when you are talking multiple hundreds of thousands of dollars and a big room the expectations are high.
I also agree that YG sounded good this time (and has never in the past for me). I commented that it was a much warmer sound than what I remembered and the YG rep there told me they had made 'a lot' of changes based on feedback.
As a WattPuppy owner I was looking forward to hearing the Alexia, but thought the demo was unimpressive - especially with all those pricey electronics. I look forward to hearing these again in a better room.
for those of us that didnt attend, indulge us. rather than mention the bad how about the good:
-best system in the low to mid five-figure price category
-best component or brand you never heard before
-best system in the no holds barred category
-best demo music
Luke Manley probably didn’t design the VTL amps, but he is responsible for their design and I’m quite sure if Luke felt that KT-88s smoked the sound of 6550s that Luke would have used KT-88s in his amp.
I think this is just a classic case of how we all hear differently and why we all like different things because of how we hear differently.
For me, it was the CD that Myles brought from the Fairfield Four. The cut "Roll Jordan Roll" is just exceptional as a demo piece. It never failed to drop jaws in any room we were in.
i went to the FMA-Venture room once each day and listened. i liked it but it never really connected with me. i heard a number of familiar recordings that i have in the room.
Mike, I know you will want to kill me for saying this, but when I first went into the FM/Venture room, I stood up to leave after 30 seconds. That's when they switched from LP to computer source and voila, it was a total different ball game. I think, as you've said before, what we have here is yet another unfortunate example of a table set-up that did not live up to its potential. Among the pieces I heard, the Weavers at Carnegie Hall knocked me out with the same clarity and soundstage I get on my LP rig at home. I told them they should pack up their turntable and stick to CD and computer sources for the rest of the show. I think that's why there was a hit man following me around from room to room after that.......
I'm surprised in the FMA room they are still using FMA's bottom-line Pre 245 for a show of this magnitude. Could be logistics issue, for they, I assumed, should very well have known that by a simple swap of just the Pre alone in that system to say the 266mkII/268 could have catapulted the sound quality by a mile.. Well, at least 3-4 notches up, believe me, not subtle. Anyhow, it's done, glad that even so, they managed quite a great showing. Congrats Audio Limits!