Nick Doshi also makes another tape preamp that is a modified version of his excellent hybrid phono stage. It's a bit more expensive than Charlie's unit and does a nice job of maintaining the harmonics resolution of tubes while giving you the quietness of solid-state, something that people in the pro arena must have .
Direct A/B comparison... no. I need a balanced unit for studio use and did not care for Charlie's when he tried to implement that feature. I've heard Nick's a few times now and it's dead silent.
Are you sure Bruce? The phono section, that is the template for the tape pre is a hybrid design. But maybe Nick doesn't need that 70 dB of gain for the tape end and just uses the tube/MM section.
Direct A/B comparison... no. I need a balanced unit for studio use and did not care for Charlie's when he tried to implement that feature. I've heard Nick's a few times now and it's dead silent.
Yes it takes a while because Nick is working on the new version of the Emergency Broadcasting System where everyone will be notified by email or text Once he's done with that project, the order time may drop And yes, I waited like four months for the phono section. And the phono is really quiet too.
I'll look that up when get home later. I know they are good caps and probably a mix of brands. One thing that impresses you about Nick (kinda like Vladamir) is his pride in not only how his gear sounds but also how it measures on the bench. We had some interesting talks about how the phono section is optimized and why he doesn't believe in loading at 47 K.
I hope Charlie chimes in on this. A couple of years ago we tried a couple of different output transformers on the K/C( a cinemag and one other brand) while exploring options for Mike's long connection from tape preamp to his Dartzeel preamp. They both were sonic disasters and I think Charlie did not want to fiddle around trying to get a good match, as most potential customers are using single ended(RCA) inputs. Charlie eventually set it up for the special 'zeel' low impedance BNC input on the 'zeel' preamp.
It would be interesting to see how a K/C would compare to a truly balanced tape preamp for noise and sonics in a balanced system(going unbalanced from K/C into a balanced line input of a preamp).
yup as my system is completely balanced I too asked for it...Charles did mention the impelmentation problem. He indicated that the SE application is very low impedence to help better drive longer runs of cable, albeit single ended. The pre does have a quiet noise floor.
the darTZeel 'zeel' allows for long runs with single ended, so you get the low noise and most refined sound with single ended gear and can avoid true balanced circuits and transformers. which have their place but are not optimal for best sound. 50 ohm matching also is a large benefit for signal integrity.....avoiding the echo of conventional interconnects.
but i get needing the +4 XLR gain for pro audio use.
Let's try balanced output. Yeah, I tried ONE time - for Mike L - putting in a "low nickle" Cinemag 1:1 driver (output) transformer. "Mikey didn't like it", so they took it out. Have heard enough transformers used both in preamp input and output applications to "hear" that they can /do work magic BUT it does "change" the sound. There's Walter up in Newburyport who has tried all kinds of new / NOS inputs between his SPU/Schick/Fairchild and the K/C - very successfully I might add - don't remember his FAV. And Rich B, Bill D and myself have heard a tubed tape pre with an input (and output) transformer that sounded quite seductive, but had other problems.
It's not rocket science to, say, put an output transformer on the output of the K/C. But whose/which one? To "experiment" gets expensive, as these average $100 and I need two of each type - and at that price, the manufacturers I've contacted don't do "loaners". Now if "someone" wants to lend me iron - I'll put them in a box?. And then there's the listening panel....